the minor renaming [1]

Thiemo has committed his excellent revamped build/, so all of our image names have changed. This will probably break most daily builds, CD builds, and some documentation. Here's how the new setup looks for i386: dest |-- cdrom | |-- boot.img | |-- initrd.gz | `-- vmlinuz |-- floppy | |-- a

[ANNOUNCE] d-i boot logo gallery

Hello all, As you may know Sarge is to have a boot logo on bootup through Syslinux (hence on i386 only for now.) I've set up a web page gallery of the possible candidates for said logo here: http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/ It currently houses three logos by these fine artists: * Matthe

Bug#231318: marked as done (Failed installation on old Pentium system)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:07:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#230894: marked as done (debootstrap error 127)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:12:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Processing Installation Report #231318

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231318 -1 Bug#231318: Failed installation on old Pentium system Bug 231318 cloned as bug 231655. > reassign -1 netcfg Bug#231655: Failed installation on old Pentium system Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'. > retitle

Bug#231048: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:53:20 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Processing Installation Report #231048

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231048 -1 Bug#231048: Installation report Bug 231048 cloned as bug 231653. > reassign -1 base-installer Bug#231653: Installation report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'. > retitle -1 Reverts to http download

Bug#224226: marked as done (debian-installer: Needs to install language specific packages)

Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 11:15:47 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line status of bug #224226 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#231600: marked as done (Package: installation-reports /// sarge-i386-netinst /// Daily Build)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:00:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231495: marked as done (installation report)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:00:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231405: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:02:36 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231402: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:03:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231492: marked as done (Install Report)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231502: marked as done (Installation-reports)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:00:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231507: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:00:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#231573: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:00:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: tagging 215508

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 215508 pending Bug#215508: floppy image names confusing Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Re: Tagging install reports that have been triaged

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 08:46:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Just close the report, thanking the submitter for his report and > mentioning that it's been processed.. Awesome. That's way better. Will do. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Tagging install reports that have been triaged

David Nusinow wrote: >So, in an effort to reduce redundant work, should we be tagging the > install reports that have been processed in some way? Perhaps with > pending? Ideally, there'd be a triaged tag of some kind, but pending > seems to be the best solution for now. Are there any objections

Processed: tagging 227852

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 227852 + pending Bug#227852: kbd-chooser: [PATCH] wrong name for sparc/sun keyboard There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#226447: marked as done (updated ofboot.b (Was: sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso not bootable))

Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 01:49:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug #226447 -- powerpc knowledge needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: upgading sparc d-i bugs to release-critical

On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 18:13, Blars Blarson wrote: > The first six bugs in the list below are the ones I am talking about. > All have patches in the BTS and have been sitting unfixed for a couple > of weeks. Unless someone convinces me otherwise, I'll upgrade them to > grave in two days. This doe

Processed: reassign 230860 to debian-cd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 230860 debian-cd Bug#230860: memtest86 boot image [i386] Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debian-cd'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 224226

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 224226 - fixed Bug#224226: debian-installer: Needs to install language specific packages Tags were: fixed pending d-i Tags removed: fixed > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: severity of 229904 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 229904 normal Bug#229904: installation-reports: notebook screen problems Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: reassign 231635 to netcfg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231635 netcfg Bug#231635: debian-installer: surviving dhclient prevents static IP (re-)configuration Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `netcfg'. > End of m

Processed: tagging 225584

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 225584 pending Bug#225584: make cd_image requires updated mtools Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#229886: marked as done (Installation report Sarge)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:40:49 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cannot read bug report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#226105: marked as done (powerpc: sleep not found)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:31:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#228519: marked as done ([PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:39:27 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#225370: marked as done (debian-installer: cannot start init on powerpc)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:30:17 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#224226: status of bug #224226

Should bug #224226 remain open? If so, what needs to be done to fix it properly? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Processing Installation-Report #231402

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231402 -1 Bug#231402: installation-reports Bug 231402 cloned as bug 231643. > reassign -1 partconf Bug#231643: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'. > retitle -1 Fails to detect already initialize

Processed: reassign 230501 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 230501 installation-reports Bug#230501: Installation report Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'. > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: reassign 230095 to kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-pmac

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 230095 kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-pmac Bug#230095: debian-installer: crackling sound on Macintosh PowerBook G3 Lombard Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `k

Processed: tagging 228519

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 228519 pending Bug#228519: [PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc Tags were: pending Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: tagging 227853

