Re: Processing of base-installer_0.025_i386.changes

2003-07-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Martin Sjögren] > Aiih. Who's (tried to?) upload base-installer? It won't work without > the new version of debootstrap that aj and I worked on during > debcamp... Is this related to the progress bar? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

MailMonitor for Exchange has processed a suspicious mail

2003-07-21 Thread MMEX_SA_SALEM
A mail sent by you has been identified as suspicious by MailMonitor for Exchange. Event: infection Action: Message quarantined Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message subject:W32.Klez.E removal tools Recipient: "[EMAIL P

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-21 Thread Cardenas
I'd be interested if it was in'near the US, as I live in san diego, but I guess there isnt much chance of that happening. ;) On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:58:45PM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote: > * Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > How many are interested in going to such event? Where are you > > locat

Re: d-i build problem

2003-07-21 Thread Robert Lemmen
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote: > i just cvs'ed the d-i sources to play around a little bit with it, and > after some fiddling i get it to build a little bit. but then in the > library reduction phase it just loops, currently it is at pass 126. > > is this normal? ho

d-i build problem

2003-07-21 Thread Robert Lemmen
hi folks, i just cvs'ed the d-i sources to play around a little bit with it, and after some fiddling i get it to build a little bit. but then in the library reduction phase it just loops, currently it is at pass 126. is this normal? how many passes are to expect? if not, what can i do to get out

Manage from script and bash file configuration

2003-07-21 Thread Della Bianca giuseppe
Hi. Excuse me if the email not of your interest. The GesConf program ( http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gesconf ) allows the manage from console and script of the configuration file: GesConf >= 0.1.2 * library for the options of the command line support: - it manages multiple option (ex. -v

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-21 Thread Sebastian Ley
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > How many are interested in going to such event? Where are you > located in the world? I'm interested, and I'm located in Oslo, > Norway. I'd like to participate, although I am presently not in the situation to plan 3 months in advance. I live in Aachen, Germany wh

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-21 Thread Thorsten Sauter
* Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-21 09:44]: | How many are interested in going to such event? Where are you located | in the world? I'm interested, and I'm located in Oslo, Norway. Very interessted. I hope raidmgr is finished then :) I'm living in Stuttgart/Germany (in the sout

Re: Why should prebaseconfig depend on created-fstab?

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-07-21 klockan 15.16 skrev Ole-Egil Hvitmyren: > And prep and a few others don't use a filesystem on the boot partition, > so same applies here. There's no reference to the boot partition in fstab. > But still, /etc/fstab never hurt anyone, so I fail to see how > bootable-system depending

Re: Why should prebaseconfig depend on created-fstab?

2003-07-21 Thread Ole-Egil Hvitmyren
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Petter Reinholdtsen | Why would prebaseconfig need to depend on created-fstab? I believe it | should be sufficient to depend on bootable-system, and let the boot | loaders depend on created-fstab. Do not all the providers of | bootable-system need /target/etc/fstab to

Re: Processing of base-installer_0.025_i386.changes

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-07-21 klockan 14.30 skrev Archive Administrator: > kernel-installer_0.025_all.udeb doesn't exist > base-installer_0.025_i386.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now > deleted > All files it mentions are also removed: > base-installer_0.025.dsc, base-installer_0.025.tar.gz,

Processing of base-installer_0.025_i386.changes

2003-07-21 Thread Archive Administrator
kernel-installer_0.025_all.udeb doesn't exist base-installer_0.025_i386.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now deleted All files it mentions are also removed: base-installer_0.025.dsc, base-installer_0.025.tar.gz, kernel-installer_0.025_all.udeb, base-installer_0.025_i386.udeb Gr

Re: Why should prebaseconfig depend on created-fstab?

2003-07-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Petter Reinholdtsen | Why would prebaseconfig need to depend on created-fstab? I believe it | should be sufficient to depend on bootable-system, and let the boot | loaders depend on created-fstab. Do not all the providers of | bootable-system need /target/etc/fstab to do their magic? some ch

How are you doing ?

2003-07-21 Thread mpp31757
Title: ai fammi sognare ai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non posso aspettare Succhiami così leggermente ancora ... ancora di più ... di più Mi sento umida Toccami! Mmmhh...dai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non po

baseconfig-udeb_0.014_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: baseconfig-udeb_0.014.dsc to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.014.dsc baseconfig-udeb_0.014.tar.gz to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.014.tar.gz baseconfig-udeb_0.014_all.udeb to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.014_all.udeb Announcing to [EM

Is cdebconf 0.39 uploader or not?

2003-07-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
In CVS, the changelog indicates that version 0.39 is uploaded into the achive, but http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cdebconf.html> indicate that the latest upload is v0.38. What is correct? As the 0.39 tag is missing, I changed the changelog file to use 'UNRELEASED' for 0.39. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Skolelinux is thinking about how to speed up the d-i development, and one idea is to sponsor a debian-installer debcamp 2-3 months from now. It should be located somewhere close to many (most) d-i developers to limit the travel cost, and should be a low-cost event overall. I've asked Kurt Gramlic

ddetect_0.34_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ddetect_0.34.dsc to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.34.dsc ddetect_0.34.tar.gz to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.34.tar.gz ethdetect_0.34_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.34_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.34_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.34_all.udeb hw-detec

Bug#201740: marked as done (rootskel: Files in /lib/debian-installer.d/ break mklibs)

2003-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 02:47:22 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#201740: fixed in rootskel 0.34 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

rootskel_0.34_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: rootskel-locale_0.34_i386.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.34_i386.udeb rootskel_0.34.dsc to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.34.dsc rootskel_0.34.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.34.tar.gz rootskel_0.34_i386.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.34_i386.u