Bug#380416: lilo fails to install when using XFS root partition on AMD64

Package: lilo-installer Version: 1.16 I'm using the latest daily build of the AMD64 netinst CD. I have a single SATA drive, and I selected "use entire drive" in the partitioner and it created one large root partition and one swap partition. Then I changed the root partition to XFS. There was a

Bug#142881: %CATCHY

I would like to offer you the opportunity to minimize your monthly rent/mort payments by more than 33%. We guarantee to beat your current rate, below are some of todays. $955,000 at 3,95% $435,000 at 4,15% $195,000 at 3,55% $432,000 at 4,55% Please follow the link below to the best investment

base-installer_1.64_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_1.64.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.64.dsc base-installer_1.64.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.64.tar.gz base-installer_1.64_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.64_i386.udeb Override entries for your pa

Processing of base-installer_1.64_i386.changes

base-installer_1.64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_1.64.dsc base-installer_1.64.tar.gz base-installer_1.64_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#380082: marked as done (shouldn't always use snd-powermac)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:47:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380082: fixed in hw-detect 1.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processing of hw-detect_1.40_i386.changes

hw-detect_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hw-detect_1.40.dsc hw-detect_1.40.tar.gz ethdetect_1.40_all.udeb disk-detect_1.40_all.udeb hw-detect_1.40_i386.udeb archdetect_1.40_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUB

Processing of finish-install_2.4_i386.changes

finish-install_2.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: finish-install_2.4.dsc finish-install_2.4.tar.gz finish-install_2.4_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

hw-detect_1.40_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: archdetect_1.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.40_i386.udeb disk-detect_1.40_all.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.40_all.udeb ethdetect_1.40_all.udeb to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.40_all.udeb hw-detect_1.40.dsc to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-detect

finish-install_2.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: finish-install_2.4.dsc to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.4.dsc finish-install_2.4.tar.gz to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.4.tar.gz finish-install_2.4_all.udeb to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.4_all.udeb Override entries for your package: f

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

Frans Pop wrote: > Reason is that libcairo still depends on -24 and thus d-i builds currently > fail as that version is no longer available. > Also, this means that the new directfb has to migrate to testing before we > can release d-i, which in turn means that all packages that depend on > dire

Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc

On a i386 is lspci present in the recent builds op debian-installer. While the installer waits for a keyboard selection, I switched to the second console and typed `lspci` and got the output of lspci. Could this be verified on a powerpc computer? (no need to do a re-installed ( no computer harm

Processed: Re: Bug#372734: baseconfig will not be in etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # AFAIK is baseconfig not in etch > tags 372734 sarge Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not contain a 'Template:' line Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#372734: baseconfig will not be in etch

# AFAIK is baseconfig not in etch tags 372734 sarge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#369793: triage

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 369793 net-retriever Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full Bug reassigned from package `net-retriever' to `net-retriever'. > tags 369793 moreinfo Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable t

Processed: Re: Bug#369793: triage

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 369793 net-retriever Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `net-retriever'. > tag 369793 moreinfo Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever un

Bug#372196: marked as done (installation-reports: Installing debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (Etch) dies at "Installing Base System" step)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:43:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372196: installation-reports: Installing debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (Etch) dies at "Installing Base System" step has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full

On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:13:18PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > Boot method: USB stick > Image version: stable (Sarge) > Date: June, 1st 2006 - 12AM GMT > > > I'm trying to install Debian

Bug#372734: Processed: tagging Bug#372734 patched

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:33:36AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > tags 372734 patch > Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not > contain a 'Template:' line > There were no tags set. > Tags added: pat

Processed: tagging Bug#372734 patched

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 372734 patch Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not contain a 'Template:' line There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#380238: marked as done (installation-reports: IBM Thinkpad 240)

Hi vagrant, Thanks for your feedback. You wrote: > i first tried to use the alternate encryption method (loop-aes?), which > failed for some reason, so instead i used the dmsetup version (which > i think was the default), which worked fine. Could you describe at which point the loop-AES method

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

On Saturday 29 July 2006 16:01, Frans Pop wrote: > You uploaded a new upstream version of directfb a few days ago (or > rather, it was accepted a few days ago), and I'm afraid that looks > likely to completely mess up the Beta 3 release plans for the > installer. The alternative is to release Beta

Not very happy with new directfb upload

Hi Guillem, I do not want to blame you or anything, but I do need your help to get things sorted out. You uploaded a new upstream version of directfb a few days ago (or rather, it was accepted a few days ago), and I'm afraid that looks likely to completely mess up the Beta 3 release plans for

Bug#380351: hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rending them "unmovable"

severity 380351 important thanks I fail to see how this is an RC issue. pgpyyZlQ1xYXq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#380351: hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rending them "unmovable"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 380351 important Bug#380351: hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rending them "unmovable" Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#380351: hardcodes paths to grub-install and update-grub, rending them "unmovable"

Package: grub-installer Severity: grave Tags: patch Using absolute paths can have horrid consequences as you've seen in #361929. Now grub commands are "trapped" into violating FHS and being unable to move at the same time. Please find attached patch to switch to relative paths when invoking grub-

Please update debconf PO translation for the package debconf 1.5.4

Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for debconf. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

Re: Packages have unmet dependencies error during installation

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 10:36:20AM +0200, Vanhuynegem Frank wrote: > Hey, > > > > Perhaps this error was already reported but I couldn't find it. Sorry! > > I've downloaded the ISO files from the ftp.belnet.be > site > > This error occurs when you select the packages to

Please update debconf PO translation for the package popularity-contest

Hi, you are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for popularity-contest. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated fil

Packages have unmet dependencies error during installation

Hey,   Perhaps this error was already reported but I couldn’t find it. Sorry! I’ve downloaded the ISO files from the ftp.belnet.be site This error occurs when you select the packages to install desktop configuration and web services as well when you choose the language Dutch (nederlands