Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366653: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 03 May 2006
ftp://ftp.citylink.co.nz/debian/dists/Debian3.1r2/main/installer-i386/20050305/images/netboot/mini.iso
uname -a: Linux helium.locallan 2.4.32 #1 Wed May 10 14:43:13 NZST
2006 i686 GNU/Linux <- source downloaded from kernel.org and custom
compiled the "Debian" way
Date: 09 May 2006
Method: Bootable CDROM netboot/mini.iso & FTP from ftp.citylink.co.nz
Machine: HP D530 SFF
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 512mb DDR 333
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 34 273073+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 35 14593 116945167+ 5 Extended
/dev/hda5 35 642 4883728+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 643 1007 2931831 83 Linux
/dev/hda7 1008 1197 1526143+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/hda8 1198 1246 393561 83 Linux
/dev/hda9 1247 14593 107209746 83 Linux
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 250M 57M 180M 24% / (EXT3)
tmpfs 249M 0 249M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda9 103G 3.5M 103G 1% /home (XFS)
/dev/hda8 380M 272K 380M 1% /tmp (XFS)
/dev/hda5 4.7G 751M 4.0G 16% /usr (XFS)
/dev/hda6 2.8G 99M 2.7G 4% /var (XFS)
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM
Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02)
0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82865G Integrated
Graphics Device (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB
UHCI #1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB
UHCI #2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB
UHCI #3 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2
EHCI Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra
ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB (ICH5) Serial ATA 150
Storage Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER
(ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
0000:05:02.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme
BCM5782 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03)
0000:05:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M
[Tornado] (rev 78)
lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02)
0000:00:02.0 0300: 8086:2572 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.2 0101: 8086:24d1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02)
0000:05:02.0 0200: 14e4:1696 (rev 03)
0000:05:09.0 0200: 10b7:9200 (rev 78)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Trouble free install. network configuration automatically tries DHCP,
would be nice if it asked you to try DHCP or manual - even thou I have
DHCP on the LAN I installed the box with, I have to Go Back and
manually configure the Gateway to a different one to get a direct
route
out to the internet.
I use XFS for my filesystems because its simply better than ext3,
maybe the installer could offer some basic information on each FS
Getting a 2.6 Kernel to work with Sarge is not a simple process, I
either have module problems, or kernel panic's on boot. I have stuck
with the most
recent 2.4 kernel, this was a breeze to configure, compile and
install. Default kernel has a lot of stuff enabled that I just dont
and wont ever need.
Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Trouble free install. network configuration automatically tries DHCP,
> would be nice if it asked you to try DHCP or manual - even thou I have
> DHCP on the LAN I installed the box with, I have to Go Back and
> manually configure the Gateway to a different one to get a direct
> route
> out to the internet.
This is asked at lower priority (expert installs). This is on purpose
to minimize the number of questions asked to users.
>
> I use XFS for my filesystems because its simply better than ext3,
> maybe the installer could offer some basic information on each FS
This probably more belongs to the installer documentation than the
installer itself.
> Getting a 2.6 Kernel to work with Sarge is not a simple process, I
> either have module problems, or kernel panic's on boot. I have stuck
> with the most
> recent 2.4 kernel, this was a breeze to configure, compile and
> install. Default kernel has a lot of stuff enabled that I just dont
> and wont ever need.
If 2.4 works for you with sarge, I actually see no real reason to
switch to 2.6 unless you need some of its features..:-)
Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as
usual with reports for successful installations: I close the bug..:-)
This does not of course mean you weren't right to report. Knowing the
installations are correct is important for the d-i team.
Many thanks for your time testing the Debian Installer and reporting
your results. Have fun with your new Debian system!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
