On 2004-09-07 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > I know there were some changes for Dutch including some fairly
> > important ones for exim4.
> For exim4 updates, it all depends on the maintainer (Andreas Metzler,
> IIRC).
[...]
| exim4 (4.34-4sarge1) testing-proposed-update
[Kenshi Muto]
> But perl, libapt-pkg-perl and libconfig-inifiles-perl aren't ready on
> 2nd stage. (IMHO apt-install them is bad idea because perl-base is
> already installed.)
What do you mean here? Are these packages missing on the CD? Why is
the fact that perl-base is already installed making
Hi,
At 31 Aug 04 16:52:18 GMT,
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
> production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
> Debian.
> It has been uploaded today to the Debian archive so that anyone can
> test.
That's
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040905
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso, dated 20040905
uname -a: n/a
Date: 20040906
Method: netinst image
Machine: Compaq Proliant 800
Processor: 2x Intel PentiumII @ 350Mhz
Memory: 1Gb
Root Device: SCSI
Root Size
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:58:25AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Without news in the next days, however, I will propose a NMU...but I'm
> not really sure of the proper way to handle a NMU update in
> testing-proposed-updates..:-)
All the usual rules for both t-p-u and NMUs apply. That include
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > The dialog asking the user whether his system clock is set to local time or
> > GMT currently displays e.g:
> > The hardware clock says the time is now Sat 04 Sep 2004 11:16:20 AM UTC
>
> I can't reproduce this. The command run to get
> Unfortunatly I can't think of a good way to remove the time zone from
> the display that'll work for all LC_TIME settings.
Agreed. My former mail just said the same Rick, Frans and you said, btw.
About the tzsetup screen, making it clearer seems to be the only
solution...which may be tricky an
(from a mail originally in -boot asking about the status of
translation updates in packages we consider part of "second level" of
translations for Debian Installer, which mean they always input users
during a base system install)
> Do you have any idea what the status is of updates submitted by th
Quoting Dennis Stampfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hey translators and translation interested people,
>
> after some delay, I managed to update the status page(s) for
> debian-installer translation work. The scripts are now level-based, no
> stages anymore.
For those who didn't follow the whole sto
On Monday, September 6, 2004, at 11:00 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Apparently, it looks at the "LANG" environment variable...
LANG=C /sbin/hwclock --show --localtime
gives
Tue Sep 7 02:22:16 2004 -0.463550 seconds
but
LANG=en_US /sbin/hwclock --show --localtime
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-alpha-netinst.iso 20040902
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:39:17 +1000
Method: cdrom
Machine: digital DEC 3000 - M300LX
Processor: KN16-DA -V6.9-S87E-I21A-sV2.1L-DECchip 21064 P3.0
Memory: 64 Mbytes
Root Device: DKA300
Base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:18, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 12:56:06AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> BTW the installer/doc/manual/translations.txt explains how to start a
> new translation, but it tells to use cp instead if svn cp, I
Hi Frans,
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 12:56:06AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have tested that your translation builds OK (and it does, after fixing one
> small mistake in ca/welcome/about-copyright.xml).
Thanks!
> A mail with the results of a build will be send to the debian-l10n-catalan
> list. A
Rick Thomas wrote:
> Apparently, it looks at the "LANG" environment variable...
>
> LANG=C /sbin/hwclock --show --localtime
> gives
> Tue Sep 7 02:22:16 2004 -0.463550 seconds
> but
> LANG=en_US /sbin/hwclock --show --localtime
> gives
> Tue 07 Sep 2004 02:23:24 AM EDT -
Frans Pop wrote:
>
> On Monday 06 September 2004 19:53, Joey Hess wrote:
> > AfAIK hwclock output never includes the timezone.
>
> I'm afraid it does.
>
> On a system installed with LANG=en_US (on which I based my report):
> # hwclock --show --localtime | awk '{NF-=2; print $0}'
> Mon 06 Sep 2
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 21:21:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of cdrom-detect 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 21:21:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of bugreporter-udeb 1.00
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.04.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.04.tar.gz
di-utils-bootfloppy_1.04_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils
tag 265612 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:40:02 -0400
Source: cdrom-detect
Binary: cdrom-detect
Architecture: source all
tag 248037 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:47:55 -0400
Source: bugreporter-udeb
Binary: bugreporter-udeb
Architecture: so
Accepted:
base-installer_1.05.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.05.dsc
base-installer_1.05.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.05.tar.gz
base-installer_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.05_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Accepted:
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
Announcing to
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to se
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19.dsc
partman-reiserfs_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_19_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269935: fixed in partman-reiserfs 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269804: fixed in base-installer 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269935: fixed in partman-reiserfs 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 265612 + fixed
Bug#265612: confusing message
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 248037 + fixed
Bug#248037: package-versions is extremly slow
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
partman-reiserfs_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_19.dsc
partman-reiserfs_19.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_19_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
cdrom-detect_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
debian-installer-utils_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.04.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.04.tar.gz
di-utils-reboot_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.04_all.udeb
base-installer_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.05.dsc
base-installer_1.05.tar.gz
base-installer_1.05_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Joey Hess wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
It stands.
