reopen 382891
thank
Frans Pop wrote:
> the following packages require the user to enter information during the
> package installation portion of the installation:
>
> aspell
> exim
> xorg
>
> there may have been more than this. this is bad for usability because
> the user has to manually attend
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 382891
Bug#382891: different package configuration in g-i and d-i?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
reopen 382886
thank
Frans Pop wrote:
> this is a request for a simple digital clock (placed in probably the
> top-right corner) at all times during the graphical-installer.
Thanks for the suggestion, but I suggest you buy a watch instead.
Cheers,
FJP
should this not be marked wontfix? actua
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 382888
Bug#382888: debian-installer: needs install continuation capability
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
reopen 382888
thank
> if for some reason my debian installation fails (due to power outage,
> bad media, etc), the installer should be capable of parsing the logs
> from the failed install, and pick up where it left off.
>
> i understand that this could be a rather difficult feature to
> impleme
> During a new installation I noticed that the installation was "hanging"
> for quite a while during the installation of portmap.
This seems to be caused by the network configuration. I was seeing it for
some installs and not for others. The difference is in the /etc/hosts
file generated for DH
On Friday 18 August 2006 01:08, dann frazier wrote:
> So, when the isolinux bootloader started, I couldn't see anything
> until I hit F1, which then took me to a text-mode isolinux menu with a
> boot prompt. I then had to boot with fb=false in order to continue
> the install in text mode. (thanks
On Friday 18 August 2006 01:04, dann frazier wrote:
> I just noticed that d-i chose to install a 686 kernel instead of a
> 686-smp kernel. Of course, with a non-SMP kernel installed
> /proc/cpuinfo only shows 1 CPU. But, after I installed the SMP flavor
> it has:
That's a known issue. Unfortunatel
reassign 383557 base-installer
tags 383557 + pending
thanks
On Friday 18 August 2006 01:56, dann frazier wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> It nearly completed base-install, but failed installing a kernel
> because it was trying to install initrd-tools for some reason.
>
> As you can see below, it chos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383557 base-installer
Bug#383557: installation-report: [ia64] HP Integrity rx2600
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
> tags 383557 + pending
Bug#383557: installation-report: [ia64] HP Integrity rx2600
There
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.17
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/ia64/iso-cd/debian-testing-ia64-netinst.iso
Date: 20060817
Machine: HP Integrity rx2600 [ia64]
Partitions:
Filesystem
I just noticed that d-i chose to install a 686 kernel instead of a
686-smp kernel. Of course, with a non-SMP kernel installed
/proc/cpuinfo only shows 1 CPU. But, after I installed the SMP flavor
it has:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
mo
Oh, and something I forgot...
I installed using the ssh interface on this ProLiant's iLO, a remote
management controller. However, this interface only allows you to
interact with text-mode consoles.
So, when the isolinux bootloader started, I couldn't see anything
until I hit F1, which then took
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:15:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383548: debian-installer: "Go back" option didnt work as
expected
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Otavio and I discussed this privately on IRC yesterday and I was able to
better articulate my reasons against the current patch.
Basically I don't think that CDDs should rely on preseeding to customize
the installer so fundamentally at run-time. If such customizing is needed
(and I do agree tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package installation-report save-logs
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: save-logs installation-report
> tags 383540 + pending
Bug#383540: installation-report: vague question - "Use inst
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap
Frans Pop wrote:
> > lpr is installed by debootstrap since it's currently priority standard.
> > IMHO there's not much excuse to include lpr in standard.
>
> I don't think that is true: lpr is listed in /target/var/log/aptitude, so
> I think it is installed as part of the "standard" task, not deb
Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378868: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.17
"Use installation logs from another location?"
Should I answer this question with a yes/no? Should I give it a path?
It might be good to give an example answer in brackets:
[yes/no]
[/path/to/log]
etc
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Or
Michael Vogt wrote:
> While I agree that apt should be more careful in checking if the proxy
> that was entered is valid I think the real bug here is that apt-setup
> writes a Acquire::http::proxy "false" entry. This apt configuration
> variable should be either a valid proxy or not set at all.
