Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break
> install
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> **
> *** hu ***
> **
It appears that the translations still were containing pasted values
from the msgid.
I have corrected this.
Portuguese has already been fixed by Superfast Miguel.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> #: ../common.templates:69
> msgid ""
> "Canada/Newfoundland, Canada/Atlantic, Canada/Eastern, Canada/Central,
> Canada/"
> "East-Saskatchewan, Canada/Saskatchewan, Canada/Mountain, Canada/Pacific, "
> "Canada/Yukon"
> msgstr ""
> "Newfoundland, Atlan
#: ../common.templates:69
msgid ""
"Canada/Newfoundland, Canada/Atlantic, Canada/Eastern, Canada/Central,
Canada/"
"East-Saskatchewan, Canada/Saskatchewan, Canada/Mountain, Canada/Pacific, "
"Canada/Yukon"
msgstr ""
"Newfoundland, Atlantic, Eastern, Central, East-Saskatchewan,
Saskatchewan, "
"Moun
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:55:26PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
> previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
OK.
>
> On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > I d
You're still replying to all kinds of addresses you don't need to...
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:05, Jack Carroll wrote:
> modprobe 3c509 xcvr=3
> ifup eth0
Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give you the
option to enter module parameters wh
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 00:03, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm not completely sure about this patch. In theory it could break
> installs when apt-setup is called after base-installer has run if
> sources added by apt-setup contain packages with e.g. ABI upgrades
> which makes it necessary to remove the old
On Sunday 09 April 2006 10:01, Christian Perrier wrote:
> It's been a while since tasksel is no more localized (at least when
> shown to users...of course, it's i18n'ed)).
Issue traced, see #361872.
pgpCPcXXHuE2E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> So, if you'd just accept the 2.4 kernel offered by default, the
> installation will go fine. You can upgrade to a 2.6 kernel after the
> installation finishes.
This procedure worked with a PCI network board (3c59x). The
int
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361180 important
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.97
Severity: serious
When debconf-copydb is run from pkgsel's postinst script, it deletes the
existing /var/cache/debconf/templates.dat in /target; after it has run
only copied templates are present.
This results in the problem that has been reported that tasksel is
Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
> I don't see any particular reason why an
> installer shouldn't run under a 2.4 kernel, b
On Monday 10 April 2006 23:47, Frans Pop wrote:
> --- trunk/packages/debian-installer-utils/apt-install (original)
> +++ trunk/packages/debian-installer-utils/apt-install
> export DEBIAN_FRONTEND
>
> ERRCODE=0
> -log-output -t apt-install chroot /target apt-get -y install
> $@ < /dev/null || ERR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 361180 -1
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Bug 361180 cloned as bug 361870.
> reassign -1 debian-installer-utils
Bug#361870: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using
retitle 361180 base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4
will break install
severity 361180 normal
thanks
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> If you'd just done a default installation instead of choosing expert mode,
> none of this would have ha
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 361180 base-installer
> retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
> thanks
>
> On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
> > That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 361180 base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4
> will break install
Bug#361180: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
Changed Bug title.
> severity 361180 normal
Bug#361180: base-installer: Se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break
> install
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
reassign 361180 base-installer
retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
> That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
> can move the log to disk and attach it to this message.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 361180 base-installer
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
> retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
Unknown command or ma
Hi Miguel,
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:11:08PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> #: ../common.templates:69
> msgid ""
> "Canada/Newfoundland, Canada/Atlantic, Canada/Eastern, Canada/Central,
> Canada/"
> "East-Saskatchewan, Canada/Saskatchewan, Canada/Mountain, Canada/Pacific, "
> "Canada/Yukon"
>
I have some time today, so I'll resume work on the problem.
You two gentlemen seem to stay up amazingly late at night.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
>
> For a pair of root.img and
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
>
> That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
> can move the log to disk and attach it to this message. Just copying a few
> key items from the screen on the test machine:
> It happens at the 93% p
I did some more tests to spot errors in tzsetup (see [1])
Turns out that both pt and hu need to be fixed:
**
*** pt ***
**
#. Type: select
#. Choices
#. Timezones for CA.
#.
#. TRANSLATORS PLEASE NOTE: The msgid below looks strange because it is
#. a list of filenames (in /usr/sha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:26:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #337011: installation-guide: Please document the new ways to
preseed root and user passwords
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
directfb-0.9-22_0.9.22-10.dsc
directfb-0.9-22_0.9.22-10.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:25:08, th
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:57:23PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 06:14, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Sure, feel free to upload and change the maintainer if it does not
> > bother you (the udeb bug can be closed with your upload).
>
> OK. I have prepared the packages and am ready to
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> No, the boot Beta 2 boot floppy should be usable with daily images. After
> all, that's all it does: boot the installer. I don't see how it could
> result in the installer deleting files near the end of the install.
> If it would hav
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> For Geert: access floppies are a totally different set of floppies from
> the regular ones (allow use of braille terminals for blind people).
Added to this BR.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Monday 10 April 2006 06:14, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Sure, feel free to upload and change the maintainer if it does not
> bother you (the udeb bug can be closed with your upload).
OK. I have prepared the packages and am ready to upload. However, I think
you will have to upload first as otherwise
Hi Franziska,
this is a English list so I answer (partly in) English.
Am Montag, 10. April 2006 11:37 schrieb Franziska Schröder:
> ich würde gerne bei Übersetzungen helfen.
It's really nice that you want to help translating
Debian into German. I CC:ed the German list and we should discuss every
Quoting Franziska Schröder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hallo,
>
> ich würde gerne bei Übersetzungen helfen.
>
> Ich benutze Debian zu Hause und würde mich freuen, es unterstützen zu
> können.
>
> Außderdem bin ich gelernte Fremdsprachenkorrespondentin und würde so
> gerne mein Englisch auf aktuelle
Hallo,
ich würde gerne bei Übersetzungen helfen.
Ich benutze Debian zu Hause und würde mich freuen, es unterstützen zu
können.
Außderdem bin ich gelernte Fremdsprachenkorrespondentin und würde so
gerne mein Englisch auf aktuellem Stand halten.
Ich freue mich schon auf eine Antwort.
Gruß
F
On Monday 10 April 2006 02:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
> I speculated that the reason for the error might be that the daily
> builds did not include a boot.img floppy, and the root.img and
> net-drivers.img that were provided might not be compatible with the
> Etch RC2 boot.img. Until that quest
Package: debian-installer-manual
Version: svn
Severity: important
Hello,
This BR is a spin-off of #361180.
Skip to the bottom of this message for the actual request.
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:03:37PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> I speculated that the reason for the error might be that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361180 important
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
severity 361180 important
thanks mate
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:03:37PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > I have no clue what you are trying to tell.
> >
> > Please rephrase your original challenge.
> > And send it to the mail
39 matches
Mail list logo
