[this is just a "are we sure that what we're doing is necessary" mail]
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 10:19 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit : >> >>> I really suggest including the clearlooks engine into the gtkdfb udeb >>> right now, test it and make sure it works correctly in the case this >>> bugs couldn't be fixed in time for RC1. >> >> >> In all cases this would have to be a different udeb, as clearlooks is >> included in the gtk2-engines source. >> >> It also means revamping the gtk2-engines build process so it's not >> trivial, but certainly feasible. > > My idea was including clearlooks engine dfb flavour into > libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb package. > I know this is not very clean, but as a temporary solution, given also > the time of the release we are , could be an acceptable solution. > Something similar [1] was also done to provide the g-i the dfbinfo tool. I have seen that Denis Barbier was able to apply the hicontrast theme to G-I just fine without the engine. Is the engine really necessary? (I never understood what is the pupose of those, so I could use some light on the subject). -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]