On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> > upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> > them the first tim
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:38, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
> > - linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
> > through t-p-u.
> > - after linux-l
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hmm, 2.10.3 did build, but I can't claim the directfb flavor isn't
broken.
That's correct: i was trying to say that the DFB backend found in GTK+
2.10.3 is broken, while the X backend compiles correctly.
Any idea about when
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
1. switch to 2.10.3 libraries
please note that while GTK+ 2.10.2 should compile correctly, current GTK
in cvs ( and 2.10.3 too, IIRC) won't because it needs something like the
attached patch that mike should be applying in d
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> > upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> > them the first tim
Frans Pop wrote:
Main reason I ask is that there are a few RC issues in the graphical
installer (not crashes, but important presentation issues) that should be
solved in 2.10, but are still present in 2.8.
If the chance that 2.10 will _not_ make Etch is high, then we need to try
to find fixes
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> Should these applications be using gksudo instead? Should gksu be smarter and
> try different ways of getting root [1]? Should d-i do some workaround?
See #382670. This is already implemented, although I didn't test my
side of the implementation yet.
--
see sh
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> them the first time in 2004.
What in the world? Why would you do that anyway?
> Initia
Hi!
d-i now offers the possibility of installing with disabled root logins. If you
do that, the default GNOME desktop is broken because a lot of the links use gksu
instead of gksudo:
/usr/share/applications/gdmsetup.desktop:Exec=gksu gdmsetup
/usr/share/applications/foomatic-gui.desktop:Exec=gk
Title: Nikki
deep understanding of why deep understanding of why that
you can hold your more complex. used in the Java API deep understanding
of why deep understanding of why
his stunningly clever use of Command, that you can hold your about
inheritance might better at solving software
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:35:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388247: fixed in tasksel 2.55
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:35:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386399: fixed in tasksel 2.55
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:35:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386335: fixed in tasksel 2.55
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:32:21PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Can an updated round of d-i screen shots be taken when d-i will use 2.10
> instead of 2.09 ?
I just did it; see [1]
any chance you can test how Hebrew looks like with dejavu?
ATM g-i uses freefont for Hebrew.
regards,
Davide
PS: I i
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.55_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.55_all.deb
tasksel_2.55.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.55.dsc
tasksel_2.55.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.55.tar.gz
tasksel_2.55_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.55_all.deb
Override entries f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 388464 linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6
Bug#388464: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing
lvm-mod
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `linux-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 379525 debconf
Bug#379525: Unfortunate difference between tasksel and aptitude when cd-drive
is empty...
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `debconf'.
>
End of messag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 386244 - unreproducible
Bug#386244: tasksel 'Desktop environment' task hangs
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 388320 rescue
Bug#388320: debian-installer: rescue mode: show software raid devices.
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `rescue'.
>
End of message, stopping p
Loïc Minier wrote:
>In the end, the package doesn't get installed currently despite this
> being the wish of the package maintainer. I'm not sure this is a good
> situation, and I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision.
It might help if you mentioned it to me. Without using loade
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Downloaded on 9/20/06
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:25:27 -0400
Machine: Custom machine w/ SuperMicro X6DHE-XG2 (Intel E75
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.54
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please could you add "desktop-base" to the desktop task? Without it, default
etch installs get a blank background.
diff -ur tasksel-2.54.old/tasks/desktop tasksel-2.54/tasks/desktop
--- tasksel-2.54.old/tasks/desktop 2006-09-01 2
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:40 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:18, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> > I have been reading the docs of translation on the svn and it says i
> > need to ask for svn write access to commit my changes is that still so
> > or i need to send it to somebo
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:28:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388455: debian-installer: installer freezes while
installing portmap
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:18, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> I have been reading the docs of translation on the svn and it says i
> need to ask for svn write access to commit my changes is that still so
> or i need to send it to somebody else. I have just created a guest
> account on alioth as
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:38, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
> - linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
> through t-p-u.
> - after linux-latest-2.6 migrates into testing later today, we will
> upload a new
I have been reading the docs of translation on the svn and it says i
need to ask for svn write access to commit my changes is that still so
or i need to send it to somebody else. I have just created a guest
account on alioth as said on the doc, my username is nxvl-guest.
--
aka nxvl
key fingerpr
Package: debian-installer
Version: beta3
Severity: normal
installer (debian installer beta3 cd) freezes while installing portmap
Sep 18 15:38:44 debconf: Obsolete command TITLE Configuring portmap called
Sep 18 15:41:53 in-target:
killed the .postinst procress. aptitude turned to a zombie proces
Package: debian-installer
Version: Daily build 20060920
Severity: normal
Installing a Dell 1950 Server (x86_64), LVM support is broken as there
is no LVM support in the kernel (-8 or -9, I believe), and no LVM
modules available.
This worked with the i386 installer of the same build (20060920
Hello,
I'm trying to let a first generation Compaq Proliant 350 Server run
Debian, but the 3.1 netinstall CD lets me know that no hard discs are
available to install it too.
I've been looking at HP fora and other resources online, but could not
find a definite answer.
Is there somebody who could
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > Hmm, 2.10.3 did build, but I can't claim the directfb flavor isn't
> > broken.
> That's correct: i was trying to say that the DFB backend found in GTK+
> 2.10.3 is broken, while the X backend compiles correctly.
> Any idea about when 2.10.4 is go
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > Result failed, disk ejected very early, even no red cross displayed.
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_floppy_boot.log
> > says:
Hello,
Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first
upload today.
First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
- linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
through t-p-u.
- after linux-latest-2.6 migrates into testing later today,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >1. switch to 2.10.3 libraries
> please note that while GTK+ 2.10.2 should compile correctly, current GTK
> in cvs ( and 2.10.3 too, IIRC) won't because it needs something like the
> attached patch that mike should be applying in days.
> I think
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> The main question I guess is: is there more information on if/when 2.10
> could migrate to unstable? What is the chance that it will make Etch?
The biggest instability in Gtk 2.10 is due to the new filesystem module
asynchronous implementation. In short
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:50:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388400: installation-report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1
> after dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
> modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
> been addressed in this release
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Etch NetInstall Beta 3 (11 Aug 2006)
Image version: From debian.org website / Beta 3
Date: 20 Sept 2006
Machine: IBM xSeries 306m
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 - 3.2Ghz with Hyperthreading
Memory: 512Mo DDR2 PC 4200
Partitions: That is the problem
Output o
Hi,
Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1 after
dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
been addressed in this release as well.
Here's a quick summary of the import
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> Result failed, disk ejected very early, even no red cross displayed.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_floppy_boot.log
> says:
>
> DOING MIBOOT
> /bin/sh: line 3: miboot: command not found
> MIBOOT
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:22:45PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> tags 388296 pending
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:41:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Can you please check the attached patch and commit it in both ubuntu and
> > debian if it seems ok to you.
> >
> > I did some hand-test
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:55:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:24:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > someone who does the whole stuff, right ? It was an honest question, why do
> > you respond so agressively ?
>
> Maybe because the question was asked in a rather aggr
42 matches
Mail list logo