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 227853 pending Bug#227853: debian-installer: [PATCH] small fix for sparc, installs discover-udeb Tags were: pending Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing h

Processed: tagging 229904

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 229904 pending Bug#229904: installation-reports: notebook screen problems Tags were: pending Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: tagging 228519

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 228519 pending Bug#228519: [PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Processing Installation-Report #231405

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231405 -1 Bug#231405: installation-reports Bug 231405 cloned as bug 231642. > reassign -1 ethdetect Bug#231642: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `ethdetect'. > retitle -1 Failed to configure ne2000 NIC B

Processed: reassign 226599 to hw-detect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 226599 hw-detect Bug#226599: Error while running modprobe Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Processed: reassign 226354 to partconf

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 226354 partconf Bug#226354: can't select swap partition Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partconf'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Processed: reassign 225622 to hw-detect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 225622 hw-detect Bug#225622: pcmcia RequestIRQ problem (was Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain) Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `h

Bug#221727: marked as done (netinsts CD prompts for distro to install, should use what's on the CD instead)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:28:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#226130: marked as done (usb keyboard not configured in 2nd stage of installation)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:22:25 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line usb keyboard problem should be fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#231454: marked as done (Shows wrong menus keyboard.tst, mta.tst, pon.tst)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:17:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#231454: fixed in base-config 2.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#229316: marked as done (Double space in sources.list after apt-setup)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:17:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229316: fixed in base-config 2.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#229317: marked as done (Contrib selected in apt-setup while user wasn't asked for it)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:17:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229317: fixed in base-config 2.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#221116: marked as done (USB mouse does not work after reboot)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:26:49 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line USB mouse problem should be fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: reassign 222308 to hw-detect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 222308 hw-detect Bug#222308: PCMCIA doesn't work with Dell Latitude LM Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'. > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: tagging 222724

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 222724 d-i Bug#222724: cdrom mounting all inconsistent and screwey There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: reassign 220936 to discover

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 220936 discover Bug#220936: ide-scsi breaks use of CD after reboot Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover'. > End of message, stopping processing here

Processed: reassign 221508 to ethdetect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 221508 ethdetect Bug#221508: cardmgr not loaded, or failed to find 3COM 3CCFE574BT Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `ethdetect'. > End of message, stoppin

Processed: severity of 231380 is minor

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 231380 minor Bug#231380: devfs devices names are confusing to skilled users Severity set to `minor'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tagging 229062

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 229062 d-i Bug#229062: wrong kernel image, reboot fails There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: reassign 229062 to base-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 229062 base-installer Bug#229062: wrong kernel image, reboot fails Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-installer'. > End of message, stopping processin

Processed: reassign 221983 to discover

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 221983 discover Bug#221983: ide-scsi problem again, with a solution: /dev/sr0 in fstab! Bug#224634: discover loads ide-scsi module, which prevents apt from accessing some i

Processed: reassign 231370 to kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231370 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic Bug#231370: qlogic driver fails on Alpha Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic'. > End of m

Tagging install reports that have been triaged

Hi, So, in an effort to reduce redundant work, should we be tagging the install reports that have been processed in some way? Perhaps with pending? Ideally, there'd be a triaged tag of some kind, but pending seems to be the best solution for now. Are there any objections? - David Nusinow --

Re: upgading sparc d-i bugs to release-critical

Blars Blarson wrote: > 227853debian-installer > debian-installer: [PATCH] small fix for sparc, installs discover-udeb > > 228519debian-installer > [PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc Both of these are long fixed in CVS. They will be closed with the next upload of the deb

base-config_2.11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-config_2.11.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.11.dsc base-config_2.11.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.11.tar.gz base-config_2.11_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.11_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 229316 229317 2

bug #226447 -- powerpc knowledge needed

I'd like to do whatever is necessary to fix bug #226447, but I am not in a position to work on it as it s a powerpc problem needing a fixed ofboot.b. Could someone please verify the fix, and apply it, or close the bug if it was already fixed in another way? Also, debian-cd has a ofboot.b as well..

