> The kernel seems to load correctly, but when I get to the first
> installation screen "Please choose your language" the keyboard is
> completely frozen. The keyboard connected to the machine is the default
> SUN usb keyboard. I notice during the kernel boot that the usbkbd module
> is loaded.
>
>
> Comments/Problems:
> base-config failed on taskselect --> aptitude. There are entries in
> /var/log/base-config.log like this:
>
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> E: Unable to correct dependencies,
> - upload to unstable
> Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully autobuilt.
> Disadvantage: Any sarge fixes would have to go through t-p-u,
> which does not currently have a full set of autobuilders
> and is still not fully functional per the la
> Your log contains
> debconf (developer): <-- SUBST apt-setup/country countries wprowad 1/4
> informacj? r?cznie, Australia, Austria, Belgia, Bia³oru¶, Brazylia...
> The first item is the translation of "enter information manually" but it
> is transcoded into ISO-8859-1, And indeed, po/pl.po
> There are a lot of s390 builds still missing in this chain, so it will be
> some time yet before this particular fix finds its way into testing.
OK, thanks for the analysis. Answering to your question on IRC, the
demo of the BabelBox is planned for early February, so I still have
plenty of tim
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.03_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.03_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_0.03_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.03_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.03.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.03.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_0.03_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_0.03_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.8-1
Paul Telford wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> >It's very wrong on at least my a500, causes a crash with the 2.4 kernel
> >after base install. See bug #282814.
>
> I've seen it I reported it. ;)
283754 rather
> FWIW, CONFIG_DE4X5 does seem to be available in 2.6 s
Steve Langasek wrote:
> partman-auto is arch: all, actually, which makes the alpha recipe breakage
> more annoying to fix no matter which way you slice it.
Ok, still it seems fixable by removing recipes-alpha/multi_user
> > If these are representative of the type of problems we'll be dealing
> >
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:49:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > At the end of the install, a user session is automagically opened and
> > I intend to get a nice sound saying "Hello and welcome to your new
> > Debian system"...in the current language. The session is a GNome
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - linux-kernel-di-: Upload to t-p-u, does not need autobuild,
> no problem.
> - debian-installer: We'd not upload development version of this
> even if unstable were open for developmental uploads, because it's
> only uplo
On Nov 30, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
It's very wrong on at least my a500, causes a crash with the 2.4 kernel
after base install. See bug #282814.
I've seen it I reported it. ;)
Did the system you installed with 2.6 boot up ok? Was de4x5 loaded by
discover then, or is the module not a
Paul Telford wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Paul Telford wrote:
> > > :00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
> > > 21142/43 (rev 30)
> > > :00:14.0 0200: 1011:0019 (rev 30)
> >
> > discover1 wants to load de4x5 for this. Is that wrong?
>
> * SYSTEM ALERT **
> ALERT LEVEL: 6 = Boot possible, pending failure - action required
> REASON FOR ALERT
> SOURCE: 8 = I/O
> SOURCE DETAIL: 6 = disk SOURCE ID: 0
>
> I accepted this alert, and it went on to boot linux. So what does this alert
> mean, anyone know? Any w
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: today's hppa netboot daily build
Method: Netbooted, installed from my local sarge mirror.
Machine: hppa a500 (I think, it's not mine)
Processor: dual 550 mhz PA8600
Memory: 1994 mb
Root Device: /dev/sda5
Root Size/partition
This thread died out without a conclusion and now that the svn
repository is branched, it's more urgent that we find a way to test
things in it. Here's a summary of the proposals, I've added updates
from the thread:
- upload to unstable
Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully
Good day!
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Philippe Vachon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-26 00:02]:
> > > 1. The version of fdisk that comes with Debian Installer REALLY sucks...
> > > namely because I had to figure out on paper my partition table, rather
> >
> > We'll move to something else after s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 283377 security
Bug#283377: Should not copy installer account to /target if
network-console-config not installed
Tags were: pending
Tags added: security
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> severity 283377 grave
Bug#283377: Should not copy installer account to /target if
network-console-config not installed
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: net boot image timestamped as "29-Nov-2004 11:16 "
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-installer/2004-11-29/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 #1 Wed
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> Paul Telford wrote:
> > :00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
> > 21142/43 (rev 30)
> > :00:14.0 0200: 1011:0019 (rev 30)
>
> discover1 wants to load de4x5 for this. Is that wrong?
