I have encountered problems installing
Debian
>The "boot.bat" on the cd does not work.
Apparently the "choose" command is not recognized by my system when booted with
a Windoze boot disk
>when I manuall enter the "loadlin" command
line, I get an "invalid compression type" error using "
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:00:23PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right list, but I'm gonna try here (I'm also
> subscribed to several other of the Debian lists, including debian-user,
> so if this question belongs there, please excuse my faux pas).
>
> Currently I'
Your message dated Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DONE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 174050 normal
Bug#174050: Unable to install via loadlin
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 174050 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#174050: Unable to install via loadlin
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> than
severity 174050 normal
tags 174050 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
A-Ha. Sorry, your paths are Windows paths and do not tell us ANYTHING
about which device is C, which is D, etc. Also, a problem with the
bsdmainutils package has almost nothing in common with loadlin, so I
wonder about your bug de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 174050 normal
Bug#174050: Unable to install via loadlin
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 174050 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#174050: Unable to install via loadlin
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:31:37 -0800
with message-id <20030130223137.GC1233@catalunya>
and subject line no feedback
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 155379 boot-floppies
Bug#155379: Woody install problem
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `boot-floppies'.
> reassign 178832 boot-floppies
Bug#178832: Woody/SPARC network install error
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `boot-flopp
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:51:12 -0700
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The kernel compresses itself using gzip, so upx isn't likely to
> be useful there. It would be much more useful when used on the
> rest of userspace. Though I suspect you would get better results
> by simply switching
I'm not sure if this is the right list, but I'm gonna try here (I'm also
subscribed to several other of the Debian lists, including debian-user,
so if this question belongs there, please excuse my faux pas).
Currently I'm running RedHat 7.2 on my main machine. I want to install
Debian on a seco
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:17:15AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 23:29, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > kbd-chooser segmentation faults when I choose it.
>
> Under what conditions did this occur? (a CDROM install, net-floppy,
> make-demo, etc.)
A custom-built net-floppy[1].
> Di
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:38:06AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> tor 2003-01-30 klockan 01.17 skrev Matt Kraai:
> > This is a bug in anna.
>
> Depends on how you look at it. The archive contains both 2.4.19 and
> 2.4.20 kernel module packages. Should it be fixed in the archive, or
> should anna c
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:21:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#178991: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.005
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 23:29, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: kbd-chooser
> Version: 0.004
> Severity: grave
>
> kbd-chooser segmentation faults when I choose it.
Under what conditions did this occur? (a CDROM install, net-floppy,
make-demo, etc.)
Did you have priority != medium when this occured? I
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.005.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.005.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.005.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.005.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.005_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.005_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 17899
kbd-chooser_0.005_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.005.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.005.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.005_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I decided to check out Upx after finding the folling in
> debian-isntaller/doc/README:
[...]
> I checked, and the version in Sid (1.24) is only able to compress ELF
> binaries. When I tried it on the kernel, it printed this:
>
> # upx tmp/vmlinu
I have no idea if this can/will work out in practice. It's a hack, but
I'm not sure if it's a big ugly hack or a nice, neat hack. ;)
a. Let every udeb with kernel modules provide virtual packages named
after the modules. So if we have the hypothetical package
weird-nic-drivers-udeb with modules fo
tor 2003-01-30 klockan 01.17 skrev Matt Kraai:
> > There seem to be duplicates which only differ in their minor version
> > number, could they be collapsed to one entry somehow perhaps? (Also it
> > would be nice if these were adjacent in the listing so it's easier to
> > spot the duplicates, if yo
20 matches
Mail list logo
