Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
uhm, I forgot the partition info. I took the "guided partition" option
and:
df -Tl
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 ext3 9859036 2418732 6939480 26% /
udev tmpfs 1024052 10188 1% /dev
devshm tmpfs 258480
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I tried to install Debian etch with the beta 3 netinstall image on an
Asus P5LD2-VM board with a Dual Core Intel CPU, Intel 945G Northbridge
and Intel ICH7 Southbridge.
The machine came with an SATA HD and an IDE DVD ROM.
The install failed
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst
Image version: Weekly from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sept 24, 2006
Machine: VMPLAYER on Hp Pavilion zv5120us laptop
Processor: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 1136MB
rootskel_1.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.38.dsc
rootskel_1.38.tar.gz
rootskel_1.38_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.38_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:35:01 +0200, "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> (Please reply below the text you respond to; makes reading more natural.
> Also, please reply to the bug report and not privately; reply-to set this
> time.)
>
> On Friday 15 September 2006 04:59, you wrote:
> > On Thu,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:35:01 +0200, "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> (Please reply below the text you respond to; makes reading more natural.
> Also, please reply to the bug report and not privately; reply-to set this
> time.)
>
> On Friday 15 September 2006 04:59, you wrote:
> > On Thu,
On 24-Sep-2006 Joey Hess wrote:
>> IMHO it would be nice to have a hint / warning about sarge apt-proxy
>> when manually selecting a mirror. Otherwise many people may stumble over
>> this incompatibility.
>
> How is a client supposed to get the proxy version?
Not at all. I thought of an unconditi
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst
Image version: Daily, Sept 24, 2006 - from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sept 24, 2006
Machine: VMPLAYER on Hp Pavilion zv5120us laptop
Processor: Intel(R) Cele
Of course you could display the incompatibility hint when the connection
times out (instead of when selecting a mirror). Then it would only be seen by
people that have a problem (assuming they have the patience to wait for the
timeout). On the other hand it is nice to see a hint before the problem
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> > means to remove
Hi,
On Sunday 24 September 2006 18:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Boot the installer with the additional parameter:
> tasksel/first=kde-desktop
>
> This is documented in the installation manual.
"tasksel/first=kde-desktop" is only mentioned in the chapter about
automated installation (preseed.xml), see
h
On Sunday 24 September 2006 22:24, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have traced this bug to apt. I've filed a separate bug report so we
> keep this one on our radar.
> See http://bugs.debian.org/389261 for details.
>
> P.S. If anyone wants to have a shot at creating a patch for this,
> please!
Sesse has had a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 375909 with 389261
Bug#375909: Untranslated strings in pkgsel
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 375909 added: 389261
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
block 375909 with 389261
thanks
> Some strings aren't translated while pkgsel is downloading packages:
> http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/untranslated.png
I have traced this bug to apt. I've filed a separate bug report so we keep
this one on our radar.
See http://bugs.debian.org/389261 for
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:25:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> At a minumum, the patch for tg3 exists and is fully
> functional: check with [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the version against the
> up-to-date kernel, and the corresponding loadable firmware files. It works
Comments from other had ma
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:39:38PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:08:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> (someone, I'm not sure who, wrote:)
> >> > > Re-adding them at this
On Sunday 24 September 2006 13:25, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:48, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >>>I just tried todays Etch beta netinstall install CD with the
> >>>graphical install (installgui). When the partitioning step is done
> >>>and the com
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:08:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Today I sent an email asking upstream to remove dgrs based on its
> uselessness; we'll see what happens.
Thanks. We should consider removing it, too then.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Descript
On Sunday 24 September 2006 18:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > I just tried today's Etch beta netinst install CD. Since I was curious
> > I tried the graphical installer ("installgui" installation mode). When
> > the 'tasksel' step was reached I wished I could have installed KDE.
>
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
(someone, I'm not sure who, wrote:)
>> > > Re-adding them at this stage
>> > > 1) is against the current social contract
>>
>> > Yes, but then so
Steve Langasek wrote:
> If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> means to remove this particular subset of non-free f
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.37.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.37.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-486-di_1.37_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-486-di_1.37_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.17-2-486-
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.14.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.14.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.14_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.14_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 388769 pkgsel
Bug#388769: installer hangs when installing packages; no abort possible
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `pkgsel'.
>
End of message, stopping
Wolfgang Köbler wrote:
> I tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations
> hangs when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388769 .
>
> It seems that all Debian etch installations behind a sarge apt-p
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:46:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389092: etch-beta-installer: can't install KDE from
graphical installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Frans Pop wrote:
> The EFI modules are now included in the i386 kernels.
> I have unblocked the kernel-wedge bug: #381584. Could you add the modules
> there?
Question is, to which udeb? ia64 has it in firmware-modules, if I add it
to firmware-modules on i386 then it will be pulled into ram even o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 388845 pkgsel
Bug#388845: debian-installer: Warn of sarge apt-proxy when selecting mirror
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `pkgsel'.
> severity 388845 norma
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:43:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388846: installation: Warn of sarge apt-proxy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
rootskel-gtk_0.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_0.11.dsc
rootskel-gtk_0.11.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_0.11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Meanwhile, if you want to see if you can reproduce the "BOOM" bug in GTK
> from CVS, you can proceed as follows (you'll need a ssh terminal).
> -Run gtk-demo and open the hypertext app
> -Attach gdb to the process and set a breakpoint at
> gtk_tar
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:25:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If the firmware-loading tg3 driver is present in the next kernel package
> version, I will believe that the kernel team is acting in good faith to try
> to satisfy the Social Contract.
