Randolph Chung wrote:
> In reference to a message from Glenn McGrath, dated Nov 18:
> > cdebconf will be a core component of the woody installer, and if
> > cdebconf works the same way as debconf then it needs shell scripts to
> > work from.
> >
> > So the way it is looking we will need a shell t
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: aph 00/11/18 22:01:48
Modified files:
documentation : release-notes.ru.sgml
Log message:
fix SGML tagging errors
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
> Well, my personal opinion (and I have stated it several times in the
> past few months) is that whenever the kernel version is updated, the
> PCMCIA packages should be updated to the LATEST version also. After
> all, it is only fair. I don't want to deal with bug reports swarming
> in that "PC
Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The potato pcmcia package (3.1.20) does not work with the 2.2.18pre
> > kernels. We need to either patch it or use the one from woody. Seems
> > like using the woody one would make more sense at this point...
Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added:
>
At Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:43:46 -0700,
Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The potato pcmcia package (3.1.20) does not work with the 2.2.18pre
> kernels. We need to either patch it or use the one from woody. Seems
> like using the woody one would make more sense at this point...
If we adopt
The potato pcmcia package (3.1.20) does not work with the 2.2.18pre
kernels. We need to either patch it or use the one from woody. Seems
like using the woody one would make more sense at this point...
I'll go ahead and build the potato PCMCIA packages as NMUs so we can at
least test boot-floppies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 40775 [cvs-fixed] unclear wording in Sparc docs
Bug#40775: [slink] unclear wording in Sparc docs
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 49172 [cvs-fixed] problems with floppy booting on sun4c
Bug#49172: [sparc, doc] problems with floppy booting on sun4c
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 17:19:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 16:56:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line tftpboot problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: aph 00/11/18 13:49:13
Modified files:
debian : changelog
Log message:
close two more doc bugs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 16:26:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed due to lack of response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 16:29:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed due to lack of response from submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 67624 [mklibs.sh] mkfs.ext2 does not work on file
Bug#67624: [potato] mkfs.ext2 does not work on file
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Christoph, Joey had sent you a response months ago, with something for
you to test, since we cannot reproduce this problem.
Please execute that test and send us the results. Otherwise, we shall
have to close this bug.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUB
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:50:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Modconf does not locate module list.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:35:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no reponse from user
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
I'm sure the BSD disklabel stuff should be better documented for
alpha. However, this would have to be done by someone familiar with
that, and unfortunetly, I am not. Therefore, some Alpha person or
expert would have to fill this in.
Regarding the image names being incorrect in the installatio
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:32:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sparc tftpboot.img doesn't work on sun4c, root.bin images are missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 56983 syslinux
Bug#56983: [syslinux] Boot failed on Compaq ProSignia
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `syslinux'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debia
reassign 56983 syslinux
thanks
This bug is rather old, so it would be nice if the submitter could
re-test this with more recent disks and determine ift he bug is still
extant.
Anyhow, this would have to be a syslinux bug rather than a
boot-floppies one, so I'm reassigning it, hope that's ok.
-
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:08:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fold german documentation additions back in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:06:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#53565: Install documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Bug#50953 is rather old. Is it fixed in the Potato alpha
boot-floppies? Can we close this bug?
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:02:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line boot-floppies: Documentation errors, Section 5.2, i386 version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:00:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line boot-floppy instructions: Special HD Partitioning for Win2000
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: aph 00/11/18 11:58:14
Modified files:
documentation/en: rescue-boot.sgml
Log message:
sect id="boot-troubleshooting": on sparc, mention the IPX errors
reported by the user (bug#49172); on i386, when repor
In reference to a message from Glenn McGrath, dated Nov 18:
> cdebconf will be a core component of the woody installer, and if
> cdebconf works the same way as debconf then it needs shell scripts to
> work from.
>
> So the way it is looking we will need a shell to be a core component
> wont we ?
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: aph 00/11/18 11:39:21
Modified files:
documentation/en: inst-methods.sgml
Log message:
sect1 id="boot-from-floppies": mention problems with floppy boot on IPX
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: aph 00/11/18 11:20:12
Modified files:
documentation/en: rescue-boot.sgml
Log message:
sect1 id="tftp-images": give an example for SPARC (bug 40775)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Julian Armando Mena Zapata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In ...
> Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 For Intel x86
> Chapter 8 Next Steps and Where to Go From Here
>
> I seen it ...
> ==
> Now, compile the kernel: fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0
> kernel_image. The version
Gleydson Mazioli da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I'm ready for suggestions to make more tests with my native
> language support and solve this problem soon as possible, I hope
> that language chooser will work before the Potato-r1 be released (Is
> this possible?!? :)
No, because 2.
Tim Veazey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to mount / on hda1, /home on hda2, and /usr on hda4. However,
> during the installation step "Mount a Previously-Initialized Partition"
> I can only mount root '/'. For any other directory, it tells me "Mount
> failed: No such file or directory".
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 08:47:29AM -0800, Tim Veazey wrote:
> I'm installing debian on a PC platform (old Pentium 166). During
> installation, I partitioned four spaces.
>
> NameFlags...Part Type...FS Type.Size(MB)
> ---
> hda1.
I'm installing debian on a PC platform (old Pentium 166). During
installation, I partitioned four spaces.
NameFlags...Part Type...FS Type.Size(MB)
---
hda1BootPrimary.Linux ext2..100
hda2Primary..
> Since 2.2.18 isn't out yet I've decided to go with 2.2.18pre21. It
> shouldn't cause us any more griefs than the 2.2.17pre6 that we've got
> at the moment.
>
> They will be on auric soon.
I'm building compact and idepci now and will upload them once they're
done.
randolph
--
Debian Develope
cdebconf will be a core component of the woody installer, and if
cdebconf works the same way as debconf then it needs shell scripts to
work from.
So the way it is looking we will need a shell to be a core component
wont we ?
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Since 2.2.18 isn't out yet I've decided to go with 2.2.18pre21. It
shouldn't cause us any more griefs than the 2.2.17pre6 that we've got
at the moment.
They will be on auric soon.
For the Adam and Brian: be careful with this one because the pre21 is now
in the package name.
--
Debian GNU/Linux
37 matches
Mail list logo
