3PI'm pleased to report that, thanks to the help of Santiago Garcia
Mantinan, a bootable d-i netinst CD is now available for linux-alpha at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/alpha/ alongside the
existing i386 images. The CD should be bootable on any SRM-capable
alpha system; if anyon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 211092 + d-i
Bug#211092: building debian-installer on sparc fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 211315 + pending
Bug#211315: cdebconf: SEGVs on console-tools/arch input
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Hello,
(Hello ley & madkiss ;-)
At the debian day on Linuxtag 2003 there was a talk about D-I.
Where can I find the source of the PDF that where presented?
Please hit me with an URL.
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:45:37AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I can't find any bugs filed against this (there is one for kbd-chooser, but
> that's a different issue)
Doh, I did file one myself a while ago (#211315). Added the correct Closes:
line to CVS; apologies for the extra mail. :-)
Hi,
I've fixed the problem with kbd-chooser crashing the cdebconf frontend
(making it impossible to run it). The problem in this case was that the
template in question (console-tools/archs) didn't have an extended
description, and thus returned NULL. The frontends expected
question_get_field() to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 211243 + pending
Bug#211243: autopartkit: package description is wrong
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
> tags 211300 + pending
Bug#211300: netcfg-dhcp: does not include an /etc/network directory
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
> tags
I've updated the package description in current CVS, so this should be fixed
in next upload.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch has been applied in current CVS.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, the patch did not get included last time -- attaching it now.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
diff -ur busybox-cvs-0.60.99.cvs20030819/debian/config-udeb
busybox-cvs-patched/debian/config-udeb
--- busybox-cvs-0.60.99.cvs20030819/debian/config-udeb 2003-09-17 23:15:05.00
Package: busybox-cvs-udeb
Version: 0.60.99.cvs20030819 (not installed)
Severity: normal
Tags: patch d-i
busybox-cvs-udeb should be built with CONFIG_FEATURE_WGET_STATUSBAR.
Rationale:
1) It is very useful during large downloads (or on slow links) to
display some kind of progress information to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:29:33PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> --- base-installer.templates 30 Jul 2003 07:37:23 - 1.4
> +++ base-installer.templates 17 Sep 2003 02:29:31 - 1.5
> @@ -85,11 +85,9 @@
>
> Template: base-installer/debootstrap/fallback-progress
> Type:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:26:00PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
> What about asking for help at debian-doc or debian-sgml ???
I wrote in my initial post:
If there are volunteers to do this job, will this solution
be considered, or are there good reasons to keep marked sections?
So I d
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:34:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#211260: rootskel: /linuxrc should include path for chroot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:34:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#211260: rootskel: /linuxrc should include path for chroot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:08:07AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Package: rootskel
> > Version: 0.36
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch d-i
> >
> > /linuxrc has a line saying
> >
> > exec chroot . /linuxrc /dev/console
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:41:43AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:01:02PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> [...]
> > I can work on it, but I need to know how to attack it. I do think
> > there are good reasons to keep the marked sections. Just considering
> > arches alone, we
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 01:31, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 19:56, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > Severity: minor
> > Perhaps I'm alone in thinking this, but surely this is kinda more
> > important than
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Package: rootskel
> Version: 0.36
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch d-i
>
> /linuxrc has a line saying
>
> exec chroot . /linuxrc /dev/console 2>&1
>
> On my own images, I've had problems with this script not finding chroot
20 matches
Mail list logo
