reassign 382590 linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
thanks
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I would first like to see it confirmed as it seems like a very strange
regression to me. Jurij will probably look into this this weekend. He's
just back from his holidays.
Indeed, the isofs kernel module is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382590 linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
Bug#382590: debian-installer: sparc testing images missing 32-bit isofs
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:05 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
The proposed RFC allows the dhcp administrator to tailor the response
based on the MAC address of the client. Most won't, but it should be
possible if you want to.
I think you're missing the point that the maintainer of the newly-
instal
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 08:29:12PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Using DHCP will only tell you what the
> >DHCP admin's preferred timezone setting is, which won't necessarily
> >match
> >and also doesn't give you any idea whether the user want
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc32-di | 0.65 | sparc
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc64-di | 0.65 | sparc
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di |1.2 | arm
cdrom-core-modul
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 08:25, Tomasz Grzegurzko wrote:
>> I've just tried three more series from powerpc-miboot. The daily
>> (18-Aug-2006), the beta3 and 24-Jul-2006 (as I couldn't find 23 July)
>> and all failed .
>>
>> It is still the same problem; it c
On Aug 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:47:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
We mainly need to determine how we are going to use rdate:
- for all installations;
- only for some (sub)arches like nlsu;
- only if difference between system date/time and rdate date
On Aug 19, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
Using DHCP will only tell you what the
DHCP admin's preferred timezone setting is, which won't necessarily
match
and also doesn't give you any idea whether the user wants the
system's clock
to be set in UTC or not.
The proposed RFC allow
On Sunday 20 August 2006 01:13, Frans Pop wrote:
> Author: fjp
> Date: Sat Aug 19 23:13:50 2006
> New Revision: 4
^
Another milestone reached...
For comparison:
Rev 35000 - bubulle - 2006-02-19 13:30:41 + (Sun, 19 Feb 2006)
Rev 3 - joeyh- 2005-08-17 16:28:20 +
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383540: fixed in installation-report 2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381863: fixed in hw-detect 1.41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382577: fixed in installation-report 2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
hw-detect_1.41_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.41.dsc
hw-detect_1.41.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.41_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.41_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.41_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.41_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUB
installation-report_2.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.18.dsc
installation-report_2.18.tar.gz
save-logs_2.18_all.udeb
installation-report_2.18_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.08_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.08.dsc
linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6_0.08.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb
nic-e
Accepted:
installation-report_2.18.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.18.dsc
installation-report_2.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.18.tar.gz
installation-report_2.18_all.deb
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.
Accepted:
archdetect_1.41_i386.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.41_i386.udeb
disk-detect_1.41_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.41_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.41_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.41_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.41.dsc
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-detect
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb optional
debian-installer
Esoteric CDROM drivers
This package c
base-installer_1.66_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.66.dsc
base-installer_1.66.tar.gz
base-installer_1.66_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Saturday 19 August 2006 22:12, Joey Hess wrote:
> Moreover, we can remove some of the not very well working code that
> tries to detect smp:
Done.
pgpxIn4Ji1wuE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383557: fixed in base-installer 1.66
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
debian-installer_20050317sarge1_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-manual_20050317sarge1_m68k.deb
debian-installer-images_20050317sarge1_m68k.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
base-installer_1.66.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.66.dsc
base-installer_1.66.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.66.tar.gz
base-installer_1.66_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.66_i386.udeb
Override entries for your pa
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 06:18:40PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:47:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>We mainly need to determine how we are going to use rdate:
> >>- for all installations;
> >>- only for some (sub)arc
On Aug 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:47:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
We mainly need to determine how we are going to use rdate:
- for all installations;
- only for some (sub)arches like nlsu;
- only if difference between system date/time and rdate date
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.9_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.9.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.9.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.17-2-
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb extra debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for th
kernel-wedge_2.26_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.26.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.26.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.26_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_2.26.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.26.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.26.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.26_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.26_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
kernel-wedge_2.
Hi David,
Glad to see you back from holidays.
One general note: we really do have to be careful with this. As we are now
working towards RC releases of d-i, we cannot afford to implement really
risky changes.
