>
> The thing seems to be mounting kernel error disapeared now as I
> remember. That may be the source of problem. I think it should error
> and reset kernel IDE driver to use non-DMA mode.
>
> (So no need for my patch in a sense. This relied on kernel error and
> remount.)
>
> By the way, for b
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 01:44:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > But my RC1 install fails on some machine (one which had hard time
> > mounting CD initially) with;
> >
> > anna[4147]: /cdrom/dists//Release
> > anna[4147]: : N
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 02:02:52PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I can not get exact log out due to missing libutil.so.1 :)
> > But my RC1 install fails on some machine (one which had hard time
> > mounting CD initially) with;
> >
> > anna[4147]: /cdrom/dists//Release
> > anna[4147]
Paul Telford wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2004, at 8:37 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> >I can't think of a good way to do this automatically using the standard
> >d-i images. If you take a look at what debian-edu does with
> >debian-edu-install-udeb, you'll see one elegant way to do it that
> >requires building
On Aug 13, 2004, at 8:37 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
I can't think of a good way to do this automatically using the standard
d-i images. If you take a look at what debian-edu does with
debian-edu-install-udeb, you'll see one elegant way to do it that
requires building your own d-i images.
I did take a loo
> I can not get exact log out due to missing libutil.so.1 :)
> But my RC1 install fails on some machine (one which had hard time
> mounting CD initially) with;
>
> anna[4147]: /cdrom/dists//Release
> anna[4147]: : No such file or directory
>
> I have cdrom mounted and /cdrom/dists/*/RElea
reassign 265597 aboot-installer
thanks
Hi Nathan,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:13:33PM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote:
> Machine: AlphaServer 2100 4x275
> Processor: 2 x Alpha EV45 275mhz
> Memory: 512MB
> Root Device: HW RAID5 on DAC960 controller, /dev/rd/c0d0
> Root Size/partition table: (a=aboot,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 265597 aboot-installer
Bug#265597: Alpha+DAC960: aboot installation failed
Bug reassigned from package `aboot-installer' to `aboot-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
The debian-desktop wiki page [1] evolved into a good resource for things
debian reviewers will most certainly pull on during the sarge review wave.
The DebianDesktopHowTo [2] tries to show how to get over some issues.
Would be better if it could work without a how-to though.
Kind Regards,
Chris
Paul Telford wrote:
> I'm would like to build a version of d-i which automatically partitions my
> disk without prompting. It is my understanding that autopartkit can do
> this. Problem is, I can't figure out how I make autopartkit become the
> default partitioning module instead of partman in my
I'm would like to build a version of d-i which automatically partitions my
disk without prompting. It is my understanding that autopartkit can do
this. Problem is, I can't figure out how I make autopartkit become the
default partitioning module instead of partman in my d-i boot image. Can
anyon
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:16:55 +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I can not get exact log out due to missing libutil.so.1 :)
FYI, I just install putty-utils and scp a binary to my web server, and
wget it when things like this happen.
For example:
http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pscp
--
Joshua Kwan
--
T
Hello-
I am trying to install Debian Woody on a Dell Latitude LM. I want to do
a network install as I have no bootable CD drive. I have a Cirrus Logic
CL-PD6730 PCMCIA controller, with a 3com 3CCFE574BT 10/100 ethernet
card. I use the i82365 controller, but when I try to configure the
PCMCIA,
Simon Schoar wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version: RC1
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
> and daily 2004-08-14
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 12:05:05AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I just recalled that I wrote those checks already. Did you not see
> them and what exactly did you try to do?
>
I'm not sure, I didn't bump into anything. I knew enought o make the
partition, so if I'm supposed to accidently trig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8
> tags 265612 moreinfo
Bug#265612: missing modules for pcnet32 and rtl8139 NIC
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 07:16:55PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> But my RC1 install fails on some machine (one which had hard time
> mounting CD initially) with;
>
> anna[4147]: /cdrom/dists//Release
> anna[4147]: : No such file or directory
>
> I have cdrom mounted and /cdrom/dists/*/REle
> Feel free to file a wishlist bug report against ntfsresize for making an
> udeb.