I don't know. I do know that it didn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 21:50, Deccio, Casey T wrote:
> 'modprobe aic79xx' works just fine from VT2, but when I try go back to
> VT1 and detect hardware again, again it isn't found. I am running the
> installer from a usb drive with the netinst im
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Today, I got the very same probelm I got with the automated Welsh
> > > install. It hangs while probing the APT mirrors.
> > >
> > > The preseed files are exactly the same. Attached is a debug log o
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:06:39 +0900, Horms wrote:
> reassign 275006 debian-installer
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 02:15:31PM +0200, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
>> Same as before, linux26 does not find the SCSI disk, aic7xxx is loaded.
>>
>> Installation logs in http://people.debian.org/~tale/pe
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:05:03 +0100
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The quik.conf should be :
>
> image=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.9-powerpc
> append="root=/dev/ram video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.9-powerpc
> Label=test
this works indeed *much* better :
Hi,
>
> Looks like my sentence wasn't clear. I was more focused on English
> version than translations when replying.
>
> IMHO, you do not need asking for updating translations in the sarge
> branch.
OK.
I will commit the changed files first to trunk and when it is built
there with no errors,
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 24/11/2004 -
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux t3 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux (hmm, must reset the clock!)
Date: 26/11/2004
Method: Download
Paul Telford wrote:
> :00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
> 21142/43 (rev 30)
> :00:14.0 0200: 1011:0019 (rev 30)
discover1 wants to load de4x5 for this. Is that wrong?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:55:20PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> |Fabio Massimo di Nitto wrote:
> |> - - the second one is slightly more dynamic and it involves the
> |> addition ~ of the udebs to the control file at build time, but
> |> they are still arch specific.
Quoting Holger Wansing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > In my opinion, that counts first for changes to the original version
> > of the manual. However, as soon as some English is changed in the
> > manual, there's of course no permission to request for updating
> > translations.
>
> ???
> So from now o
> -Original Message-
> From: Frans Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Deccio, Casey T
> Subject: Re: AIC 79xx for di
>
> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 21:02, Deccio, Casey T wrote:
> > Yeah, I tried the 2.6 kernel also, to
On Di, 2004-11-30 at 14:06 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Where did you see netcfg/use_dhcp=false mentioned? That was changed a while
> ago to netcfg/disable_dhcp=true, and all the docs should have been
> updated already. I think that option will disable the dhcp, whether that
> fixes your kernel hang,
Hi,
I gather there is a problem with installing Linux on machines with SATA
drives. I've tried installing from the woody cd and this ends up assigning my cd
to /dev/hda and my hard drive to /dev/hde which leads to a problem with
untrapped interrupts. My cd drive is on an ATA slot but my har
Your message dated Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:10:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Olivier ROLAND wrote:
> GRUB failed to install during the installation process but LILO does the
> job.
> Many tries and nothing special here simple / and swap give the same result
> (GRUB failed)
>
> If grub is installed after the installation process then grub install is
> OK but then during
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 283427 lilo-installer
Bug#283427: Lilo installation failed
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `lilo-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> merge 283263 283346
Bug#283263: rc2: lilo hangs when using a LVM with a swap partition between two
PVs
Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly
Merged 283263 283346.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 283263 lilo-installer
Bug#283263: rc2: lilo hangs when using a LVM with a swap partition between two
PVs
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `lilo-installer'.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 21:02, Deccio, Casey T wrote:
> Yeah, I tried the 2.6 kernel also, to no avail. However, I haven't
> tried any of the daily builds since rc2. I'll try that also.
Well, AFAICT the required module (aic79xx.ko) _is_ included
> -Original Message-
> From: Frans Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Deccio, Casey T
> Subject: Re: AIC 79xx for di
>
> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 18:57, Deccio, Casey T wrote:
> > scsi0 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HB
Horms wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:55:54PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
Is there any particular reason as to why CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD
is not enabled in a standard Debian kernel? I'm running Sarge
with a home grown 2.4.27 due to _only this_ so from time to time
it's a bit annoying.
Seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 18:57, Deccio, Casey T wrote:
> scsi0 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 1.3.10-RH1
>
> aic7901: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz,
> 512 SCBs
>
> After looking around, it seems t
Quoting Thomas Hood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > in either case you need to remove the OSS
> > module and modprobe the alsa module before alsa will work.