The initial feedback from beta 3 shows there is still some work to do on
partman-cry
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:29:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
2) Concerns over an overcrowded partman-auto menu
...
However, I think that we should split it into two screens:
Manually edit partition table
Erase disk and create new partitions
Erase disk(s); use LVM for new partitions
Erase disk(s
Frans Pop wrote:
> Yes, of course. Should have seen that :-P
>
> So we can safely forget about the SMP issue :-)
Moreover, we can remove some of the not very well working code that
tries to detect smp:
rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S04countcpus-linux-x86
(but not S04countcpus-linux
David Härdeman wrote:
> 1) Swap on LVM in partman-auto-lvm
>
> I sent an RFC on this more than a month ago. Not much discussion
> resulted, I got a few positive comments and no negative comments. Is
> this ok to commit?
Not commenting on this just because I don't know anything about it, not
bec
Hello Michael,
On Friday 11 August 2006 17:18, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> My name is Michael Peek, and I've never contributed a darned thing...
> But I'd like to change that. I've written a couple of small udebs that
> I find useful. I'm wondering if they would be useful to anyone else.
First of
On Saturday 19 August 2006 20:41, David Härdeman wrote:
> I'm hoping to get some feedback on whether this is a good idea before I
> commit anything.
What is missing in the patch IMHO is a check if there is actually enough
free memory to load the modules and run crypto before actually doing so.
If
Hi all,
I'd like to start working on getting partman-auto-crypto into d-i again.
As far as I know there are two outstanding issues:
1) Swap on LVM in partman-auto-lvm
I sent an RFC on this more than a month ago. Not much discussion
resulted, I got a few positive comments and no negative com
Does anyone know of an online tutorial, designed for laymen, on how to install and use miBoot? I'm tech-savvy but somewhat obtuse when it comes to compiling and all that, but I can get through the task (which is kind of fun, actually) once I have enough of a starting point. Unfortunately, I'm not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383796 cdebconf
Bug#383796: d-i: too much error screens
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf'.
> retitle 383796 pass-through: Should allow to break of debootstrap on errors
Bug#383796: d-i: too much error screens
Cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383807 linux-2.6
Bug#383807: Missing PCI IDs in the sata_via driver
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383797 - pending
Bug#383797: partman-crypto allows invalid crypto/essiv combinations
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Package: partman-crypto
Version: 9
Followup-For: Bug #383797
Even though the blowfish / 448 bits combination has been disabled, we
still need to add a keysize / ivalgosize check to partman-crypto, so
I'll change the status of this bug accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
reassign 383807 linux-2.6
thanks
On Saturday 19 August 2006 19:46, Julien Louis wrote:
> I was unable to install Debian from both daily build d-i iso image and
> etch d-i beta3 release due to missing PCI IDs in the sata_via driver.
> Can you consider adding the following pci id to the sata_via dri
reassign 383807 linux-2.6
thanks
* Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-19 19:46]:
> I was unable to install Debian from both daily build d-i iso image and etch
> d-i
> beta3 release due to missing PCI IDs in the sata_via driver. Can you consider
> adding
> the following pci id to the sata_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> unmerge 383797
Bug#383797: partman-crypto allows invalid crypto/essiv combinations
Bug#381981: Configuration fails with blowfish / 448 bits
Disconnected #383797 from all other report(
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:47:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We mainly need to determine how we are going to use rdate:
> - for all installations;
> - only for some (sub)arches like nlsu;
> - only if difference between system date/time and rdate date/time is
> greater than x.
> Seems to me ther
Hi,
before I want on vacation I whipped up the attached patch which changes
partman-crypto to do "on-demand" loading of components. The result is
that it doesn't use memory if not used at the expense of additional
downloads during partitioning if encryption is desired.
I'm hoping to get some
On Friday 18 August 2006 19:53, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > If I understand FS correctly, the 486 flavor of the kernel is still
> > UP, which means that we still have the same problem in the
> > installer...
>
> Well, the installer won't know it's a smp system, but if it installs a
> 68
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD-ROM
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso
Date: 19/08/2006
Machine: MSI K9VGM-V with an amd64 3500+ processor
Partitions: none
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Why don't you try interacting with me before making assumptions?
> I have explained the reasons why Sven was removed from the project often
> enough and also that it was _not_ because of personal dislike.
