Beta 4 of the installer appears to fix this bug. I get much farther now.
Installation report to follow in a separate thread
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3.V.2004 at 02:32 (+0100) Colin Watson wrote:
>
> What were you proposing to do with property="$method", if not pass
> it to a valid_filesystems script? If it's supposed to be passed to
> valid_filesystems, I'd like to reinstate
> partman-newworld/valid_filesystems,
Yes, you are right. The s
Hi,
Is there any documentation for partman, either user or developper ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bentley,{
75%off for all New Softwares.
WindowXP,Photoshop,Window2003...etcMore
http://www.hjkjlj.info/OE017/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=601
homotopy,seated man that.
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 22:32]:
> This is caused by #223388. The function get_pvs of lvmcfg.sh invokes
> /usr/lib/partconf/find-partitions, however find-partition doesn't list
> all LVM partitions as being LVM but only those that do not contain any
> file system.
>
> Henc
I realize that I am a very despicable being who
cannot even dream of kissing your shoes, guys, but, at
the very least you could tell me where else I can ask
questions that pertain to using DEBIAN LOADER; at the
very least.
Long live open source!
Hearthstone.
--- "Mr. Jan Hearthstone" <[EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 246909 241785
Bug#241785: installation-reports
Bug#246909: debian-installer: Manual partitioning modifies wrong device
Merged 241785 246909.
> severity 246909 important
Bug#246909: debian-installer: Manual partitioning modifies wrong device
Bug#2
linux-kernel-di-i386_0.60_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing linux-kernel-di-i386_0.60_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for
now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:55:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> The best idea I have is to ask the glibc folks for a libnss-files-udeb,
> make openssh-{client,server}-udeb depend on it, and put an
> /etc/nsswitch.conf in rootskel that gets rid of all the default
> references to libnss_compat (NIS i
On 24.IV.2004 at 20:27 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> and then went to the LVM configuration tool. But creating a VG told
> me that no physical volume (PV) exists... I went to a shell and pvscan
> could not find anything. fdisk showed that #7 was marked as LVM,
> though.
This is caused by
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 245704 lvmcfg
Bug#245704: didn't write changes before going to LVM
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `lvmcfg'.
> retitle 245704 can not use partitions with file system for physical volumes
Bug#245704: didn't write changes before going t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 246764 +moreinfo
Bug#246764: partitioning a plain new HD caused broken partitions
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
kernel-wedge_1.11_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing kernel-wedge_1.11_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2004 21:54:46 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed: Doesn't allow using existing partitions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Craig Comstock wrote:
> On inspecting
> http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/d-i/branches/d-i/beta4/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-i386/modules/i386/?rev=14662
>
> I see that pegasus is neither included in nic-modules
> nor nic-extra-modules. Maybe add it to
> nic-extra-modules? I am going to try and co
* Matthew Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 14:15]:
> I then go to configure LVM. it writes the map, etc. I hit VG. Create
> VG. Systems offers me a box to select PV. It lets me select with
> spacebar, but doesn't let me move to continue or go back. only way out
> of this is to hit ESC.
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I finally confirm that OS detection does NOT work on beta4. With my
> netinst i386 image, when os-prober is run, the NTFS modules udeb is
> not loaded and thus os-prober does not detect an existing installed
> W2K system.
>
> We should definitely update the errata page a
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2004 21:54:46 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed: Doesn't allow using existing partitions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Note that this depends on Bug#247177: Please provide a udeb
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Wright wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Grub does not detect the Windows 98 partition (/dev/hda3) when it was
> mounted as /windows during the partition step, claiming Debian was the
> only OS installed. Going back to the partition step and changing it to
> "Do not use" allows Grub to detect the W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 244821 minor
Bug#244821: drive names may be confusing to those expecting linux device names
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 247080 should look for already mounted OSes too
Bug#247080: Install report beta4
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 245027 minor
Bug#245027: Not obious how to reformat an existing partition
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 247080 os-prober
Bug#247080: Install report beta4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `os-prober'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 246700 os-prober
Bug#246700: os-prober: Does not detect Windows XP/2000 partitions
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-i386' to `os-prober'.
>
End of message, sto
Hi David!
First, let me echo Frans' welcome.
I am planning on re-working the powerpc architecture specific parts of
the installation manual and updating it for d-i/sarge .
About a month ago, I had just got through a preliminary pass at marking
which parts were out of date, which parts seemed to
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2004 21:21:21 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245159: Install Report with bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
System is a Dell Poweredge 600sc, with IDE Raid.
Sorry for any
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Alexander Nagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 01:16]:
Code: Bad EIP value
<0> Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!
I don't think it is a problem of the debian installer because it worked
without any problem.
BTW, what is a EIP value??
Did 2.4 work? Can you try te 2
Package: netcfg
Severity: wishlist
Using mii-diag -s you can find out whether the device is
actually connected... if if returns 2 (no link), automatic DHCP should
not even be tried.