>
>
> Yes.
My very last attempts before leaving work was stopping/restarting
hotplug
My other concern is not needing to run alsaconf as, II
I don't have all answers yet as the box is at work. I'll complete this
tomorrow...
> What are the names of the modules that are loaded?
from memory i180_audio
>
> What variant of libesd do you have installed -- libesd0 or libesd-alsa0?
Well, the thing which comes with the desktop task. I'l
Hi,
> I'd go further and consider getting all patches for the sarge branch
> tested in trunk and/or reviewed by this list before committing them
> there.
> > Sorry:
> > I assume this also counts for translations of the manual?
>
>
> In my opinion, that counts first for changes to the original v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 16:40, Joey Hess wrote:
> Only problem is that we'd need a tftp client in d-i.
According to Colin, busybox has a tftp-client.
It's just not enabled for d-i.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 17:35, Joey Hess wrote:
> - It can take a long time to update d-i to a new kernel version on all
>arches. (Granted, part of this time is spent updating the udebs.)
>So we often find ourselves updated to 2.4.28 on i3
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Today, I got the very same probelm I got with the automated Welsh
> > install. It hangs while probing the APT mirrors.
> >
> > The preseed files are exactly the same. Attached is a debug log of
> > base-config (system booted wit
Jack Carroll wrote:
>Supplement the "DEBOOTSTRAP ERROR" message with something like
> "Go back, and start the Base System install again, or select a faster
> mirror."
>This simple hint could greatly reduce frustration for a Debian newbie.
>
>Similar advice would be desirable if downloa
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Today, I got the very same probelm I got with the automated Welsh
> install. It hangs while probing the APT mirrors.
>
> The preseed files are exactly the same. Attached is a debug log of
> base-config (system booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=.).
>
> This time, no comma is mis
Simon Liebold wrote:
> As soon as DHCP-discovery starts, the machine freezes at 0% of
> DHCP-discovery. You can not switch to another console anymore. I tried
> to boot with "expert" and "netcfg/use_dhcp=false" boot-option, but no
> difference was noticeable.
Where did you see netcfg/use_dhcp=fals
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> I'd like to be able to install both file-preseed and network-preseed
> udebs on the same ramdisk.
>
> I did this and got the following warning while building the ramdisk,
> with the net result that file-preseed vanished from the ramdisk.
I thought there was already a
Your message dated Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:03:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275006: Bug still present in linux26 netinst 20041118 RC2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
reassign 283452 hw-detect
retitle 283452 needs a way in expect mode to prompt user to make sure all
hardware and modules they want are found and loaded
Jack Carroll wrote:
> Still running an install as I'm writing this, but I'll give you a
> quick summary now.
> Turns out that the SCS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 283603 kernel
Bug#283603: nForce2. forcedeth network driver loads with 2.6, but not with 2.4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'.
>
End of message,
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 19:49, Joey Hess wrote in part:
> Probaly this is because on the first boot, the OSS module for your sound
> card is loaded.
Agreed.
> I guess that alsaconf either adds a module to /etc/modules, or loads it,
As part of its detection algorithm, alsaconf attempts to load m
Paul Millar wrote:
> We could use any naming scheme we choose. Perhaps best to avoid any
> collision with PXElinux, as the two are independent; so something
> like /preseed/$hostname maybe?
>
> ... BUT ... the three options above were three different ways of d-i
> discovering which file to use
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 18:33, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Here comes my nightmare : though the sound card in my test box is
> properly detected (modules are loaded), the sound server in Gnome is
> just unable to use it.
What are the names of the modules that are loaded?
What variant of libesd do y
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 15:40, Joey Hess wrote:
> Paul Millar wrote:
[various options]
>
> One thing we could do is append something to the filename, so d-i
> would try to tftp down files from /pxelinux.0.preseed/ using the
> same set of schemes for finding host-specific files as does
> pxelinu
Joey Hess wrote:
> We could pick an option in the 128-254 range and use it, but we might be
> violating rfc2939 by doing so, since it requires that these "MUST NOT be
> defined for use by any publicly distributed DHCP server, client or relay
> agent implementations".
FWIW, FAI uses some of those o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 261705 discover-data: mv64340_eth driver has been renamed
> 'mv643xx_eth' in 2.6.9
Bug#261705: discover-data: mv64340_eth is named 'mv643xx_eth'
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 283679 discover1-data: mv64340_eth driver has been renamed
> 'mv643x
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 283452 hw-detect
Bug#283452: No SCSI module support in Debian Installer RC2
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'.