I'
apt-setup_0.15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.15.dsc
apt-setup_0.15.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.15_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.15_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.15_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.15_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.15_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.15_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.15_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.15_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.15.dsc
to poo
Package: base-config
Version: 2.53.10
Severity: critical
File: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
I'd like to inform you that I was very surprized to seee testing urls in
my /etc/apt/sources.list afte I only runned apt-setup to try another
mirror (skynet.be instead of
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 8-11-2006 amd64 etch daily build netinstall cd
image from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Linux physa 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8 #1 Sun Jul 16 01:27:59 CEST 2006
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: 8-11-2006
Method: Bott
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: net install via cdrom
Image version: amd64 net install 17 august 2006 22:00 downloaded on debian website
Date: 17 august 2006 23:00
Machine:
Processor:celeron 64bit 2.56Ghz
Memory:1024MB
Partitions:
Sys. de fich. Type1K-blocs Occupé Dispo
(new) crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.77_m68k.udeb extra debian-installer
crypto modules
This package contains crypto modules.
(new) crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-mac-di_0.77_m68k.udeb extra debian-installer
crypto modules
This package contains crypto modules.
(new) fat-modules-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.7
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.77_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.77.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.77.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.17-2
"Iuri Sampaio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>But I reinstalled my windows OS and now I lost lilo boot loader and I
>can boot my linux.
>
>Do you know a way to get into my debian box? Then I am able to install
>lilo over again on the master boot sector or even better to install it
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 381085 netcfg
Bug#381085: portmap: causes freeze during installation
Bug reassigned from package `portmap' to `netcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
partman-base_93_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_93.dsc
partman-base_93.tar.gz
partman-base_93_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Accepted:
partman-base_93.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_93.dsc
partman-base_93.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_93.tar.gz
partman-base_93_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_93_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-base_93.dsc - s
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:43, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> > Unless you wish to use the disk you are partitioning from Tru64 Unix
> > or one of the free 4.4BSD-Lite derived operating systems (FreeBSD,
> > OpenBSD, or NetBSD), it is suggest
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383486 initramfs-tools
Bug#383486: DAC960 module not loaded following install
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `initramfs-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
reassign 383486 initramfs-tools
thanks
On Thursday 17 August 2006 17:37, Tim Small wrote:
> Following installation of Etch, using the Beta 3 installer (netinst CD
> image), installation runs to completion without error, on reboot, grub
> appears fine, and the kernel loads, but during boot hangs wi
Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:00:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Accepted base-installer 1.65 (source i386)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:37:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:05:35PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> But missing the driver megaraid legacy and qla2300 on the cdrom
to get qla2xxx drivers working, you need the firmware images from
non-free. A first build is in experimental:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmwar
base-installer_1.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.65.dsc
base-installer_1.65.tar.gz
base-installer_1.65_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Hello Sven
Yes, I know that the qla23xx need a firmware but the megaraid no, and
for install my debian I need only the megaraid module.
I extract the megaraid.ko and via a busybox I download this file with
wget.
but the installer continue to say me no disks :-( (I see in the menu
lists the meg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383135 + fixed
Bug#383135: base-installer: Please support the ppc64 architecture
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tag 383135 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:33:24 +0200
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer
Architecture: source
Package: installation
Version: Etch Beta 3
Following installation of Etch, using the Beta 3 installer (netinst CD
image), installation runs to completion without error, on reboot, grub
appears fine, and the kernel loads, but during boot hangs with something
like "waiting for root filesystem".
Accepted:
base-installer_1.65.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.65.dsc
base-installer_1.65.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.65.tar.gz
base-installer_1.65_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.65_i386.udeb
Override entries for your pa
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:05:35PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
> I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
> debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
> But missing the driver megaraid legacy and qla2300 on
On Thursday 17 August 2006 17:11, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:17, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > But I have a mckinley (itanium2) and not itanium.