Processing of base-config_2.11_i386.changes

base-config_2.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.11.dsc base-config_2.11.tar.gz base-config_2.11_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#231634: modconf dialog has broken text

Package: modconf Version: 0.2.45 On a virgin installation of Debian Sarge, I invoked modconf to try to get my 8139too module to load on demand. After selecting the net driver list and the 8139too module, this dialog appeared: Title: 8139too Text: "Install this module in the" Options: The te

Bug#231635: debian-installer: surviving dhclient prevents static IP (re-)configuration

Package: debian-installer Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-08 Severity: normal In the default debconf priority, the installer eagerly graps a DHCP lease without asking the user. If the user is not happy with this and wants to go back and manually configure the network, then network re-configuration

Bug#229315: marked as done (Should offer possible removal of temporarily needed packages)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:31:36 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line read-edid and mdetect removal has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#227291: marked as done (mklibs: needs to handle symbols starting with . for sparc)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Feb 2004 18:38:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: retitle 220704 to ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 220704 ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom Bug#220704: wrong CDROM instantiation Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: merging 224528 220704

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > merge 224528 220704 Bug#220704: wrong CDROM instantiation Bug#224528: cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0 Merged 220704 224528. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Processed: reassign 224528 to discover

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 224528 discover Bug#224528: cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0 Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `discover'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: reassign 220704 to discover

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 220704 discover Bug#220704: wrong CDROM instantiation Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `discover'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: severity of 224403 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 224403 wishlist Bug#224403: deletes debs after install Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Re: upgading sparc d-i bugs to release-critical

On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 12:24:32AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Blars Blarson] > > Unless someone convinces me otherwise, I'll upgrade them to grave in > > two days. > > You seem to assume that raising the priority will make someone fix the > bug faster. I believe this assumption is wrong

Bug#231625: marked as done (Complains about valid hostname)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:11:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: reassign 231628 to passwd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231628 passwd Bug#231628: Does not use MD5 passwords even when configured to do so Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `passwd'. > End of message, stopping proces

Re: upgading sparc d-i bugs to release-critical

[Blars Blarson] > Unless someone convinces me otherwise, I'll upgrade them to grave in > two days. You seem to assume that raising the priority will make someone fix the bug faster. I believe this assumption is wrong. In my view, it is completely useless to change the priority. If you want the

upgading sparc d-i bugs to release-critical

It's about time that the bugs that need to be fixed for sparc d-i to work to be upgraded to release-critical. The beta-2 crunch seems to have calmed down, and I'm aproaching being able to build a working d-i cd with local fixes and hacks around these bugs. The first six bugs in the list below are

Re: debian-installer/main-menu/debian changelog,1.239,1.240

Denis Barbier wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/main-menu/debian > In directory quantz:/tmp/cvs-serv16866/debian > > Modified Files: > changelog > Log Message: > When a package is reconfigured, set debconf/showold to true and > restore the previous value after executing packa

Processed: Fix assignment of 231625

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 231625 base-config Bug#231625: Complains about valid hostname Warning: Unknown package 'baseconfig' Bug reassigned from package `baseconfig' to `base-config'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: Processing Installation-Report #231492

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231492 -1 Bug#231492: Install Report Bug 231492 cloned as bug 231627. > reassign -1 partconf Bug#231627: Install Report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'. > retitle -1 Should check for existence of boot partition B

Bug#231626: base-installer: kernel-image is not installed, causing boot loader install to fail

Package: base-installer Severity: normal Hello, I'm not sure if this has been fixed or not, but please see bugs 231573 and all those it is merged with. - David Nusinow -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architectu

Processed: Processing Installation-Report #231495

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 231495 -1 Bug#231495: installation report Bug 231495 cloned as bug 231624. > reassign -1 partconf Bug#231624: installation report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'. > retitle -1 Fails to display correct partition t

Processed: No Kernel-Image Install Causes Bootloader Install to Fail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 231573 231600 Bug#231573: installation-reports Bug#231600: Package: installation-reports /// sarge-i386-netinst /// Daily Build Merged 231573 231600. > merge 231573 231507 Bug#231507: Installation report Bug#231573: installation-reports Bug#23160

Bug#229648: cdebconf: "seen" handling broken

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:03:11PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: [...] > With the attached patch, udpkg should work as expected. AFAICT there is > no nned to be smart and reset DEBCONF_SHOWOLD to its previous value. > But I cannot test d-i on my box, this is why I am reluctant to apply > such patche

Re: Some characters fail to appear in d-i

On Saturday 07 February 2004 23:08, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > This is probably related to bug #219333 and #231453. The problem > is that all characters not used on the first floppy is not > available in the reduced font. The code to reload the font when > the full font is available is in plac