- Forwarded message from Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
On 3.V.2004 at 18:28 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > Fill wishlist bug reports against partman-auto with subarchitecture
> > recipes. I will see how to implement them.
>
> When do you think will you have time for this?
This or next week.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Title: Turnkey
contaminate leather cheer marriott buck mute museum shave cucumber laocoon seamstress bauhaus certitude y dialect alpert gable curvilinear chanson sphere dirge kernighan butyrate spay vermiculite regime chile tensor asia nee panther accumulate apiece
rectory n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David,
First of all: great that you are taking an interest!
I am working on a Dutch translation and have been in contact with Miroslav
Kure over some general issues (like the restructuring of Ch 6 committed
yesterday).
In my mind the chapter
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 00:30]:
> > > I don't need it for a whole arch, but only for a sub-arch. So I guess
> > > partman-auto should check for recipes in:
> >
> > Anton, are you going to implement something like this?
>
> Fill wishlist bug reports against partman-auto w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 May 2004 08:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> What ever happened to the idea of sorting by ISO codes, which are
> probably easier to look for than English translations of one's native
> language?
That only works if you also include the ISO co
My dear !
Cialis available, no prescription need.. Lowest prices. Ciialis is a
newst impotencedr.g.
Up to 83 % of patients who take Ciaalis
experience an improovemeent in their erectioons.
Only 3 $ per dose!..
Wherefore chooose our company ??
- No prescription required
http://coolguy.biz/sv
hello,
does anyone have working 2.4.2x kernel (preferably the latest one) with qlogic
isp1020 and dec ethernet card support? i've spent all the saturday and today's
morning trying to compile one mysalef, but failed.
for archives, here's the story: i decided to change the 2.2.20 kernel installed
On 3.V.2004 at 13:56 (+0200) Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> But they have to justify it with real arguments, not fake
> arguments. The ones they give on their web site is currently a fake
> argument.
We are not in a position to decide which argument is real and which is
not. We already know -- th
Package: lvmcfg
Version: 0.24
Severity: minor
When I create a VG, it asks me for the name; but when I enter nothing
at all, no error is printed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.57_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.57_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc64-di_0.57_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc64-di_0.57_sparc.u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 1 May 04 05:01:31 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> This beta was by far the hardest for me (and probably others) of the
> four we've done, which is not too suprising, because each has been
> significantly harder then the one before it.
Good work, Joey.
> F
Hi!
Would it be possible to add a question about the default editor to the
installer? ATM, a lot af novice users are still stuck with vi when
using tools like reportbug.
(Alternatively, maybe the priority of novice-friendly editors should be
raised?)
--
Kind regards,
+--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-05-01 21:57, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I need some help from someone, who had spent more time translating using
> gettext than myself. The status pages for the debian-installer also
> included the "merged" stats, for checking whe
On inspecting
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/d-i/branches/d-i/beta4/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-i386/modules/i386/?rev=14662
I see that pegasus is neither included in nic-modules
nor nic-extra-modules. Maybe add it to
nic-extra-modules? I am going to try and compile
pegasus against kernel 2.4.2
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official NetInst Snapshot i386
Binary-1 (20040315), CD image downloaded from unknown location.
uname -a:
Linux flatline 2.6.5-1-686 #1 Tue Apr 27 23:39:55 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 4/30/04 from
cdimage.debian.org (beta4)
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24
08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 5/3/04
Method: business-card iso image, direct from cd and
with netdrivers floppy
Machine: Sony Vaio PCG-F350
Proce
I have this same problem with my laptop, a HP Pavilion ZE4502us.
I don't believe the problem is the keyboard locking up, but just not
being recognized by the kernel.
Install works just fine with Woody 3.0 kernel 2.20.20-idepci.
Nicholas H. Cramer
Malcolm Porter wrote:
Package: installation-r
Problem resolved. Needed to boot using "linux noapic nolapic"
sorry for the inconvenience.
Mal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 02/05/04
uname -a: couldnt get that far.
Date: 02/05/04
Method: Beta 4 Debian Installer CD Image x86
Machine: Sony Vaio PCG-GRT715M Laptop
Processor: Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (Not HT)
Memory: 1 Gig PC2100 (2x 512)
Root Device: IDE 60 Gig 7200rpm Hit
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 2.V.2004 at 23:20 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I recently reported this problem as 246723: does not complain if
> > there is no hard drive.
>
> I am not sure how to deal with this. There is a wishlist report for
> partman-nfs. Pe
Quoting Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I do not see how you can justify it by the Social Contract . You're
> basically trading the interest of 30 million people against that of
> 1 billion.
I do not really see where is the interest of 1 billion people when we
maintain strict compliance to a s
reassign 243679 partman-basicfilesystems
severity 243679 important
tags 243679 +help
thanks
Is it possible that this freeze was caused by too heavy cpu load or by
some hardware issue?
