FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON

I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON- JulianPThurston Thurston

xfbdev

Hi anybody knows how to run Xfbdev without keyboard support on a arm based PDA,I compiled for xkdrive. when I try to run I am getting a error: fatal server error: xf86OpenConsoleInit: VT_GETMODE failed waiting for the reply regarJoey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: tag 352713 + fixedquitThis

Xfbdev without keyboard support -VT_GETMODE failed error

Hi anybody knows how to run Xfbdev without keyboard support on a arm based PDA,I compiled for xkdrive. when I try to run I am getting a error: fatal server error: xf86OpenConsoleInit: VT_GETMODE failed waiting for the reply regarJoey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: tag 352713 + fixedquitThis

Processing of linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.18_powerpc.changes

serial-modules-2.6.16-2-powerpc-di_1.18_powerpc.udeb doesn't exist scsi-modules-2.6.16-2-powerpc-di_1.18_powerpc.udeb doesn't exist nic-extra-modules-2.6.16-2-powerpc64-di_1.18_powerpc.udeb doesn't exist floppy-modules-2.6.16-2-powerpc64-di_1.18_powerpc.udeb doesn't exist xfs-modules-2.6.16-2-power

Bug#377752: installation report

Package: installation-reportsthis report is in the attachment.i don't know how to copy and past it with my current setup.i have bugreport installed, but linix email is a complete mystery to me. in previous installation report, i copy it "upstairs" to mac os wherei knew how to insert a file into ema

Bug#377747: tasksel dies refusing to install untrusted packages...

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: Date: CD -- netinst > Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd > Name Last modified Size > > Parent Directory

Processing of linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.0_arm.changes

linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.0_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.0.dsc linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.0.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.0_arm.udeb nic-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.0_arm.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.6.16-2-

linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.0_arm.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.0_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.0_arm.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-s3c2410-di_1.0_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-s3c2410-di_1.0

user-setup_1.3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: user-setup-udeb_1.3_all.udeb to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.3_all.udeb user-setup_1.3.dsc to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.3.dsc user-setup_1.3.tar.gz to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.3.tar.gz user-setup_1.3_all.deb to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.

Fixed in NMU of user-setup 1.3

tag 352713 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:23:44 -0400 Source: user-setup Binary: user-setup user-setup-udeb Architecture

Processing of user-setup_1.3_i386.changes

user-setup_1.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: user-setup_1.3.dsc user-setup_1.3.tar.gz user-setup-udeb_1.3_all.udeb user-setup_1.3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#288452: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (prep method is now there, as 301668 documents this (and another prep-breakage in partman but still))

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday 09 July 2006 09:02, Sven Luther wrote: > > > #301668 documents that creating a prep partition still doesnt fully work > > > (actually this needs to be checked if that bug is still open... oh well), > >

Bug#377658: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: <07/07/2006> Date: <07/07/2006> Machine: Processor:centrino duo Memory: 1GB Partitions: Output of lspci and lspci -n: see attached file Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't tr

Bug#297001: Persönlich !

Elfenbeinküste. Mein liebes,  Es ist mein Vergnügen, mit Ihnen für ein Unternehmen in Verbindung zu treten, das Ich und mein Schwester,Janet beabsichtigen, in Ihrem Land herzustellen. obwohl ich Sie nicht getroffen habe.  Ich habe Menge von Eigtht Million US Dollars ($8,000,000.00) welch mein spät

Bug#375161: partman-lvm: check LV and VG names before trying to create them

Frans Pop wrote: Is there any way the two templates can be combined? They are very similar and having 60+ translations of them is not very appealing, especially as they will be only rarely used. Ok, I've attached a new version of the patch which merges the two templates. Beside the template n

Processed: Re: Bug#377504: installation-report: problem pick'n'mix, mostly RAID-related

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 377504 debian-installer Bug#377504: installation-report: problem pick'n'mix, mostly RAID-related Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'. > retitle 377504 D-I usability comments (from "expert" viewpoint) Bug#37

Bug#377606: hw-detect: Redundant listing of hotpluggable network interfaces

Package: hw-detect Version: 1.38 Severity: minor After the first hw-detection (ethdetect) run for networking (mini.iso) using 2.6.16 kernel and udev, I end up with the following in /etc/network/devhotplug: lo eth0 eth1 lo eth0 eth1 eth0 eth1 lo It looks like hw-detect is somewhat redundant in cr

Bug#377504: installation-report: problem pick'n'mix, mostly RAID-related

Hi, thanks for the quick and detailed answer. Installation and installed system are basically two different things. If you want a different priority from the default, just run 'dpkg-reconfigure debconf'. With all due respect, I don't really agree - the installed system is the result of the ins

Bug#377582: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:16:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377582: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#375968: marked as done (etch beta2 netboot fails on VIA VT310DP)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:11:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375968: etch beta2 netboot fails on VIA VT310DP has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#375968: etch beta2 netboot fails on VIA VT310DP

Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 10 July 2006 03:56, Nick Phillips wrote: > >> I did; the daily booted and installed (don't have the date of the >> daily to hand at the moment) but the kernel installed during the >> installation did not boot. >> > > That can be explained because the installed

Bug#377582: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: < 2006-05-21 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso > Date: < 2006-05-29 > Machine: < desktop MB ATIA3/M1535D > Processor: Duron 1300 Memory: 256 Mb Partitions: debian on /dev/hda2

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge3_i386.changes

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge3.dsc linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge3.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge3_i386.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge3_i386.udeb ni