>
> Anton Zinoviev
OK, I've opened a new bug against linux-ntfs: 265617
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265617
Thanks everyone for the info as I learn "the Debian way" (of development) :)
Dustin
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
and daily 2004-08-14
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2004-08-14
Method: boot from cd
I can not get exact log out due to missing libutil.so.1 :)
But my RC1 install fails on some machine (one which had hard time
mounting CD initially) with;
anna[4147]: /cdrom/dists//Release
anna[4147]: : No such file or directory
I have cdrom mounted and /cdrom/dists/*/RElease exist all
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-12 10:39]:
> > Since the firmware can't mount >ext2r0, it would be better if this
> > was enforced more strictly, you almost certainly need a /boot
> > partition.
>
> I'll put in some checks.
I just recalled that I wrote those checks already. Did you not see
th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8
> reassign 265597 aboot-installer
Bug#265597: Alpha+DAC960: aboot installation failed
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `aboot-installer'.
> tags 265597 d-i
Bug#265597
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-30 12:33]:
> > > This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which
> > > is already fixed, not the "complete shutdown cdebconf" case.
> > Okay, but it seems the fix doesn't work. (With sid images from a few
> > days ago.)
> Are there a
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge netinst daily of 20040812
uname -a: Linux buddha 2.4.26-1-generic #1 Tue Aug 3 22:46:34 CEST 2004 alpha GNU/Linux
Date: Fri Aug 13 15:59:17 CDT 2004
Method: Booted from SRM onto the netinst CD.
Machine: AlphaServer 2100 4x275
Processor
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1 i386 netinst CD image with Debian base
uname -a: Failure to install
Date: 2004-08-12
Method: Boot from CD, behind NAT'd firewall
Machine: Dell Poweredge 750 1U P4 Server
Processor: P4 2.8Ghz HT 800mhz FSB
Memory: 1.5GB
Root Device: SATA
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2004-08-13 18:18:27+0200]
> [Recai Oktas]
> > There are some minor problems with Swedish entry which doesn't cause
> > harmful results at the moment, but may introduce unexpected bugs in
> > future as far as the current format of languagelist and SUPPORTED list
> > concern
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Michael Kahle wrote:
> The subject says it all. I am getting the same error on this machine
> after using RC1. Grub will not install on my SCSI RAID Array with a
> Adaptec 2120s Raid Controller??!??!??! What gives?
>
> The same error every time, "The file /boot/grub/stage1 n
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: release candidate 1, from cdimage.debian.org
uname -a:
Linux elea 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: August 12, 2004, about 10pm Pacific
Method: Network install using netinst CD with debian base. Network
connectio
Package: partman
Version: 48
Previous version of partman would default to ext3 if I selected to format an
existing partition.
When I select an existing partition in the current partman, it is correctly
recognized as currently formatted as ext3. However, after I select Use as,
the default is ex
Package: partman
Version: 48
IMHO the old 'format partition' versus 'keep existing data' choice was clearer
than the current option 'Create file system'.
With the current user interface it is too easy for the user to "forget" to
format the root partition when using an existing partition.
Maybe
[Recai Oktas]
> There are some minor problems with Swedish entry which doesn't cause
> harmful results at the moment, but may introduce unexpected bugs in
> future as far as the current format of languagelist and SUPPORTED list
> concerned:
>
> * Fallback locale code (3rd entry 'sv_SE.ISO.8859-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8
> clone 265520 -1
Bug#265520: [i386][rc1][floppy,netinst] aic7xxx crash, partition table CHS damage
Bug 265520 cloned as bug 265556.
> tags -1 d-i
Bug#265556: [i386][rc1][floppy,netinst]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Hi!
>
>I don't know much about sparcs and I don't know how to deal with this
>bug.
