Hello all,
The patch is not ready yet because there are some things I
have to fix.
I have taken the time look over the ppp-udeb and I tried to test it to
see what happens on a practical case. I saw that the postinst failed
and realised the templates were not emebdded in the udeb.
So I fixed t
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 06:57 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
[snip]
> I wonder whether we could have a kind of compromise here:
>
> -keep the current behaviour when a regular mirror has been chosen
>
> -at least ask for a proxy for security.d.o when the mirror settings
> have been entered manual
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm thinking it might be good to run apt with a shorter timeout for http
> connections the first time apt-setup runs. The default timeout is 120
> seconds. A 60 second timeout would probably work here, I'm not sure how
> low it could go before giving bad res
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 07:02:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366754: Successfull install of debian testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The benefits I can think of from commenting out apt-src lines are:
>
> - Faster installation time, doesn't have to download Sources.gz.
> - Marginally faster apt-get update time. Now that apt in unstable uses
> diffs, this is unlikely to be worth commenti
> > 1) Ask before attempting to get security updates. (Obviously default to
> > yes).
>
> There's no good reason to ask. If the machine is network connected it
> should make every possible effort to use security updates, doing
> anything else is asking to be insecure.
>
> If you really want to d
Quoting Shane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello list,
>
> Has anyone had luck installing Sarge on an Intel i945
> chipset. The linux26 target isn't picking up the ethernet
> controller, I tried e1000 but that doesn't seem to be it
> and it also doesn't detect the connected SATA disks. I
> believe it'
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> > tags 366715 wontfix
> Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
> security.debian.org
>
Hi,
A new version of parted is about ready to enter testing and should do so
to clear the way for a next parted upload that has a bit more impact,
including an ABI change.
Otavio (as parted maintainer) is OK with the migration.
The current version of parted in unstable adds RAID support for Spa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 366715 wontfix
Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
security.debian.org
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stoppi
John Winters wrote:
> >
> > > 1) Ask before attempting to get security updates. (Obviously default to
> > > yes).
> >
> > There's no good reason to ask.
>
> Well, no - clearly there is a good reason to ask.
>
> > If the machine is network connected it
> > should make every possible effort to
Something like the attached patch should suffice. Is it acceptable?
Index: debian/postinst
===
--- debian/postinst (revision 37157)
+++ debian/postinst (working copy)
@@ -330,6 +330,8 @@
major=$(grep
David Härdeman wrote:
> Not my bug report, but I'm seeing similar error messages...
I have no idea if you're seeing the same problem as the thread head, but
I've reproduced your problem and filed a bug report on nfs-common to get
it fixed.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> Using the current version of ttf-dejavu (2.4.1-1) the frontend crashes
> when dejavu is set as default font but if freefont is set as default font,
> all languages displayed via dejavu 2.4.1-1 just work fine.
if it can be of any help I
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:19:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this
> error pops up.
Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used
netinst CD image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb
I'm thinking it might be good to run apt with a shorter timeout for http
connections the first time apt-setup runs. The default timeout is 120
seconds. A 60 second timeout would probably work here, I'm not sure how
low it could go before giving bad results.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descripti
The benefits I can think of from commenting out apt-src lines are:
- Faster installation time, doesn't have to download Sources.gz.
- Marginally faster apt-get update time. Now that apt in unstable uses
diffs, this is unlikely to be worth commenting them out even for
dialup users.
- Slightly l
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Network, netinst CD image
Image version: etch beta 2
Date: 7th May 2006 17:25
Machine: Custom built by woc.co.uk
Processor: Intel P4 630
Memory: 1G
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 reiserfs195
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 16:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> John Winters wrote:
> > I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
> > within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
> >
> > Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
> > the main packages
FYI: The status of the installation-guide source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20060102
Current version: 20060427
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more info
After spending some time trying to switch g-i as to use ttf-dejavu as
default font, I'm writing down the infos I collected so far hoping
someone will help getting it to work.