>
> Does not mean anything to me, but as there are no separate kernel
> images for itanium2, I'd expect they are either supported by the
>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:11:23PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> The megaraid.ko are available under the mckinley and itanium kernel-image
> Guy
Well, :
$ grep MEGA arch/*
arch/config:CONFIG_MEGARAID_SAS=m
$ grep MEGA arch/i386/*
arch/i386/config:CONFIG_MEGARAID_NEWGEN=y
arch/i386/config:CONFIG_ME
On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:17, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> But I have a mckinley (itanium2) and not itanium.
Does not mean anything to me, but as there are no separate kernel images
for itanium2, I'd expect they are either supported by the itanium kernel
or not supported at all.
pgpLxv0MGZs13.pgp
The megaraid.ko are available under the mckinley and itanium kernel-image
Guy
Sven Luther a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 17 August 2006 15:05, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
>>
>>> I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:43, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> Unless you wish to use the disk you are partitioning from Tru64 Unix
> or one of the free 4.4BSD-Lite derived operating systems (FreeBSD,
> OpenBSD, or NetBSD), it is suggested that you do
> not make the third partition contain the whole
> d
Now no need .i got it from a site
http://www.debian.org/releases/3.1/i386/ch04s03.html.en
bye
On 8/17/06, jose antony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How install debian3 of 100mb burned CD image -to bootable disk
.
cuntly running win xp.side by side possible
P3 micro installed.128 mb ram.40 GB h
I do not understand the following paragraph in partitioning.po.
Unless you wish to use the disk you are partitioning from Tru64 Unix
or one of the free 4.4BSD-Lite derived operating systems (FreeBSD,
OpenBSD, or NetBSD), it is suggested that you do
not make the third partition contain the whole
di
On Thursday 17 August 2006 15:43, jose antony wrote:
> cuntly running win xp.side by side possible
Yes, installing Debian alongside Windows is supported.
> P3 micro installed.128 mb ram.40 GB hard drive.
> how to begin now.Explain the tweak way to install
I'm sorry, but I cannot understand what
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 15:05, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
> > I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
> > debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
> > But m
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Thursday 17 August 2006 15:05, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
But missing the driver megaraid legacy and
How install debian3 of 100mb burned CD image -to bootable disk
.
cuntly running win xp.side by side possible
P3 micro installed.128 mb ram.40 GB hard drive.
how to begin now.Explain the tweak way to install
CAn you
From INDIA
jose antony
thnx in advance
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thursday 17 August 2006 15:05, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
> I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
> debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
> But missing the driver megaraid legacy and qla2300 on the cdrom
>
> could
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 14:14]:
> Can I assume that the d-i group settled on using either rdate or a
> minimal sntp client rather than ntpdate?
Sorry, I havent had time to try out rdate now. Please leave this bug
report open for now but don't do anything until you hear
Hello,
I have 2 days to install debian etch on our production server.
I download the last daily build of the cdrom (release
debian-testing-ia64-netinstall.iso 20060815).
But missing the driver megaraid legacy and qla2300 on the cdrom
It's my last chance to migrate our redhat to debian
could you
Can I assume that the d-i group settled on using either rdate or a
minimal sntp client rather than ntpdate?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:17:18AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > we should finally agree on which kernel version we want to release etch
> > with, and on an appropriate timeframe.
> >
> > The goal should be obvious: release Etch on December, 4th.
On 17/08/06, Stephen Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am interested in using the first two udebs (cfg-netcfg and
cfg-partman). How do I get a copy of them? How do I set up ETCH to use them?
If you want the binaries you can grab them from the mirrors (under
debian-installer, instead of debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 359150 kernel-wedge
Bug#359150: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6: Please add crypto-modules udeb
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6' to `kernel-wedge'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
tags 358001 - patch
thanks
An alternative to providing ext2prepare is to remove tune2fs. If
/sbin/tune2fs isn't available, partman-ext3 will use the code path
calling mkfs.ext3, and thus generate file systems with the
resize_inode option enabled.
I'm testing this approach now in debian-ed, beca
65 matches
Mail list logo
