Hallo! Du (Frans Pop) hast geschrieben:
> The debian-boot list is plagued by subscriptions from this "list" as can
> be seen from:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/03/threads.html#00012
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/03/msg00016.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006
Thanks for your comments.
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 00:06, Joey Hess wrote:
> > 1) Add a boolean preseedable option debian-installer/no_net
> [...]
> For netcfg, what is the advantage of skipping the short dhcp test? A
> static config would also not be very useful if there is really no
> NIC.
Y
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain
> > available in testing after all regular binaries that depend on it
> > have been rebuilt against libsysfs2?
>
> No,
Unsubscription from list:
promozione su guide cartacee
is successful.
If you would like to subscribe to promozione su guide cartacee
in the future, just click this link:
http://www.vivicatania.net/cgi-bin/lista/mojo.cgi?f=n&l=tantiauguri&[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&p=8238
- [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello! Thanks for subscribing.
Here's information about promozione su guide cartacee
that was given by the list owner:
3° edizione di TANTIAUGURI la guida alle festività natalizie
Private Policy:
You might want to save this email for future reference.
You can unsubscribe anytime
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 360815 installation-reports
Bug#360815: netinst: S/390 with virtual QDIO device fails to start network
device on boot
Warning: Unknown package 'installations-reports'
Bug reassigned from package `installations-reports' to `installation-reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 360815 installations-reports
Bug#360815: netinst: S/390 with virtual QDIO device fails to start network
device on boot
Warning: Unknown package 'installations-reports'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installations-report
Package: netinst
Version: base-network
Severity: important
Using etch Beta 2: installation goes OK, but network device is not picked
up on reboot. This seems to be because "alias eth0 qeth" is commented out
in /etc/modules.conf, and although "qeth" is present in /etc/modules, it is
not loaded a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 360815 installation-reports
Bug#360815: netinst: S/390 with virtual QDIO device fails to start network
device on boot
Warning: Unknown package 'netinst'
Bug reassigned from
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:46:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360430: Bugswhat else?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Frans Pop wrote:
> 1) Add a boolean preseedable option debian-installer/no_net
> If this option is set on boot the following will happen:
> - netcfg will not go into dhcp by default, but default to static config
> - choose-mirror will be skipped, unless /cdrom/.disk/base_installable
> is not pres
Hello Frans,
At this point I have considered your suggestions carefully and
concur in the concept that the current Debian installer just won't
handle complex raid systems (many comments all over the net).
Unfortunately, I am not yet able to persue the beta installer due to my
own ignoranc
On Thursday 30 March 2006 00:11, Frans Pop wrote:
> During installation at medium priority some udebs are now listed that
> were not listed before:
> - debian-edu-install-udeb
> - debian-edu-profile-udeb
> - ltsp-client-builder
The explanation for these turns out to be very simple: they are not
a
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition,
> > so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing.
> Will the libsysfs1 packages,
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition,
> so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing.
Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain available in
testing after all re
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0700, Frank J Niertit wrote:
> Package: install
> Version: N/A; reported 2006-04-04
> Severity: critical
>
> When attempting to install Debian Sarge from a SATA CDROM the installation
> CD will boot and get to the point where it is trying to load a CDROM driver.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Severity 360805 normal
Bug#360805: install: Unable to install from SATA CDROM
Severity set to `normal'.
> Tags 360805 moreinfo
Bug#360805: install: Unable to install from SATA CDROM
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processi
Severity 360805 normal
Tags 360805 moreinfo
stop
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0700, Frank J Niertit wrote:
> Package: install
> Version: N/A; reported 2006-04-04
> Severity: critical
>
> When attempting to install Debian Sarge from a SATA CDROM the installation
> CD will boot and get to th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 360805 normal
Bug#360805: install: Unable to install from SATA CDROM
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:20:47PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 21:49, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Most likely a hick-up in the build system (the error occures on a
> > home made image).
>
> Let's close the BR then.
Also removed from the Today page on the wiki
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:33:15AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any
> problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the
> time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail
> just 2 days
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 21:49, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Most likely a hick-up in the build system (the error occures on a
> home made image).
Let's close the BR then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With Beta 2 we have lost the option to (easily) install without using a
network connection. There have been several comments about this.
This proposal is intended to support that option again.
It is intended primairily for full CD installs (including hd-media where a
full CD image is used).
It c
Package: install
Version: N/A; reported 2006-04-04
Severity: critical
When attempting to install Debian Sarge from a SATA CDROM the installation
CD will boot and get to the point where it is trying to load a CDROM driver.
It then either hangs or asks for a floppy containing drivers for the CDROM.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:51:47PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Xavier,
>
> I was trying to build the gtk-miniiso with an additionnal packages.
>
>
> 2971 symbols, 58 unresolved
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/mklibs", line 444, in ?
> raise "No library p
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:44:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown symbol mii_nway_restart
> > Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown symbol mii_ethtool_gset
>
> eepro100 and e100 both depend on the mii module, which is included in
>
Hi,
I was trying to build the gtk-miniiso with an additionnal packages.
