Glenn McGrath wrote:
> If there is a network
Right, but we're just focusing on a system that has a network to get a
demo system working.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> It may be handy to be able to see the information without using debconf,
> incase something goes wrong with debconf or whatever, just to make it
> more accessable.
Er, you're going to have to stort it in some file somewhere on the
system, in some standard format, with some
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 02:25:11PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > * modules to set up network, partition hard disk, download modules, set
> > up swap, format the disk, install the base system, and set up lilo are
>
Agreed :)
>
> Ive had a look at partitioning with pa
package: ftp.debian.org
I'd like to see a symlink base.tgz -> base#_#.tgz, in all disks-/, in
all dists. This would make it easier to download, without having to know
ahead of time what the numbers will be.
Also, since boot-floppies have been removed from woody(because of Joey's
modular install
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:09:12AM -0500, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:26:31PM +0200, Maciej wrote:
> > But now I have some other problem. My Netscape i Debian 2.2 has very big
> > fonts and icons on task bar and menu bar. I was searching thrugh many files
> > to find a
Randolph Chung wrote:
>
> > * udebconf ??
>
> I was hoping to have gotten some code feedback and/or volunteers to help
> me work on this :-) i will continue to work on this as time permits,
> though i am spread kinda thin atm.
>
I had a superficial look at it, but didnt really come to grips wi
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > For network installs, we could theoretically dispense with IDE and SCSI
> > entirely. This is probably not generally useful, though, since we'd
> > still need to support installing off CD and hard disk.
>
> Nah -- see, once the network is up, sp
> * udpkg is 97% done
I'd say more like 80%, though the rest should be pretty simple to do.
I'll try to get this done by the end of the week.
> * udebconf ??
I was hoping to have gotten some code feedback and/or volunteers to help
me work on this :-) i will continue to work on this as time perm
Joey Hess wrote:
> * main-menu is 90% done, and will be finished by the end of this week
> * udpkg is 97% done
> * udebconf ??
Randolph has started this,
http://auric.debian.org/~tausq/cdebconf-0.10.tgz
> * modules to set up network, partition hard disk, download modules, set
> up swap, form
Title: debian-boot´Ô ¾È³çÇϽʴϱî?
debian-boot´Ô ¾È³çÇϽʴϱî?debian-boot´ÔÀÇ Á¤º¸´Â http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ix/maintainers.htmlÀÇ [EMAIL PROTECTED]ÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏ
Á¤º¸¸¦ Âü°í Çß½À´Ï´Ù.ºÒÆíÀ» µå·È´Ù¸é Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¾È³çÇϽʴϱî? ´ëüÀÇÇÐ ±³½Ç( http://www.sarm.co.kr )¿î¿µÀÚÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ±ÛÀº
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > For the installer we could share information of detected hardware via
> > debconf, but i guess it should be stored on the filesystem somewhere.
>
> Why? I don't see anything wrong with just storing it in the debconf db.
>
It may be handy to be able
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> For network installs, we could theoretically dispense with IDE and SCSI
> entirely. This is probably not generally useful, though, since we'd
> still need to support installing off CD and hard disk.
Nah -- see, once the network is up, space constraints pretty much
dis
Vaidhyanathan Mayilrangam wrote:
> I met with joeyh during ALS and offered to work on kernel for the boot floppies.
> I got the kernel down to 355 KB.. From what I understood from joeyh, the new
> installer will be just the kernel and the network drivers.. However, one of the
> issues I have is t
Anthony Towns wrote:
> I don't really understand task packages. I'd assume that they're there
> to make it easy for people to do some particular common tasks (setup a
> desktop environment, interact with your computer in japanese, play music,
> do 3d graphics, program).
Right. Have you done a pot
Randolph Chung wrote:
> When we were working on potato boot-floppies, it was my understanding
> that potato freeze != boot-floppies freeze. Several important additions
> (http-fetch, etc) went in after the freeze. If this is the case for
> woody as well, then we should find out from ajt when he th
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Talking to the release manager, Anthony Towns, in IRC, I learned it is
> his current plan to freeze woody early in January 2001.