According to the kernel-team patch po
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> them the first time in 2004.
My apologies for blowing up, although it looks like my flaming message died
in transit.
Anyway, it
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386752: fixed in cdebconf 0.106
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381979: fixed in cdebconf 0.106
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:24:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:36:00PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the correct structure is this: after choosing "Customization
> > modules", the user gets a menu of possible places to get them from (CD,
> > USB, flop
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.106_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.106_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.106_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.106_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.106_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.106_all.udeb
cdebco
partman-auto-crypto_1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-crypto_1.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_1.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_1_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> If 2.6.18 kernels really renamed a raid module
> then I would expect
>
> --- kernel-wedge/modules/md-modules (revision 40836)
> +++ kernel-wedge/modules/md-modules (working copy)
>
Great! did you also manage to reproduce the crash that makes the g-i
hang on button click?
Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
Based on your messages, I included the fixes you mention plus some
missing files as well, and was able to build Gtk 2.10.4 / DirectFB.
I've uploaded the result to experi
On Sunday 24 September 2006 13:17, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Index: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/kernel-versions
> > ===
> > --- linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/kernel-versions (revision 40861)
> > +++ linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/kernel
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:48, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I just tried todays Etch beta netinstall install CD with the
graphical install (installgui). When the partitioning step is done
and the computer starts to actually do something in the background
(probably writing the
Hi,
Based on your messages, I included the fixes you mention plus some
missing files as well, and was able to build Gtk 2.10.4 / DirectFB.
I've uploaded the result to experimental.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> First, the bad news: GTK 2.10.4 has a broken DFB backen
(this mail is BCC'ed to all translators I know about for the relevant
languages. Please respect Reply-To)
The following languages have shown a correct activity all along the
development of Debian Installer for Etch. I would just like to remind
their translators to please update their translation f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389139 installation-reports
Bug#389139: The installation went great!
Warning: Unknown package '389139'
Warning: Unknown package 'iso-8859-15'
Warning: Unknown package 'q'
Bug reassigned from package
`=?iso-8859-15?q?installation-reports_versio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 381584 by 381951
Bug#381584: Add module efivars for i386 to support elilo on MacBook Pro
Was blocked by: 381951
Blocking bugs of 381584 removed: 381951
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Package: kernel-wedge
> Version: 1.20
> Severity: normal
>
>
> As subject says, please find attached patch.
[1][2]
> Friendly,
>
> [ -- System Information: ]
> Index: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/kernel-versions
>
(Bcc'ed to translators addresses I have. Please reply to debian-i18n only)
The following languages have had a quite low, but not NULL, activity
in the recent weeks, for Debian Installer translations.
They will not be disabled for D-I RC1, but an effort should be visible
for the D-I Release Manage
(Bcc'ed to all translators addresses I have for mentioned
languages. Please reply to debian-i18n@lists.debian.org, NOT to myself)
After a discussion I've had with Frans Pop, the Debian Installer
release manager, the probability for some translations to be DISABLED
in Debian Installer RC1 is very h
On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:34, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> I retried installation on a MacMini (x86) and still got stuck, that
> installing elilo is not possible as there is no evi-vars module
> available (tested the netinst-x86 from September 21) which has a kernel
> form 2.6.17-2 from September
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:17:58AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >
> >>>Also, about the console font corruption with radeonfb, i would be
> >>>interested
> >>>in feedback of if it is a powerpc only issue, or ppc stuff ?
> >>
> >>No idea, i on no
Accepted:
partman-auto-crypto_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_1.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_1.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_1_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_1_all.udeb
Ove
Hi
I retried installation on a MacMini (x86) and still got stuck, that installing
elilo is not possible as there is no evi-vars module available (tested the
netinst-x86 from September 21) which has a kernel form 2.6.17-2 from
September 13.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=38195
On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:48, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
> >
> > I just tried todays Etch beta netinstall install CD with the graphical
> > install (installgui). When the partitioning step is done and the
> > computer starts to actually do
On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:48, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > I just tried todays Etch beta netinstall install CD with the
> > graphical install (installgui). When the partitioning step is done
> > and the computer starts to actually do something in the background
> > (probably writing the parti
On Sunday 24 September 2006 10:17, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Is there an iso I can burn with the necessary stuff on it? I'm not
> set up to do netbooting at this moment.
There is only an iso. Look for gtk-miniiso under powerpc/powerpc64:
http://people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc/daily/
pgpoUCbSel
On Sep 23, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Also, about the console font corruption with radeonfb, i would be
interested
in feedback of if it is a powerpc only issue, or ppc stuff ?
No idea, i on no radeon boards :(
Someone else ?
I might have a NewWorld Mac with a radeon board...
Christoph Haas wrote:
Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
I just tried todays Etch beta netinstall install CD with the graphical
install (installgui). When the partitioning step is done and the computer
starts to actually do something in the background (probably writing the
partition table or mkfs) it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388501 + moreinfo
Bug#388501: Installation Report
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:09:52PM +0200, Frank Guthorel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to let a first generation Compaq Proliant 350 Server run
> Debian, but the 3.1 netinstall CD lets me know that no hard discs are
> available to install it too.
> [ further description of the challenge ]
> tha
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
First, the bad news: GTK 2.10.4 has a broken DFB backend, as an old
bugfix [1] by Mike Emmel icluded in CVS was not relesed, so to get a
working GTKDFB library you'll have to use sources form CVS HEAD.
The link you're givin
67 matches
Mail list logo