>
>Please preserve CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Anton Zinoviev
>On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:29:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [?] Detect and mount cdrom
>> Error while r
Package: languagechooser
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n patch
There are some minor problems with Swedish entry which doesn't cause
harmful results at the moment, but may introduce unexpected bugs in
future as far as the current format of languagelist and SUPPORTED list
concerned:
* Fallback locale
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: RC1 (20040801) from
http://wftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/debian/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/rc1/images/floppy/{b,r}oot.img
uname -a: Linux guitar 2.4.26-1-586tsc #1 Thu Jul 22 12:53:42 JST 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -Unloading manualy ( rmmod i810-tco ) on every reboot makes the problem
> go away. The work around in errata statet to add "810-tco" in
> /etc/hotplug/blacklist, this is already the case on that PC
Look again, your blacklist has 810_tcu, with an underscore. The hotplug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 20:44, Joey Hess wrote:
> Here are some of the issues I'm tracking for rc2.
>
I think the 'missing libutil and libcrypt files for i386' issue should be
added to this list. See #264370.
Without these files network-console an
Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Users sometimes report they are confused by partman because they cannot
tell that the partition table is part of the select list, and selectable
to edit it. A simple fix for this would be to make the contents of the
select list be clearly set off from t
The same goes for Dutch, where the current default is also België (Belgium).
IMHO the default should be Nederland (Netherlands).
AFAICT the default is determined by the countrycode field in /usr/share/
languagelist which is part of the languagechooser package.
A patch was proposed by bubulle in #
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:18:55PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:18, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:55:28AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> > > In the mean time, would it work with BootX?
> >
> > No, don't think so, but the plain vmlinux/initrd.gz work with
s. keeling wrote:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/current/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
>
> (0) keeling /scratch/iso_ md5sum sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
> 310225dba49c853572344df49de45b2c sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
>
> (0) keeling /scratch/iso_ cat MD5SUMS
> 21f695c71a190e3
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:31:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Installation report - Fujitsu C Series Lifebook
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I guess it's not possible for you to do an installation via a real
> terminal (ie not serial console) so you could check what's going on
> via a shell on the 2nd virtual console?
Unfortunately the machine only has a serial console. I'd love to be
able to provide more i
I guess it's not possible for you to do an installation via a real
terminal (ie not serial console) so you could check what's going on
via a shell on the 2nd virtual console?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think I can make the meeting as well.
It's an easy drive for me so I won't need travel expenses covered.
I could pick up one passenger along the route Medemblik - Afsluitdijk -
Groningen (all in Holland) - Oldenburg.
Are any more details available
Package: installation-reports
uname -a: Linux fozzie 2.4.26-1-generic #1 Thu Jun 10 23:43:13 CDT 2004
alpha GNU/Linux
Date: Fri Aug 13 22:13:58 EST 2004
Method: Installed from netinst CD
Machine: Alpha PC164SX
Processor: PCA56
Memory: 256M
Root Device: ide drive /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table:
Hi,
-The crash was due to hotplug i810-tco module. The errata was read prior
to installing but since the PC isn't use for with hot plugable device
and also there was display (errata says "No Display") so the taught was
that the problem wasn't in the errata.
-Unloading manualy ( rmmod i810-tco )
Package: discover1-data
Severity: normal
Hi,
today I did a install of RC1 on a DELL 1750
I got a error message about aacraid.
pci id 10280008 was affected to aacraid module but in fact, it's the
R.A.C for Dell.
Here is a patch.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefe
Further information:
The same problem ocurred when using the the Aug 12 daily build from
here: http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/
Also, when I say lcoked up, I mean the system becomes completely
unresponsive and the LED heartbeat indicator stops flashing.
Please contact me if you
I'm told and documentation indicates that the kernel boot string can be
used to provide answers to debian-installer so it doesn't ask certain
questions.