For someone who had no personal
Hi,
On Saturday 19 August 2006 16:17, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: how would I know
> you are subscribed? ;)
Thanks for caring! :)
Of course you cannot know if someone is subscribed. But you can know that the
default is not to cc: people and assu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 381981 by 381973 383797
Bug#381981: Configuration fails with blowfish / 448 bits
Was blocked by: 381973 383797
Blocking bugs of 381981 removed: 381973, 383797
> merge 381981 383797
Bug#381981: Configuration fails with blowfish / 448 bits
Bug#38
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I am also really afraid to interact with Frans, because I would rather
> > not be treated as dipshit like Sven was. :(
>
> Frans is a nice guy. Just don't constantly throw dipshit like Sven did and
> neither Frans nor anybody else
On Saturday 19 August 2006 11:14, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 01:31, Paul Brook wrote:
> > The sparc boot image on the etch beta-3 businesscard and netinst CDs
> > does not contain the isofs module for 32-bit kernels.
> > This makes the cds effectively useless on 32-bit sparc
Hallo, people. Let me use this my bug to describe graphic version
Interface is very good, nice done. A clock will be nice addition.
-- network kernel and initrd from HD set didn't work, i used ones from miniso
copied on usb stick and booted with grub from there.
-- Mouse as touchpad as usb o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 381973 cryptsetup
Bug#381973: cryptsetup: segfaults in luksOpen with -c blowfish-cbc-essiv:sha256
-s 448
Bug reassigned from package `partman-crypto' to `cryptsetup'.
> clone 381973 -1
Bug#381973: cryptsetup: segfaults in luksOpen with -c blo
This question is better asked on the debian-cd list.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Bittorrent and etch beta 3 CD/DVD
Date: Saturday 19 August 2006 05:24
From: Don Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-boot
Currently, under i386 at least, the CD or DVD for [1]beta 3 of d-i i
On Saturday 19 August 2006 14:05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> I did not mean it is low priority. ;) I meant we are not paid
> Canonical employees to do a job following a timeline.
Not sure what this has to do with things as practically nobody on this
project is employed by Canonical. I know I'm not.
reassign 381973 cryptsetup
clone 381973 -1
reassign -1 partman-crypto
retitle -1 partman-crypto allows invalid crypto/essiv combinations
retitle 381973 cryptsetup segfaults with invalid parameters
thanks
I think this bug report shows two bugs:
1) partman-crypto allows invalid cipher lengths and
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: beta 3
Date: 20060819
Machine: SGI Indigo2
Processor: R4400SC 200 MHz
Memory: 256 MB
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
No PCI bus.
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
> lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
> annoying. Thanks.
Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: h
On Saturday 19 August 2006 15:50, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> - It basically seems to work and is very small.
Which is a big plus.
> - Somtimes rdate doesn't work, but this applies both to busybox and
>the stand-alone variant. I get errors like "69.25.96.13 did not
>send the complete tim
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 14:14]:
> Can I assume that the d-i group settled on using either rdate or a
> minimal sntp client rather than ntpdate?
I've tried rdate now. Here are my observations:
- It basically seems to work and is very small.
- Somtimes rdate doesn't w
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:04:08AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> 3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
> today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
>
> >start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
> >
>
> Since I'm afraid that the Linux t
Hi Aurélien,
please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
annoying. Thanks.
On Saturday 19 August 2006 14:05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > > Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
> > Hard to say, since Piotr and I
Hi,
On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
> Hard to say, since Piotr and I have no deadline... :)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mea
Hi,
On Saturday 12 August 2006 01:31, Paul Brook wrote:
> The sparc boot image on the etch beta-3 businesscard and netinst CDs
> does not contain the isofs module for 32-bit kernels.
> This makes the cds effectively useless on 32-bit sparc machines as teh
> installer can't mount the cd. The SCSI
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:04:08AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Since I'm afraid that the Linux team isn't doing anything to update
> linux-2.6 in testing and that nothing else feels responsible for doing
> so, I'm initiating the discussion. I request the release team to force a
> linux-2.6
Hi,
3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but
got no answer. I didn't see anything happen a
69 matches
Mail list logo
