On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:39:39PM -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> The problem is that when I select "create filesystem" the only partition
> thats offered is part5, which already has a reiser filesystem on it.
>
> I even tried creating my own reiserfs on part6, and it still doesn't
> show up. A
I tried to install sarge with tollef's latest netinst floppy image.
My laptop is already partitioned, and it has 7 partitions, and so in
the installer I just load the modules to detect the hard drive, and
skip the partitioning.
The problem is that when I select "create filesystem" the only part
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_0.022.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.022.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.022.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.022.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.022_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.022_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clo
prebaseconfig_0.022_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
prebaseconfig_0.022.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.022.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.022_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:17:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Joey Hess]
> > Why would we want to make that an option? It doesn't sound like a
> > good kind of option, it just buys you more complexity and more ways
> > to fail for no gain. I am not interested in supporting people who
> >
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:24:39PM -0200, Andr? Lu?s Lopes wrote:
> Sorry if it's a FAQ, but I wasn't able to figure out by myself where the
> messages which were sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are being sent now. I was
> used to check this list daily looking for any changes within CVS
> templates so I
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:15:25AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> I'm in the process of getting sarge on my new computer. I thought that
> would give me a nice chance to do some testing on the new
> debian-installer. I used the business-card iso btw. I do have a lot of
> comments an want to do some b
Hi,
Sorry if it's a FAQ, but I wasn't able to figure out by myself where the
messages which were sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are being sent now. I was
used to check this list daily looking for any changes within CVS
templates so I could easily update my translations and commit them.
Could someone g
Hi,
I'm in the process of getting sarge on my new computer. I thought that
would give me a nice chance to do some testing on the new
debian-installer. I used the business-card iso btw. I do have a lot of
comments an want to do some bug reporting, but I don't know which
package to report on. So may
[Matt Kraai]
> I don't care which we default to eventually. In the short term,
> though, we should not default to grub-installer until bug #177725 is
> fixed.
Well, sure. We need to fix both the lilo and grub problems. Both
list of bugs are related to the debian packages, and not with the
upstr
[Jouni Tulkki]
> Why doesn't the network install iso image (80mb version) have all
> network drivers? I have a Realtek card and the installer says that
> it cannot load the appropriate module. Is there any way that I can
> get that module from somewhere?
Is this rtl8139? The driver changed name f
[Joey Hess]
> Why would we want to make that an option? It doesn't sound like a
> good kind of option, it just buys you more complexity and more ways
> to fail for no gain. I am not interested in supporting people who
> try to do that with base-config.
It saves me a reboot, and speeds up the insta
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The previous versions of Debian used lilo, bug I am not sure why. At
> this time, grub is working quite well, and it includes a few features
> making it my boot loader of choice. But grub will fail with some
> BIOSes and disk
Bruce Sass wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
At the moment we have two boot loaders for i386 available. Both
lilo-installer and grub-installer are available. One of them need to
be the default choice. The default choice will probably be used by
most first time installers,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> At the moment we have two boot loaders for i386 available. Both
> lilo-installer and grub-installer are available. One of them need to
> be the default choice. The default choice will probably be used by
> most first time installers, and will also
Moin Markus!
Markus Schabel schrieb am Wednesday, den 05. February 2003:
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> >Use floppies and read in the manuall about kernel replacement. However,
> >the old driver CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD680 is enabled in the new kernel of
> >next (testing) release of boot-floppies. Please lo
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Which boot loader should we make the default for i386? I suggest
> making grub the default. The lilo boot loader should be included as
> an option, until grub work on all the machines where lilo will work.
I don't care which
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
At the moment we have two boot loaders for i386 available. Both
lilo-installer and grub-installer are available. One of them need to
be the default choice. The default choice will probably be used by
most first time installers, and will also work as a recommondation
f
At the moment we have two boot loaders for i386 available. Both
lilo-installer and grub-installer are available. One of them need to
be the default choice. The default choice will probably be used by
most first time installers, and will also work as a recommondation
from the Debian installation
I located mapdevfs in the di-utils-mount-partitions package, which is
not installed when I use autopartkit. I believe the mapdevfs program
must be moved into another package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> When choosing "Install LILO on the hard disk" from d-i main-menu, I
> get a question about where to install the boot block, accept the
> default, and then the installer failed with this error message:
>
> [default = /dev/scsi
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I've made a small udeb to run base-config from d-i, and will test it
> some more before I check it into Debian CVS. It would then be
> optional if base-config should run before or after reboot from HD.