>
> I think this is a laudable goal, but unfortunately I think that means
> we need to retain the boot-floppies for woody.
I'm afraid that I agre
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> For the installer we could share information of detected hardware via
> debconf, but i guess it should be stored on the filesystem somewhere.
Why? I don't see anything wrong with just storing it in the debconf db.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Vaidhyanathan Mayilrangam wrote:
> I wonder if we would be having bzip2 or gzip on the boot floppies.. All the
> network modules compiled takes about 1.3M, but compresssed with bzip2 , needs
> only 435K.. The size of bzip2 + libbz2.so is about 85K.. We can probably do the
> same with the initrd im
I would like to see the busybox package in the main debian archive.
Busxybox is a multicall binary that is targeted at embedded systems, it
is the basis of the debian installer.
A busybox package was previously rejected because it was uninstable on
an existing system. This was because busybox wou
I am a little worried about how we are going to handle all the kernel
modules required for installing.
Where are all the ide, scsi and net drivers going to reisde ?
The user will need drivers to suit the fetch method on the actual boot
media, that way they can fetch other install or kernel modul
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 05:58:09PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> IIRC modconf just calls modprobe, so if you have a 2.4-kernel-compatible
> modprobe/modutils it will work fine.
>
> I'm not sure this is really a modconf bug, but I'll leave it open for
> now.
I'm talking about the interactive ncu
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:26:31PM +0200, Maciej wrote:
> But now I have some other problem. My Netscape i Debian 2.2 has very big
> fonts and icons on task bar and menu bar. I was searching thrugh many files
> to find a solution but failed. Maybe U will help me .
Sounds if you are using 100d
Without knowing any of the background, I find it pretty scary that this got
into production in the first place. I hope there's not much stuff about
that's using this.
Tim Anderson
-Original Message-
From: Nick Holgate [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue Oct 17, 2000 at 02:51:09PM +0100, Nick Holgate wrote:
>
> I have just spent couple of hours tracking down a problem with a minor patch
> I made to the boot-floppies sources. It turns out that I made the assumption
> that the macro FALSE would be defined as 0, when in fact dbootstrap.h
> de
> > +#define FALSE ((int) 1)
> > +#define TRUE((int) 0)
>
> This is contrary to usual logic which says that
>
> if (3>2) {
> whatever
> }
Yes, I'm quite aware this is "contrary to usual logic" that's why I
posted in the first place.
> Why not change the "wrong" definitions of TRUE a
Thanks anywayBut now I have some other problem. My Netscape i
Debian 2.2 has very bigfonts and icons on task bar and menu bar. I was
searching thrugh many filesto find a solution but failed. Maybe U will help
me .P.S. If you got 2 mails from different persons thst was my
fault, please a
Nick Holgate wrote:
> +#define FALSE ((int) 1)
> +#define TRUE((int) 0)
This is contrary to usual logic which says that
if (3>2) {
whatever
}
and
if (TRUE) {
whatever
}
should be the equivalent things.
Why not change the "wrong" definitions of TRUE and FALSE in whatever place
th
I have just spent couple of hours tracking down a problem with a minor patch
I made to the boot-floppies sources. It turns out that I made the assumption
that the macro FALSE would be defined as 0, when in fact dbootstrap.h
defines it as ((int) 1) and the corresponding TRUE definition as ((int) 0
-Os defaults to -O2 when I compile for i386 with math-emulation on..
Regards,
Vaidhy
> What about compiling the kernel with -Os instead of the default -O2, i
> did some compiles and on a small kernel with nothing it made it 3KB
> smaller, on my regular kernel which is 946KB it reduced it to 930
VOTRE TEMPS EST PRECIEUX ! Alors permettez nous D'ETRE DIRECTS !
CONSOMMATEUR, CREATEUR, DISTRIBUTEUR
Une question se pose toujours : OU TROUVER mes PARTENAIRES, des IDEES, des INNOVATIONS
???
Pour faire la course en tête: Un site GENIAL est NE!
* Son Nom : Village des nouveautés.co
30 matches
Mail list logo