This can be very important with network or unattended boot images, so
that the machine can be automatically brought to an online state to
al
of disturbing its equilibrium Then impelled by its powerful screw you did at Naples I can clearly see that you will some day become our wholesale from Sun Tzu None of these has the slightest claim to
of the house and inspecting every corner that might afford a retreat instinctive sense of
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:58:38 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Selection of mount point is improved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:51:46 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246998: Beta 4: Partition percentage problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:40:22 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Partman-auto has recipes customized for hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> What problems did she had with it exactly and how do you think it could
> be proved? (FWIW, there have been discussions about improving the UI of
> the partitioning tool before, so any input is appreciated).
I'm sure there have been .. The partitioni
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:37:31 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249041: Please support disk labels (LABEL=)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Release Candidate 1
uname -a: N/A
Date: Fri Aug 13 10:09:14 CEST 2004
Method: Booted from CD
Machine: Sun SparcStation 2
Processor: ?
Memory: 32 MB
Root Device: SCSI, /dev/sda
Root Size/partition table: N/A
Output of lspci: N/A
Base System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 263224 serious
Bug#263224: no pppoe module at boot time
Severity set to `serious'.
> reassign 262941 modutils
Bug#262941: no working pppoeconf and pppoe
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `modutils'.
> severity 262941 serio
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:05:15PM -0700, Dustin Harriman wrote:
>
> So "ntfstools" (the command
> line programs) and "libntfs5" (the library) seem much more
> realistic/quicker routes to get NTFS resizing into d-i.
Ok.
> I also see that d-i includes many .deb files that are not in .udeb format.
I'm just kind of thinking out loud here, in case anyone else is
entertaining the idea of using "ntfsresize" for shrinking NTFS partitions
in d-i.
IMHO, growing NTFS partitions is not very important, it's the shrinking of
them. That's the scenrio all the Windows refugees are in, they want more
fre
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Thorsten Schaefer wrote:
>
> If I enter the size 2 GB in MB, so 2048 MB it creates a partition of 2
> GB, so I think there exists a bug at this point and I would
> assume a reopening of this bug report makes sense.
What happens if you enter 2 GB as 2000 M
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:59:01PM -0700, Dustin Harriman wrote:
>
> Then apparently cfdisk can delete and recreate the partition around the
> smaller NTFS data, but I don't know the args.
Me too.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
The thing that happens as a by-product of pppoeconf that enables the
pppoe to work later on is the loading of the pppoe module. So to have
pppoe working after reboot, `modprobe pppoe' is needed before `pon
dsl-provider'. I think pppoeconf should have done something differently
with the files it gen
severity 263224 serious
reassign 262941 modutils
severity 262941 serious
merge 262941 263224
thanks
#include
* Vassilii Khachaturov [Fri, Aug 13 2004, 08:50:58AM]:
> The thing that happens as a by-product of pppoeconf that enables the
> pppoe to work later on is the loading of the pppoe module. S
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:05:15PM -0700, Dustin Harriman wrote:
> >
> > No. However I think there are some efforts to add to parted support to
> > resize ntfs by external library (as this is done with reiserfs).
>
> It seems quite unlikely that ntfs resizing will get into GNU parted
> anytime so
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1
uname -a:
Date: 2004-08-12
Method: network installation (dhcp3 / tftpd) via serial
Machine: HP 9000 Model A180
Processor: PA-RISC
Memory: 224M
Root Device: SCSI
Root Size/partition table:
I tried both single partition and seperate /h
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux monroe 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2004-Aug-08 00:06 GMT
Method: Installed from CD containing sarge-i386-netinst.iso (release candidate 1)
Machine: ASUS A7N8X D
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: grabbed from SVN, revision 19009, AFAIK
uname -a: 2.6.7-5-amd64-k8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.1 (Debian
3.4.1-4.0.0.1.amd64)) #1 Sat Jul 31 14:03:13 CEST 2004
Date: 20040813
Method: build monolithic image for 2.6, boot using
68 matches
Mail list logo
