Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to install Etch using last cd from 12.06.2006
Note thah I do not have access to online mirror on that PC and use "expert" mode
Installation silently fails after step "Choose and install software" - it will
j
The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
Saturday June 17th 16:00 UTC.
The meeting will happen on #debian-boot ON irc.debian.org, NOT, I
REPEAT, NOT on irc.freenode.net.
This meeting will mostly be centered about the next release schedule,
with regards of the general Etch re
I did a bit more reading, and learned that md does store a signature
on the drive, so I tried blanking the MBRs on both drives. For some
reason, this didn't work -- but blanking the drives completely did
resolve the problem. The md arrays are now detected and mounted
properly, and the system boots
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:02:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373650: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.28
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
kbd-chooser_1.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_1.28.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.28.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.28_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_1.28.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.28.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.28.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.28.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.28_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.28_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closi
On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> > On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> >> > Hello all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.dsc
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.16etch1_all.udeb
Announcing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 373621 linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
Bug#373621: debian-installer: netboot fails on Sun V100, errors from dmfe
network driver
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.dsc
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_1.16etch1_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
(new) prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.dsc required debian-installer
(new) prebaseconfig_1.16etch1.tar.gz required debian-installer
(new) prebaseconfig_1.16etch1_all.udeb required debian-installer
Finish the installation and reboot
finish the installation and reboot
Changes: prebaseconfig (1.16etch1) testi
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Gary Fredrickson wrote:
> I am trying to setup a preseed file to partition / as 300 MB, 5GB /usr,
> 3 GB for /var, 10 GB for /tmp, 3 GB for swap and the remaining space on
> the drive for /data all using reiserfs format. Searching the internet
> for how to
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:42:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370043: fixed in linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc32-di_1.10_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc32-di_1.10_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc64-di_1.10_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc64
Hi all,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Aiet, Paras,
>
> Since we activated Georgian/Nepali in the Debian Installer, we got no
> feedback about the rendering in the graphical version.
I noticed Georgian was not among the languages supported by the spellchecke
On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:42, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> -generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
> scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
> 2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
So what do you choose if you need a kernel that supports both? Both are
non-obv
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-amd6
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
-generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
scheme completely, and call the flavo
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
1. partman-auto-lvm no longer works
If I choose that option there is no error, but nothing actually happens.
After some time the main partitioning screen is shown, but no new
partitions have been created.
And here's the patch that sho
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:07:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > The 2.4/2.6 netboot ("boot.img") images do not work on the Sun Fire
> > V100. This is caused by the network driver ("dmfe") repeatedly
> > giving the following errors:
> Nowhere in this bug report do you say what version of the install
Matthew Newton wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
>
>
> The 2.4/2.6 netboot ("boot.img") images do not work on the Sun Fire
> V100. This is caused by the network driver ("dmfe") repeatedly
> giving the following errors:
>
> SABRE0: PCI SERR signal asserted.
> SABRE0: PC
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
>> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
>
> It's also easier to reintroduce split packages if necessary.
And should not need changes in base-installe
Christophe Chisogne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> I'm just looking at the changes in LVM and RAID and I'm wondering what the
>> status is. How well has the new code been tested?
>
> I had very serious issues with lvm management (Etch d-i beta2 and 2006-06-12).
>
> My config lo
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 22:20, Gary Fredrickson wrote:
> I am trying to setup a preseed file to partition / as 300 MB, 5GB /usr,
> 3 GB for /var, 10 GB for /tmp, 3 GB for swap and the remaining space on
> the drive for /data all using reiserfs format. Searching the internet
> for how to use exper
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to use the bootkbd option for preselecting the keyboard type,
but it just hangs and requires enter to be pressed.
- at the syslinux prompt, I type
install bootkbd=fr-latin9
- the kernel boots up, udev starts, the frame buffer is set
I am trying to setup a preseed file to partition / as 300 MB,
5GB /usr, 3 GB for /var, 10 GB for /tmp, 3 GB for swap and the remaining space
on the drive for /data all using reiserfs format. Searching the internet for how
to use expert_recipe and the field meanings yielded nothing. Any I
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I also wonder if the templates asking for the VG name and showing this
error should not be "critical" as no default exists.
Is there any reason not to have all the questions and error messages as
critical? It is an interactive script a
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:46:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Which architectures include support for i2o_block?
according to the kernel sources, all architectures which do support PCI.
> And if dpt_i2o does
> the same thing for i386, whouldn't we include i2o_block only for those
> archit
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:46:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Which architectures include support for i2o_block?
>
> according to the kernel sources, all architectures which do support PCI.
>
> > And if dpt_i2o does
> > the same thing for i386, whouldn't w
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:19, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The version in unstable support it.
Ack. Otherwise the bug would have also shown in daily builds...
This does not help with this BR though which concerns images built using
Beta2 initrds which contain an older version of busybox.
So, even
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Christophe Chisogne wrote:
By not using root on lvm on raid, I naively thought that it'll avoid
boot problems etc, but I was very wrong.
1. partman wanted to update the partition table on /dev/md2,
which seemed to lead to big problems (like cat /proc/m
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
2. test for existing physical volume name is broken
After entering a name for a physical volume I always get a screen saying
the name is already in use.
The problem seems to be in this code in choose_partition/lvm/do_option:
# Ch
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 June 2006 13:51, Frans Pop wrote:
> > This is probably the result of prebaseconfig being removed from testing
> > and being replaced by finish-install.
> Hmm. Looks like the finish-install postinst uses sort in a way unsup
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.10_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.10.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.10.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-sparc64-di_1.10_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc64-di_1.10_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.1
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:32:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This list appears to be identical to the one in kernel-wedge except
> you've removed dpt_i2o, which was only included if the module was built,
> which it is not for either i386 or presumably, amd64. So, what's the
> point of dupli
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc32-di_1.10_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sparc64-di_1.10_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDR
Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Update scsi-modules list: use a modified list from kernel-wedge.