> retitle 283452 needs a way in expect mode to prompt user to make sure all
> hardware and modules
Horms wrote:
> There was a fix to the aic7xxx driver included in kernel-source-2.6.8
> 2.6.8-10 (actually it was in 2.6.8-9) but that was broken.
>
> I think it is up to the di team to rebuild the kernel against that
> package, I am reassigning it accordingly.
We did, after rc2. If you want to tr
Christian Perrier wrote:
> At the end of the install, a user session is automagically opened and
> I intend to get a nice sound saying "Hello and welcome to your new
> Debian system"...in the current language. The session is a GNome
> session because this is what give all defaults settings.
>
> He
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 18:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> But make sure you don't fix it for kernel <2.6.8, or things will break again,
> and as sarge will ship with 2.6.8 ...
Yes, in /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8/drivers/net/Makefile:
obj-$(CONFIG_MV64340_ETH) += mv64340_eth.o
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hello dear ALSA package developers (and fellow d-i developers),
As first introdcution, let me mention that I'm quite dumb when
everything comes at sound in Linux, so please forgive in advance my
mistakes or imprecisions...:-)
I'm currently trying to setup a demo box for Debian Installer. The
gene
Hi,
The new debian installer is great! However, when I start the installer,
it doesn't recognize my SCSI hard drive. The information for the drive
is below:
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 1.3.10-RH1
aic7901: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mh
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've done a bit more testing. The problem only occurs if I boot using
>> 'linux26', if I boot using 'linux' the network detection and
>> configuration work fine. Looking in the syslog for 2.4 I see
>
> Well, maybe the driver to be loaded is differ
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Where you are asking others to do some coding,
> what about to test the boot.img.gz
> from
> http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/
> on a LS120 disk?
It won't work, since it's missing ide-floppy. This ls120 drive is the
fi
Package: preseed
Version: 1.01
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to be able to install both file-preseed and network-preseed
udebs on the same ramdisk.
I did this and got the following warning while building the ramdisk,
with the net result that file-preseed vanished from the ramdisk.
| Selecting
Tried again this morning with linux26.
Result: Hangs in "Setting up Kernel-image".
Keyboard locked. Used the red button. There are no
logs in the /var/log dir: looked after booting from a
rescue disk.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Y
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
> For a 2.6.8 kernel the ide-floppy.ko module takes about 19507 bytes of
> disk space? Do we have that much left on the normal floppy images?
We don't have ide-core on the boot floppy image, nor do we have space for
it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/2004-11-29/powerpc/netboot/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
& rc2-Version
uname -a: No oportunity to do a "uname -a"
Date: Nov 30 17:23:26 CET 2004
Method: bootp(dhcp)-netboot, tftp successfully serves image (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 261705 discover-data: mv64340_eth is named 'mv643xx_eth'
Bug#261705: discover-data: Please add Marvell MV64360/1/2 builtin gigabit
ethernet driver support.
Changed Bug title.
> tags 261705 - patch
Bug#261705: discover-data: mv64340_eth is name
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Taking all archs together, the number of kernel udebs across all
> architectures and flavours seems to be 464. If there is a limit on how many
> binary packages per source the archive can handle, that probably does blow
> out the limit. I thought the limit was only on the
Steve Langasek wrote:
> class "vendor-classes" {
>match option vendor-class-identifier;
> }
>
> subclass "vendor-classes" "D-I" {
>next-server 192.168.1.3;
>filename "preseed-gunk";
> }
Good idea.. I wonder if the next-server and filename here should be used
to construct a http ur
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: CD-ROM image built with jigdo on 20041114
uname -a: N/A
Date: 20041130
Method: CD-ROM
Machine: SUN Blade 100
Processor:
Memory: 640 Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: N/A
Output of lspci and lspci -n: N/A
Base System Installation
Paul Millar wrote:
> As you say, the PXE boot will have already used the
> next-server:/filename DHCP extensions to download the next-stage
> installer (PXElinux / d-i / whatever). Overloading the filename
> parameter seems like a recipe for disaster; sure, we can return a
> vendor-ID-based va
From: Christian Perrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Such a question would be pertinent enough is asked very eary...and
> thus would be in English only. As we always tried to minimize the
> amount of English seen by users (except those who choose
> English...obviously) as well as the number of sc
Sounds like a good idea.