Why would we want to make that an option? It doesn't sound like a
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:45:45AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> ons 2003-02-05 klockan 07.36 skrev Matt Kraai:
> > To fix bug 148606, I'd like to change choose-mirror and
> > cdrom-detect to use stable, testing, and unstable instead of sarge
> > and sid.
> >
> > I'll also need to change base-ins
Package: lilo-installer
Version: 0.0.8
Severity: grave
When choosing "Install LILO on the hard disk" from d-i main-menu, I
get a question about where to install the boot block, accept the
default, and then the installer failed with this error message:
[default = /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lu
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:32:10PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:39:24 -0800,
> > "MC" == Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MC> Yes, the udeb should have the package name libpango1.0-0-udeb, if it
> MC> doesn't already.
>
> MC> You're talking about th
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Use floppies and read in the manuall about kernel replacement. However,
the old driver CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD680 is enabled in the new kernel of
next (testing) release of boot-floppies. Please look at
http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/ and report the results.
The module 3c5
OK, I have a different problem. I decided to try out the Woody b24f instead
of the vanilla. After playing around with it a while, I eventually figure
out that I had to include a "nomce" option to get around the machine check
exception that it keeps causing a kernel panic at startup. Now, I can't
in
OK, it's my fault since I am new to Linux and was not too clear on what was
being booted. Basically, I had some difficulty getting the dual boot from NT
to work properly, and for some reason this machine can't be boot from the
USB based floppy. I have been using the install disc to boot the system
Your message dated 05 Feb 2003 13:46:44 +
with message-id <1044452804.2110.16.camel@coll>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Jouni Tulkki wrote:
> Why doesn't the network install iso image (80mb version) have all network
> drivers? I have a Realtek card and the installer says that it cannot load the
> appropriate module. Is there any way that I can get that module from
> somew
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:19:49AM -0500, Paul Siu wrote:
> I have a strange problem that I can't figure out. I am attempting to install
> Debian Woody 3.0 on my machine. I boot up on disc 2 (Vanilla) and attempt to
> install. Unfortunately, I notice that the kernel it install is the idepci
> versi
Why doesn't the network install iso image (80mb version) have all network
drivers? I have a Realtek card and the installer says that it cannot load the
appropriate module. Is there any way that I can get that module from
somewhere?
I think it is idiotic that the the network installer doesn't h
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> Tollef and I have been discussing what to do with Release files. The
> current state of anna is that it tries
> main/debian-installer/binary-$(ARCH)/Packages*
> local/debian-installer/binary-$(ARCH)/Packages*
> This is suboptimal
[Matt Kraai]
> To fix bug 148606, I'd like to change choose-mirror and
> cdrom-detect to use stable, testing, and unstable instead of sarge
> and sid.
Remember that the CDs contain symlinks for most suite names, so it is
not enough to check if cdrom/dists/${suite}/ exits.
> Any objections?
If th
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:54:33AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> mån 2003-02-03 klockan 19.42 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> > [Denis Barbier]
> > > Sure, it is really nice, thanks.
> > > We could then put merged PO files online and update them automatically
> > > so that translators do not need a f
mån 2003-02-03 klockan 19.42 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Denis Barbier]
> > Sure, it is really nice, thanks.
> > We could then put merged PO files online and update them automatically
> > so that translators do not need a full checkout of debian-ibstaller.
>
> Where should I put it? Somewhere i
ons 2003-02-05 klockan 07.36 skrev Matt Kraai:
> Howdy,
>
> To fix bug 148606, I'd like to change choose-mirror and
> cdrom-detect to use stable, testing, and unstable instead of sarge
> and sid.
>
> I'll also need to change base-installer to retrieve the Release
> file and use it to determine th
Tollef and I have been discussing what to do with Release files. The
current state of anna is that it tries
main/debian-installer/binary-$(ARCH)/Packages*
local/debian-installer/binary-$(ARCH)/Packages*
This is suboptimal. :)
There are a few problems with getting this information from Release
38 matches
Mail list logo