Re: Some characters fail to appear in d-i

[Konstantinos Margaritis] > The following characters fail to appear throughout the installer: > > * greek capital chi (X), unicode 0x03A7 > * greek capital ypsilon (Y), unicode 0x03A5 This is probably related to bug #219333 and #231453. The problem is that all characters not used on the first fl

Bug#231617: The message "Downloading the Release file" is not localized

Package: choose-mirror Severity: minor Tags: l10n I have used Greek language, but I have not found it even in the other ..po files, it's only mentioned in the .templates file so I guess it was overlooked. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sil

Bug#231618: busybox-cvs-udeb: please don't build modutils for sparc

Package: busybox-cvs-udeb Severity: wishlist Tags: sid d-i Since busybox does not build usable modutils (depmod, insmod) on sparc, (see bug 231606) please diable building them. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architect

Some characters fail to appear in d-i

The following characters fail to appear throughout the installer: * greek capital chi (X), unicode 0x03A7 * greek capital ypsilon (Y), unicode 0x03A5 which package do I file the bug on (bterm?). Actually, I have just checked bterm on its own (current debian package version 0.1.15-1) and it has

Processed: Re: Bug#231606: busybox-cvs-udeb: busybox depmod and insmod fail on sparc64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 231606 wishlist Bug#231606: busybox-cvs-udeb: busybox depmod and insmod fail on sparc64 Severity set to `wishlist'. > retitle 231606 busybox-cvs-udeb - modutils should support biarch Bug#231606: busybox-cvs-udeb: busybox depmod and insmod fail

Bug#231606: busybox-cvs-udeb: busybox depmod and insmod fail on sparc64

severity 231606 wishlist retitle 231606 busybox-cvs-udeb - modutils should support biarch thanks On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 11:10:55AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > busybox insmod and depmod appear not to understand sparc64 and > complain about wrong architecture when used on a sparc64 box. They > n

Bug#231600: Package: installation-reports /// sarge-i386-netinst /// Daily Build

Christophe Lejeune wrote: Anything work until the installation of LILO. /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun/disc is proposed, then the gui come back on the same proposal again and again. I have tried /dev/had with no success. After reboot, it still doesnt work LILO seem not to have been installed...

Re: d-i beta 2: Wrong time for clock set to UTC

Andree Leidenfrost wrote: > When installing, the system time gets set to RTC time. However, my RTC > is set to UTC. Given that I'm in Sydney, I end up 11 hours out. > I'm pretty sure that the woody installer (or a package) used to asked > whether my hardware clock was set to UTC. The current instal

Bug#231606: busybox-cvs-udeb: busybox depmod and insmod fail on sparc64

Package: busybox-cvs-udeb Severity: important Tags: sid busybox insmod and depmod appear not to understand sparc64 and complain about wrong architecture when used on a sparc64 box. They need to detect sparc64 (uname -m) and switch elf formats supported. ~ # insmod sr_mod Using /lib/modules/2.4.2

Bug#231601: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 02-january-2004 - from official debian.org (http.us.debian.org/) uname-a: Linux kibi 2.6.2 #13 Sat Feb 7 01:40:56 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux (later installed custom kernel)Date: Wednesday 4 februari Method: Network install from floppy, using mir

Bug#231600: Package: installation-reports /// sarge-i386-netinst /// Daily Build

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Build of the day : 2/6/2004 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: unfortunatelly, linux doesn't boot :-( Date: 2/7/2004 Method: Booting from the CD, in a local network with no proxy...

libdebian-installer_0.19_s390.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.19_s390.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.19_s390.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.19_s390.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.19_s390.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.19_s3

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.19_s390.changes

libdebian-installer_0.19_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdebian-installer4_0.19_s390.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.19_s390.deb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.19_s390.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.19_s390.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.19_s

Re: Test ISO for a possible languagechooser/countrychooser scheme (was: Countrychooser changes)

Christian Perrier wrote: > When languagechooser/language is xx alone (type 1 or type 3 with > "Other"), the short country list is first shown. This short list > allows to choose "Other" again for getting the whole world country list > > With this scheme, users with "high" priority will have only o

d-i installer beta 2: Suggestion for fewer screens (apt-installation)

Dear d-i developers I noticed that you are discussing ways to bring down the number of configuration screens during the install process. Here's my 2 cents contribution: I would like to propose the use of apt-spy to automatically determine the fastest source for network installs. This has been dis

  1   2   >