And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To.
Settle down Joey. AFAIK my MUA doesn't offer the facility. It does allow
me to make a choice that reduces the a
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
Accepted:
lowmem_1.03.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03.dsc
lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
Accepted:
anna_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02.dsc
anna_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02.tar.gz
anna_1.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02_i386.udeb
load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank
Accepted:
iso-scan_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01.dsc
iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
Announcing to
Accepted:
file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
preseed_0.03.dsc
to pool/main/p/preseed/preseed_0.03.dsc
preseed_0.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/preseed/preseed_0.03.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iso-scan_1.01.dsc
iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
anna_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
anna_1.02.dsc
anna_1.02.tar.gz
load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
anna_1.02_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
lowmem_1.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_1.03.dsc
lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
preseed_0.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_0.03.dsc
preseed_0.03.tar.gz
network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
John Summerfield wrote:
> A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
> It stands.
And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate
for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and
I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.)
A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
It stands.
Joh
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
discover1_1.6.6.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.6.dsc
discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
discover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discove
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269960: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269206: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261825: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
discover1_1.6.6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.6.6.dsc
discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
discover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.6.6_i386.deb
discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
Greetin
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.92.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.92.dsc
rootskel_0.92.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
rootskel_0.92_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.92.dsc
rootskel_0.92.tar.gz
rootskel_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Jan Harnisch wrote:
> Originally, I intended to boot this Laptop from floppy and access the
> install DVD inside my desktop PC via NFS (the Laptop does not have any
> drives installed; only a floppy drive in the UltraBase). Unfortunately,
> I had to see that there is apparently no way to access
Accepted:
archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
ddetect_1.05.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.05.dsc
ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_1.05_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and th
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:47:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262638: fixed in ddetect 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:47:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267402: fixed in ddetect 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ddetect_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_1.05.dsc
ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_1.05_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.05_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCR
Frans Pop wrote:
> How do you want test results reported? I don't think normal installation
> reports in this case (hard to organize).
> Maybe just specific bugreports against partman? I think that would make it
> easier to check if a problem has already been reported as well.
Yes obviously just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dennis,
On Thursday 19 August 2004 18:26, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> as you might know, some packages related to the debian-installer are in
> section base and are frozen due to the process of releasing sarge in the
> next weeks. Thus, no changes
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:20:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 06 September 2004 22:55, Joey Hess wrote:
> So this is a call for anyone who can to test partman in the daily
> builds. We need to not only do automated partitioning tests, but manual
> partitioning and try all the little nooks and corners an
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1 (20040801 from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/rc1/images/floppy/)
uname -a: Linux sheratan 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004
i686 unknown
Date: 6. Sept. 2004
Method: floppy
Machine: IBM Thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 269809 debian-installer
Bug#269809: ICH4 IDE hard disk not being detected
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `debian-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
The recent changes to partman after rc1 have introduced a lot of bugs
that have been found over the past week. This has included the various
problems with it not finding drives that everyone saw, and also problems
with reiserfs and xfs support being broken. I'm worried that there are
more new bugs
Accepted:
zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PRO
Accepted:
partman-xfs_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19.dsc
partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to De
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:30:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Hey translators and translation interested people,
after some delay, I managed to update the status page(s) for
debian-installer translation work. The scripts are now level-based, no
stages anymore.
Using them is quite the same as before:
Instead of:
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/1st-
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> >Apparently it only lets you change the label is the partition is marked
> >to be formatted. Probably because the tools in the installer are only able
> >to do so at format time. If you choose to keep the data on the parition,
> >it won't let you change
partman-xfs_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_19.dsc
partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 270304 netcfg
Bug#270304: Instructions for entering wlan key should be clearer
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `netcfg'.