The current set of fonts uses ttf-freefont as default and a very old
version of dejavu font (IIRC something lik 2.2); for m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> reassign 366715 apt-setup
Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
security.debian.org
Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `apt-setup
John Winters wrote:
> I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
> within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
>
> Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
> the main packages it then tries to use a hard-coded source (presumably
> security.
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-10 16:18]:
> There's also an offer from Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to help
> in an assisting role, mostly on oldworld. Noone has replied to that mail
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yet though.
To be fair, Sven responded to it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this
> > error pops up.
>
> Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used
> netinst CD image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb is
> actually in both) but I have the exact same pr
Anthony Towns wrote:
> I expect we'll shortly need to look seriously into getting a few more
> people actively working on maintaining the powerpc port as well; at the
> moment we seem to be relying on Sven to do everything, and that's not
> really ideal.
Well, Colin has been doing work on powerpc
2006/5/9, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This is a "consistent mapping of device names for disk drives"
>problem.
>
>The disk drive is mapped as sdb during the installation step but sda
>when the real system boots up.
>
>I suggest you switch to VT2 at the very end of
reassign 366441 debian-installer
tag 366441 pending
thanks
This is not a problem in mklibs but in d-i.
The d-i (the Makefile) fails to tell mklibs to check libs with a name
*.so.* for symbols that are needed.
The patch below in the Makefile fixes this.
--- build/Makefile (revision 37141)
+
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 366441 debian-installer
Bug#366441: Mklibs: should not remove symbol iconv_open
Bug reassigned from package `mklibs' to `debian-installer'.
> tag 366441 pending
Bug#366441: Mklibs: should not remove symbol iconv_open
Tags were: d-i
Tags added:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:58:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64 ?
>
> I'll try and tell you
Nice! I'll be happy with just one copy to the mailinglist
(no need to CC me ;-)
> (USB booting with hd-media/boot.img.gz only, I'm against the CD's the
> And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64 ?
I'll try and tell you (USB booting with hd-media/boot.img.gz only, I'm against
the CD's theory..)
Tonight if I have enough time : my playing with i386 installer broke some part
of my system hard disk partition table. No files lost, I'm just tranfer
Package: installation-report
Severity: important
I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
the main packages it then tries to use a hard-coded source (p
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:09:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Mmmm, another amd64 ...
>
> Oh, I forgot to say that I'm using only i386 images to install
> (on an AMD64 plateform yes !).
And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64?
Your feedback is appreciated.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
-
> Mmmm, another amd64 ...
Oh, I forgot to say that I'm using only i386 images to install (on an AMD64
plateform yes !).
> There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this error pops
> up.
Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used netinst CD
image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb is actually in both) but I
have the exact same problem..
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:42:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> > In any case working with less tension should be done.
> > But do you think, it's interesting for Sven to work in this way.
>
> What's "interesting for Sven" isn't rea
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> In any case working with less tension should be done.
> But do you think, it's interesting for Sven to work in this way.
What's "interesting for Sven" isn't really a consideration, what's
reasonable and efficient is. Once this has be
I get the same error on Ubuntu 5.10 as well.
I have tried with a different type of compact flash card and get the
same error.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all,
As I suspect you're all already aware, on 27th April, Sven Luther asked
me to review the situation with d-i and powerpc as a result of finding
his commit access to the d-i repository had been removed. Having spent
some time since then seeing what's been going on, I've concluded that
remov
On 16:38 Wed 10 May , Anthony Towns wrote:
> Frans has already indicated he and Colin should be able to commit any
> patches Sven sends along in a reasonably timely fashion; and I'm hopeful
> that the structured cooperation via NMUs and the BTS should provide some
> practice so that you guys ca
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> As I suspect you're all already aware, on 27th April, Sven Luther asked
> me to review the situation with d-i and powerpc as a result of finding
> his commit access to the d-i repository had been removed. Having spent
>
Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366653: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
42 matches
Mail list logo