As you say, the PXE boot will have already used the
next-server:/filename DHCP extensions to download the next-stage
installer (PXElinux / d-i / whatever). Overloading the filename
parameter seems like a recipe for disaster; sure, we can return a
vendor-ID-based value
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:36:30AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > other way. This still doesn't mean that it is d-i task to workaround this
> > > kind of problems introducing extra sets of udebs
>
> > Well, how do you install on th
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:31:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:40:24AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > You don't generate udebs for each flavour because there
> > > is not necessarely the need for it. In the i386 example there is only
> > > one set of udebs coming from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
|> |> 20 sets of udebs, but just the common ones that can manage to
|> |> boot everything since the installer will make the proper
|> decision |> later. | | | No. This works for the -up against -smp
|> ones, and maybe for the | upcomi
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 12:44:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> |> |> 20 sets of udebs, but just the common ones that can manage to
> |> |> boot everything since the installer will make the proper
> |> decision |
Decided to play around with this a little more, as proof of concept, since
the manpage examples didn't *exactly* match the desired usage here.
Here is a slice of dhcpd.conf that does the right thing (with dhcp3):
group {
next-server 192.168.1.3;
host tftpclient {
# tftp client hardwar
OK,
I made another test.
Plain PC, one hard disk.
Initiated with the debian boot floppies, used
ftp.de.debian.org as the mirror.
With the partition tool, I made two partitions:
- 1 GBhda1
- 10 GB hda2
Both configured as RAID partitions.
I then installed RAID1 devices,
one for swap,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:55:06AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> |
> | On these, there is a separate kernel because it is needed, not
> | because you want some random optimizations. Try to install on a
> | m68k/pm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
|
| On these, there is a separate kernel because it is needed, not
| because you want some random optimizations. Try to install on a
| m68k/pmac with a m68k/amiga kernel to take one example i am
| familiar with, and you will see whta
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Perrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thiemo Seufer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: Bug#283456: installation-reports
>
> > > > Comments/Problems:
> > > > Was it really that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 141181 !
Bug#141181: O: nase-a60 -- An Algol-60 interpreter
Changed Bug submitter from "Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 29277 !
Bug#29277: Constructing sentences in dinst
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > other way. This still doesn't mean that it is d-i task to workaround this
> > kind of problems introducing extra sets of udebs
> Well, how do you install on that box then, provided we can't fix the above
> bug, if it is a bug ?
> M
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:40:24AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You don't generate udebs for each flavour because there
> > is not necessarely the need for it. In the i386 example there is only
> > one set of udebs coming from the -386- flavour.
> Well, maybe, i am no expert on x86, but on powerp
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:55:23AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> |
> |
> |> |> | multiplied by the number of architectures plus the number of
> |> | |> architectures having 2.6 kernels. |> |> ??? this makes no
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
|
|
|> |> | multiplied by the number of architectures plus the number of
|> | |> architectures having 2.6 kernels. |> |> ??? this makes no
|> sence to me at all. and we are only talking |> about one kernel.
|> |> |> You only multiply
On 30. Nov 2004, at 09:43 Uhr, Markus Hanauska wrote:
However, I solved the problem! I was caused by an incorrect DNS
server. After DHCP failed, I entered the following address
information:
Address x.x.x.113
Subnet-Mask 255.255.255.192
Gatetway x.x.x.126
DNS x.x.x.126
However, that was incorrect
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:12:04AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Next I looked at the dhcp rfcs. The dhcp options seemed like the obvious
> way to get an url passed from dhcp to d-i. I looked at using option 43,
> the vendor defined option, since its use is quite close to how d-i would
> work. However,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:14:27AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> | On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
> | wrote:
> |
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Hi Sv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
| wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hi Sven,
|>
|> Sven Luther wrote:
|>
|> | | Imagine all the .udebs for all the modules plus the kerne
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:55:20PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I am not really sure what you are talking about, but we have packages
> > in the archive generating way more binaries that what this solution does.
>
> No, w
On 29. Nov 2004, at 19:48 Uhr, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 29 November 2004 16:30, Markus Hanauska wrote:
After 1% of the base installation var log messages say:
eval: 3: Syntax error: newline unexpected (expecting ")")
I've seen this reported before, but it was not traced and must only
occur
in a
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