The swap test does simply "ped_file_system_check". I don't know what
does this libparted function.
Anton Zinovi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 243679 partman-basicfilesystems
Bug#243679: partman: when checking the existing swap partition on
powerpc/chrp/pegasos, freeze the box at around 37-41%.
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `partman-basicfilesystems'.
> severity 243679 im
Hello,
I have the same problem when i try to install sarge (linux26 kernel2.6)
with the beta4. I have no problem when i install (linux kernel2.4) on
the same pc (an vaio pcgfx702).
The install succed (i don't think so, that it is an installer problem)
but when i reboot i have this error:
call
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: -
Date: 05/03/2004 - 1pm
Method: Burned the iso and booted from the CD.
Machine: Samsung X30 (Notebook)
Processor: Intel Centrino
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:59:10AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-24 16:45]:
> > I encountered some minor problems during the install process:
> > While creating the filesystems, I selected /dev/hda1 and ext2 and
> > /boot. Then I selected /dev/hd
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:59:10AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-24 16:45]:
> > I use a pcmcia network card, but the PCMCIA bus was not correctly
> > configured (insmod of ds.o failed, because there was no socket driver
> > loaded), so the network
Your message dated Mon, 03 May 2004 19:28:26 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246927: lowmem: wrong truncation with netboot/netboot26
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
On 2.V.2004 at 23:20 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> Yes, I recently reported this problem as 246723: does not complain if
> there is no hard drive.
I am not sure how to deal with this. There is a wishlist report for
partman-nfs. People want to use debian-installer on diskless
machines.
A
On 2.V.2004 at 15:39 (-0700) Robert Hughes wrote:
>
> The drive I installed Sarge on already had two bootable partitions. When
> I made the Sarge partition (hdb5) bootable, the other bootable partitions
> were marked bootable. I tried making them bootable again, but the
> partition
> manager wo
On 2.V.2004 at 19:59 (+0200) Laurens Blankers wrote:
>
> BTW it is not entirely clear if 20% creates a partition of 20% of the
> total disc space or 20% of the free disc space.
None of these. :-)
My intention was 20% to mean that after the resizing, the partition
will contain about 20% free spa
On 1.V.2004 at 00:16 (+0200) Josef Zimmermann wrote:
> Partitionierung meldete keine Fehler, jedoch wurde die Formatierung der
> logischen Partitionen mit Fehlermeldung abgebrochen.
Could you give more information about what exactly failed with the
logical partitions.
> cfdisk meldete eine Ьbe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 243175 console-data
Bug#243175: bootkbd=fr has no effect
Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `console-data'.
> reassign 246725 console-data
Bug#246725: Dutch keyboard is uncommon in The Netherlands
Bug reassigned from package `kbd-cho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 247093 installation-reports
Bug#247093: Package installation-reports
Warning: Unknown package 'installation-reportspls'
Warning: Unknown package 'i'
Warning: Unknown package 'am'
Warning: Unknown package 'a'
Warning: Unknown package 'beginner'
On 3.V.2004 at 17:55 (+1000) Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I do not see how you can justify it by the Social Contract . You're
> basically trading the interest of 30 million people against that of
> 1 billion.
If I have to choose between insulting 30 milion or making 1 billion a
bit unhappy, I would d
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:19:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > It seems that apparently the last minute fix to the priority of the
> > ntfs-modules udeb was not done; probably my request to the ftp-master
> > was lost amoung all the other changes.
> >
> > I've checked, and the u
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:08:45AM +0200, Markus Amersdorfer wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-19,
> gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netins
> t.iso
Could you please try beta4? At least the following issues:
> The Partiti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 246841 -1
Bug#246841: qualified success on iBook G4
Bug 246841 cloned as bug 247095.
> reassign 246841 partman-newworld
Bug#246841: qualified success on iBook G4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-newworld'.
> retitle
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040430 from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 200405030900
Method: CD-image
Machine: SunBlade 150
Processor: UltraSparc IIe
Memory: 2 Gb
Root Device: IDE
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[E]
Confi
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Because, imho, this is a case where we plan to deviate from a
> standard. We have strong arguments for doing this, most of them being
> motivated by the Debian Social Contract (make our possible to benefit
I do not see how you can justify it by the
I finally confirm that OS detection does NOT work on beta4. With my
netinst i386 image, when os-prober is run, the NTFS modules udeb is
not loaded and thus os-prober does not detect an existing installed
W2K system.
We should definitely update the errata page about this. Maybe even
make some follo
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:50:54 +0200, David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The previous mails in this thread seems to suggest that all issues
> have got a sufficient answer. Is anyone against closing this report?
Nope, go ahead.
Just for completeness, I think most of the Gnome problems cou
73 matches
Mail list logo