> retitle 270304 wep key entry unclear
Bug#27
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_33_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:47:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270138: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Joey Hess wrote:
Apparently it only lets you change the label is the partition is marked
to be formatted. Probably because the tools in the installer are only able
to do so at format time. If you choose to keep the data on the parition,
it won't let you change the label.
mkreiserfs is pretty fast,
partman-basicfilesystems_33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Using the new partman and partman-reiserfs udebs I could set a
> mount point even for reiserfs. But there were 2 problems:
>
> - I still got an error popup saying that the root filesystem
> is not specified.
Recent changes to partman-reiserfs's fstab.d broke it. The scrip
On Monday 06 September 2004 19:53, Joey Hess wrote:
> AfAIK hwclock output never includes the timezone.
I'm afraid it does.
On a system installed with LANG=en_US (on which I based my report):
# hwclock --show --localtime | awk '{NF-=2; print $0}'
Mon 06 Sep 2004 09:00:31 PM CEST
On a system inst
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Using the new partman and partman-reiserfs udebs I could set a
> mount point even for reiserfs. But there were 2 problems:
>
> - I still got an error popup saying that the root filesystem
> is not specified.
Me too.
> - The partman menu for reiserfs asked for a label, so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 270304 netcfg
Bug#270304: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
> retitle 270304 Instructions for entering wlan key should be clearer
Bug#270304: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug
Accepted:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Than
nobootloader_0.0.22_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1 businesscard and netinst images
uname -a: Linux boxname 2.6.7-1-i386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 9/6/04 AM sometime
Method: Booted from both Netinst and businesscard images. Attempted network install
from us.debian.
Frans Pop wrote:
> The dialog asking the user whether his system clock is set to local time or
> GMT currently displays e.g:
> The hardware clock says the time is now Sat 04 Sep 2004 11:16:20 AM UTC
I can't reproduce this. The command run to get the time is this:
hwclock --show --localtime | awk
([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate
for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and
I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.)
John Summerfield wrote:
> I've just submitted two kernel bug reports that have the potential to be
> releas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 269630 partman-reiserfs
Bug#269630: Installation Report amd64(gcc-3.2)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-reiserfs'.
> severity 269630 serious
Bug
Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Andreas Tille wrote:
> >># fdisk /dev/hda
> >> Unable to open /dev/hda
> >># cfdisk /dev/hda
> >> FATAL ERROR: Cannot open disk drive
> >
> >The debian installer uses devfs.
> Well that means exactly what if it does not detect the harddisk? It only
> means
> that my ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 269734 discover1-data
Bug#269734: debian-installer: 3w-9xxx module not autodetected
Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `discover1-data'.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Hang on, Frans (and others !), I now understand why having a default country for each
language is really not easyand also why it works with French and
not with Dutch (after making a small change to languagechooser for
putting a default country for all languages)
All this is because the way
Rejected: Unknown distribution `UNRELEASED'.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nobootloader_0.0.22_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 02:26:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
It seems that active_partitions/reiserfs/choices still uses
partman-reiserfs/text/options, which was removed earlier. So the script
bombs out before it can give a mount point choice.
I commited the fix.
Using the new
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: netinst rc1 ISO, downloaded from debian.org
on Sept. 3, 2004
uname -a: n/a
Date: Sept. 3, 2004
Method: Booted from CD-ROM with netinst rc1 ISO. Didn't get far
enough to use network install.
Machine: Dell Inspiron 2650c
Processor: Intel Cele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: discover1
Version:1.6.5
I have two machines with SID (one laptop and one desktop) and
discover1 doesn't setup the cdroms anymore?
There's only a symlink in the /media directory but the symlink points
to nothing? (/media/cdrom <- is
the sy
I downloaded iso-images of the srage release and tried
to install them on my PII 333Mhz, 128Mb, 2x15Gb SCSI
Harddisks (Win 2000 is installed on Disk 1), IDE-CD
Rom.
I have some experience with suse 8.2 on disk 2 and
everything (including Grub) work fine.
So I wanted to give Sarge a try and instal
tags 270225 pending
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: partman
> Version: 54
> Severity: minor
>
> 'No partitionable media was found.'
> should be
> 'No partitionable media were found.'
Change made (translation unfuzzied)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 270225 pending
Bug#270225: Minor error in 'No partitionable media' dialog
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: partman
> Version: 54
> Severity: minor
>
> 'No partitionable media was found.'
> should be
> 'No partitionable media were found.'
After a long debate on IRC:
Kamion bubulle: "no medium" is definitively singular.
Kamion bubulle: "no me
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
