Hello, On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:32:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > This list appears to be identical to the one in kernel-wedge except > you've removed dpt_i2o, which was only included if the module was built, > which it is not for either i386 or presumably, amd64. So, what's the > point of duplicating all this from kernel-wedge in a second place that > we have to try to keep in sync now?
I added i2o_block and i2o_scsi to the list. > If kernel-wedge lists a module that should not be included on some > architecture, despite being built there, then the best way to fix it is > to move that module from the common list to the lists for the arches that > do have a reason to include it. Or you can even just exclude it from the > included file: > > #include <scsi-extra-modules> > dpt_i2o - I should look better at kernel-wedge, I guess. Thanks for the hint, I'll fix my changes right away. Best regards Freerik Schueler -- ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