> ---
> trunk/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/modules/amd64/scsi-extra-modules
> (original)
> +++
> trunk/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/modules/amd64/scsi-extra-modules
> Wed Jun
In nic-extra-modules, the amd64 package diverges from kernel-wedge by
not including these modules:
smc-ultra tlan ne ne2 ni5010 ni52 ni65 lne390 lp486e ibmtr lance hp-plus
eepro e2100 82596 ac3200 at1700 cs89x0 depca 3c501 3c503 3c505 3c507 3c509
3c515 3c523 3c527 eexpress es3210 eth16i ewrk3 smc-
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb extra
debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.9.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.9.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.9_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-
Steve, you're right that we should ditch de4x5 from all the 2.6
packages (at least assuming that it's not in modules.pcimap on other
arches; I only checked i386, and this module has in the past been used
on some arches and not others).
And it does need to stay in the 2.4 udebs at least for some ar
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 13:51, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is probably the result of prebaseconfig being removed from testing
> and being replaced by finish-install.
Hmm. Looks like the finish-install postinst uses sort in a way unsupported
by the busybox version used in beta2 initrds...
main-menu
Package: autopartkit
Severity: important
Hi
The package doesn't work on the current daily build from debian-edu.
It tries to do partitioning on the cd device.
The cd device must be in the result from choose_device(), I am not sure
if it is the only result. :(
As far as I could see autopartkit com
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:33:30AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
> experimental debs for it at:
> http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
I performed the very same tests run with the 1.1.6:
- built an image of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
The 2.4/2.6 netboot ("boot.img") images do not work on the Sun Fire
V100. This is caused by the network driver ("dmfe") repeatedly
giving the following errors:
SABRE0: PCI SERR signal asserted.
SABRE0: PCI bus error, PCI_STATUS[caa0]
eth1: Tx t
I believe Frans Pop closed it last night...
jeff
P.S. Though I'd be happy to close these things myself in the future if
that's what's desired, through the bug page...I assume, otherwise
someone one might send me a skeleton close (mail msg) that I can stash
for future use.
Otavio Salvador wr
Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm just looking at the changes in LVM and RAID and I'm wondering what the
> status is. How well has the new code been tested?
I had very serious issues with lvm management (Etch d-i beta2 and 2006-06-12).
My config looks like the following.
RAID 1 /dev/md0 (/dev/sda1, /dev/s
Aiet, Paras,
Since we activated Georgian/Nepali in the Debian Installer, we got no
feedback about the rendering in the graphical version.
Could you try one of the daily build images
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 373567 finish-install
Bug#373567: etch d-i i386 beta 2 failed to finish installation correctly
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `finish-install'.
> severity 373567 grave
Bug#373567: etch d-i i386 beta 2 failed to finish in
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 14:23, David Härdeman wrote:
> I tested it until I could find no more bugs before I committed it to
> SVN. I also posted to the list asking for review and comments before
> committing. The changes for partman-lvm (essentially rewriting and
> merging lvm-tools.sh from lvmcf
Jeff Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The partitioner works beautifully in the most recent build (CD label
> date of 2006-06-12). The install had other probs further along that
> I'll discuss in an install report...tomorrow.
Maybe you could close the bug, then?
--
O T A V I OS A
reassign 373586 finish-install
severity 373586 grave
merge 373567 373586
thanks
> The main problem happened at the end with the "finish install" step. As
> above it just
> flashed a window and returned to the menu.
Yep, we just got, a few minutes before yours, another report about
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 373586 finish-install
Bug#373586: PMac install - probs w/ finish install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `finish-install'.
> severity 373586 grave
Bug#373586: PMac install - probs w/ finish install
Severity set to `grave'
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> I would suggest keeping the name amd64-generic. It is easier for users
> to see that -generic fits all than -k8.
It's also easier to reintroduce split packages if necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:55:53AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in
> >experimental?
> >>
> >> It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it
> >-
> >> and
On Wed, June 14, 2006 11:40, Frans Pop said:
> I'm just looking at the changes in LVM and RAID and I'm wondering what the
> status is. How well has the new code been tested?
I tested it until I could find no more bugs before I committed it to SVN.
I also posted to the list asking for review and co
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 12 Jun 06 - testing (etch) jigdo cd(#1)
uname -a: Linux naro 2.6.15-1-powerpc #2 Mon Mar 6 12:39:17 CET 2006 ppc
GNU/Linux
Date: 13 Jun 06
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from w
reassign 373567 finish-install
severity 373567 grave
thanks
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 12:15, Artem Poushkin wrote:
> I tried to install etch using d-i etch beta 2, as recommended on
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> Started network installation from floppies, everything seemed fine
I'm just looking at the changes in LVM and RAID and I'm wondering what the
status is. How well has the new code been tested?
A fairly quick test using the current daily for LVM shows at least three
important errors. As we will now be moving towards a new beta release, it
would be nice to have t
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably non D-I udebs should be on this list, too. (I personally have
fixed this for ppp-udeb and hope to publish it tonight, after some
testing).
I am sorry, I couldn't make this happen due to some problems with the
internet connection I u
Hello all,
I have reported this issue for about a week and I don't know yet if is
related to #372773, but the G-I interface (powerpc daily image)
crashes and I haven't seen anybody interested in fixing this issue.
Can somebody confirm/infirm this?
Tests have been ran on a PowerBook5,2.
I have
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:36:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372187: Partitioner Fixed in 2006-06-12 build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
63 matches
Mail list logo
