At the moment we have two boot loaders for i386 available. Both lilo-installer and grub-installer are available. One of them need to be the default choice. The default choice will probably be used by most first time installers, and will also work as a recommondation from the Debian installation team to our users.
The previous versions of Debian used lilo, bug I am not sure why. At this time, grub is working quite well, and it includes a few features making it my boot loader of choice. But grub will fail with some BIOSes and disk controllers. I guess lilo will fail with others. Which boot loader should we make the default for i386? I suggest making grub the default. The lilo boot loader should be included as an option, until grub work on all the machines where lilo will work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]