Accepted:
archdetect_1.13_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_1.13_hppa.udeb
ddetect_1.13.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.13.dsc
ddetect_1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.13.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_1.13_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_1.13_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and th
ddetect_1.13_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_1.13.dsc
ddetect_1.13.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.13_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_1.13_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.13_hppa.udeb
archdetect_1.13_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:36:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289843: Bogus confirmed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:31:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290549: Rescue-System missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1, downloaded with jigdo in October 2004
uname -a: unknown
Date: 13.1.2005 (was an old image, I know)
Method: Booting by CD
Machine: Compaq desktop
Processor: P3
Memory: 512M
Root Device: /dev/hda3
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda1 = /
> Question 2: are you subscribed to debian-boot?
THis was "debian-i18n", not "debian-boot" for question 2. Stupid cut/paste !
On Friday 14 January 2005 20:20, Sven Luther wrote:
> I can provide the pegasos stuff, and now that i have a prep box, maybe
> also the prep stuff, which may be in some way similar to the IBM rs6k
> stuff. Colin can (or did) provide the newworld stuff.
If you can, please do so asap as then transla
In mid-December, I initiated a mini-poll among registered d-i
translators (indeed people I have in my own records, registered as
"coordinator" for each language).
The purpose was trying to figure out what would be the best way to
communicate together.
I started this because I knew that several t
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:58:05PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On which kind of powerpc ? It is different on each one, but i will try to
> > contribute some stuff for the pegasos case which is of interest to you i
> > think.
>
> I'm specifically trying to get pegasos to work,
Sven Luther wrote:
> On which kind of powerpc ? It is different on each one, but i will try to
> contribute some stuff for the pegasos case which is of interest to you i
> think.
I'm specifically trying to get pegasos to work, but generally interested
in making sure that most or all powerpc users
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:56:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290494: Installation success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
This bug is bogus - problem was the result of a faulty memory stick.
Deepest apologies for wasting your time.
/JS
Of course, you do realize you can edit the /etc/aboot.conf file and add
the console=ttyS0 to the end of the each line to re-enable
boot dka0 -fl 0
aboot will read the same thing from the aboot.conf that it will take in
the -flags string.
Not that it wouldn't be nice to have some magic in the ab
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:09:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290373: Debian Installation Report Template
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:11:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290407: installation-reports: Successful installation on
Shuttle XPC SN85 G4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 14 Jan 2005
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux viper 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Fri Jan 01 12:40
Method: Installed fro
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:47:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Are there any docs on how to netboot a powerpc (from an i386 server if
> it matters) to d-i? The install manual just waves its hands and says to
> set up yaboot with a file that I cannot find anywhere.
On which kind of powerpc ? It is di
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 07:29:19PM +0100, Joerg Stephan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> i attached a first HowTo how you can install debian
> on Umax.
What about contributing to the debian-installer installation manual instead ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are
> >
> > mips and mipsel have been updated.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:47:01AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I'm not even sure that hppa installs are really well tested, by the
> > way. Joey could tell more and this probably needs more input from him.
> > He may even correct me if I'm completely wrong.
> So all I c
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Unfortunately, and as far as I can tell, there hasn't been much
> activity and interaction with the d-i team about this. So, it turns
> out that the 2.6/installer combination is very likely to be nearly
> untested. Having hppa installs be really tested was already a
> cha
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:47:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260814: fixed in srm-reader 0.07
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:47:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279610: fixed in srm-reader 0.07
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:47:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279610: fixed in srm-reader 0.07
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
25 matches
Mail list logo
