Bug#178557: mklibs: Error out if a _pic.a does not contain an expected symbol

Package: mklibs Version: 0.1.8 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I managed to mis-generate a _pic.a file as an empty archive, which managed to send mklibs into an infinite loop. It'd be nice if mklibs detected when a shared libaries _pic.a did not contain a symbol i

Re: debian-installer bugs page

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 07:56:22PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > Would it be possible to have libdebian-installer on that list too? It's > not a udeb and not in main/debian-installer, but is obviously used for > *building* the installer. Done. (I'm looking at why it still thinks #178073 is open.

Bug#177723: marked as done (main-menu: Loops when debconf priority is high and a package fails)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:47:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#177723: fixed in main-menu 0.023 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#178343: mklibs: Might be related to 178511

Package: mklibs Version: 0.1.8 Followup-For: Bug #178343 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think that typeinfo section in 178511 comes from throw "Some String" I wonder if that's whats going on in this bug, too, somehow? - -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unst

main-menu_0.023_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: main-menu_0.023.dsc to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.023.dsc main-menu_0.023.tar.gz to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.023.tar.gz main-menu_0.023_i386.udeb to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.023_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 177723 Thank you for

Bug#178511: mklibs: Misses some symbols?

Package: mklibs Version: 0.1.8 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is executing against libraries generated by mklibs: # /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi: relocation error: /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi: symbol _ZTIPKc, version GLIBCPP_3.2 no

Re: debian-installer bugs page

sön 2003-01-19 klockan 19.36 skrev Colin Watson: > Actually, forget that, I worked it out. > http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/debian-installer.cgi should do the > job. > > The list works by source package; glibc is included because it has udebs > on some architectures. Would it be possible to ha

HPPA: Boot warning 80F5 (was: Boot warning 80F5.)

Max wrote: > >I have HP 9000/809/k100. Ooo! A K-class. That was big iron in its day. > When my box boot from Debian 3.0r1 hppa CD ( Interact with IPL (Y or > N)?> Y ), i've got message "Cannot find ENTRY TEST Status= -4" and > WARN 80F5 on LCD panel status. What is that means? What do I d

Re: Using the slang frontend for CD installs

[Denis Barbier] >> The select and multiselect dialogs look the same. The selecton >> dialog should look more like a menu, where I can move up and down >> using the arrow keys, and choose using [enter] or [space]. It is >> not intuitive for me having to press [tab] to get to the >> button to con

prebaseconfig_0.021_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: prebaseconfig_0.021.dsc to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.021.dsc prebaseconfig_0.021.tar.gz to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.021.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.021_all.udeb to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.021_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] T

Processing of prebaseconfig_0.021_i386.changes

prebaseconfig_0.021_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: prebaseconfig_0.021.dsc prebaseconfig_0.021.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.021_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Using the slang frontend for CD installs

[Petter Reinholdtsen] > base-installer crashes after downloading some packages. I'm not > sure why, as the screen is blanked almost imediately when this > happen to display the main menu. This did not happen when I tried again. I suspect cdrom-detect managed to detect sarge instead of woody, and

Official testing NetInst cds being weekly built

Hi! I'm happy to announce that we'll be weekly creating netinst cds for testing (the future sarge distribution), this cds are made using Tollef Fog Heen's daily images of the debian-installer, like the full images we are currently building. The images will be accesible by the full ones, this is,

Boot warning 80F5.

Hi, I have HP 9000/809/k100. When my box boot from Debian 3.0r1 hppa CD ( Interact with IPL (Y or N)?> Y ), i've got message "Cannot find ENTRY TEST Status= -4" and WARN 80F5 on LCD panel status. What is that means? What do I do? Where can I find other WARN description ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

rootskel_0.16_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: rootskel_0.16.dsc to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.16.dsc rootskel_0.16.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.16.tar.gz rootskel_0.16_i386.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.16_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- T

Re: Using the slang frontend for CD installs

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:30:21AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I was able to get the cdrom floppy to use the slang frontend just now. > A few modifications was required. I used the CVS version of cdebconf > with the patch from Matt Kraai, a patched mklibs (check #178002 for > the patch)

Processing of rootskel_0.16_i386.changes

rootskel_0.16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_0.16.dsc rootskel_0.16.tar.gz rootskel_0.16_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#178402: cdebconf/slang: do not accept multiple selections with multiselect

I got the following backtrace after installaing and attaching gdb to the running frontend: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x40017c45 in strvacat () from /usr/lib/libdebconf.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0x40017c45 in strvacat () from /usr/lib/libdebconf.so.1 #1 0x000b in ??

Bug#178002: marked as done (mklibs: Fail to handle .so files)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2003 07:47:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178002: fixed in mklibs 0.1.9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

mklibs_0.1.9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mklibs_0.1.9.dsc to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.9.dsc mklibs_0.1.9.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.9.tar.gz mklibs_0.1.9_all.deb to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.9_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 178002 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Processing of mklibs_0.1.9_i386.changes

mklibs_0.1.9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mklibs_0.1.9.dsc mklibs_0.1.9.tar.gz mklibs_0.1.9_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#178402: cdebconf/slang: do not accept multiple selections with multiselect

I redirected stderr in /sbin/debian-installer when it calls debconf (ie /usr/share/debconf/frontend /usr/bin/main-menu 2>> /error.log), and got this output: Segmentation fault shift: 30: can't shift that many postinst exited with status 512 I have no idea yet what this means. -- To UNSU

Re: Should all udeb binaries use UTF8 libraries?

> > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf > > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs > > and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave > > it to the package maintainers? > > I was kind of hoping that we would be

Re: Problems reducing libraries in d-i

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:49:46AM +0800, Jeff Williams wrote: > Still need: di_list_free > Still need: di_pkg_free According to its changelog, these functions were added to libdebian-installer in version 0.10. Which version do you have installed? > Do you still want a copy of the log? No, than