So, my package depends to
libparted1.6-udeb, libglib2.0-udeb, libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb
I add it into localudebs/ and put it into pkg-lists/gtk-common file
During the build, this error appears :
Object: ./tmp/gtk-miniiso
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On a computer where d-i works fine with 2.6.15, it doesn't work with 2.6.16.
> The NIC module is not loaded.
>
> Debian-Installer syslog says:
>
> Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown symbol mii_ethtool_sset
> Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown symbol mii_link_ok
> netbooting is the correct way on those, and the only tested way.
>
> > And the CDs are supposed to boot on the RS6000?
>
> They should, but there seems to be some issue that need investigating. I fixed
> something (missing icon) recently, so the daily builds and beta2 should be
> better than sarg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 356105 + pending
Bug#356105: Should not allow user to select unstable for netinst/full CD
installs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
General tip: when you reply to a mail, don't put a > in front of the lines
_you_ add. The > is used to indicate a quoted text from the mail you
reply to. Multiple > indicate increasingly older mails in the thread.
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 00:00, Zoro wrote:
> If this "bug report" attempt is
an new polished anna.c patch
Index: anna.c
===
--- anna.c (révision 36041)
+++ anna.c (copie de travail)
@@ -65,20 +65,24 @@
}
static int choose_modules(di_packages *status, di_packages **packages) {
- char *choose_
Joey Hess wrote:
> Philip Hands wrote:
>
>>Of course, since going down this route, I've also created a script
>>(dsd_fetch_file) that includes the fetching code from preseed to allow
>>scripts to easily grab files from the same source as the preseed files -- I
>>think if we split the code in prese
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:39, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Frans Pop, our respected Release Manager and, AFAIK, Joey Hess, our
>> equally respected Former Release Manager, will be there for Debcamp.
>
> That is correct. Both Joey and I will be there during
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 360717 apt-setup
Bug#360717: installation-report: mirror selection not available for security
updates
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `apt-setup'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
reassign 360717 apt-setup
thanks
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 13:07, Florent Angebault wrote:
> The problem is that I'm not asked the Debian mirror I want to use for
> the security updates. And unfortunately, the LAN is behind a proxy.
> Therefore it is impossible to download anything from
> security
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 13:49, Max Haase wrote:
> I've downloaded several versions of Debian and burnt the CDs or DVDs,
> this last one is 3 DVDs... I even tried a network install...
Why don't you start by telling us _exactly_ which version of the installer
you have downloaded. We have about 150
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:13:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Thanks for your extensive, well researched and well written report
The merit is not mine, I translated (and edited) the report from a co-worker
:-)
> That said, this won't be fixed for Sarge anymore and the installer for
> Etch no l
I've downloaded several versions of Debian and burnt the CDs or DVDs, this
last one is 3 DVDs... I even tried a network install... I get messages like
this:
"
No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a missmatch between
the kernel used by this version of the installer and the kern
clone 360699 -1
reassign -1 discover1
retitle -1 Entries in exception lists should overrule default lists
tags -1 + d-i
thanks
Hi Javier,
Thanks for your extensive, well researched and well written report
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 11:17, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Network config issu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 360699 -1
Bug#360699: installation-reports: Installation on Sun Netra X1
Bug 360699 cloned as bug 360719.
> reassign -1 discover1
Bug#360719: installation-reports: Installation on Sun Netra X1
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.14
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
(netinst 120MB)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:33:45 +0200
Machine: irrelevant infor
Max Vozeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The usual caveat about these builds not being production-ready and
> audited apply. Please use them only when if you intend to test them
> and/or develop partman-crypto, NOT for production use.
...
> Anyways, let me know in case you find any problems with th
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: RARP/TFTP
Image version:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/2.6/
07-Mar-2005 01:32 5.3M boot.img
Date: 2nd April 2006
Machine: Sun Netra X1
Processor:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 02:40, Geert Stappers wrote:
> | 491 symbols, 439 unresolved
> | Library not found: libsysfs.so.2 in path:
> | ./tmp/netboot_2.6/tree/usr/lib:./tmp/netboot_2.6/udeblibs:
What udeb depends on libsysfs2?
pgprFCFpfF1ov.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:52:31AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> partman-cryptobuilt daily from SVN
> gnupg-udebbuilt manually with patch from #NN
^^^
Oops. This should be #321948 :-)
cheers,
Max
--
To UNSUB
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:39, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Frans Pop, our respected Release Manager and, AFAIK, Joey Hess, our
> equally respected Former Release Manager, will be there for Debcamp.
That is correct. Both Joey and I will be there during Debcamp. However,
only two people present doe
Hi all,
for the past few days I've been testing a setup of daily builds of
partman-crypto enabled d-i. It seems to be working fine, so I'm ready
to have other people try and use it :-)
The builds are done for the netboot and hd-media targets on i386.
They include some extra packages compared to
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've seem this mentioned before. From a previous thread on d-x I
> understood that fr-latin9 is obsolete and that fr should be used. Denis
> can probably give the details.
>
> Louis-Maurice: was fr-latin9 set by default or did you enter that
> yourself?
50 matches
Mail list logo
