Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would prefer using a busybox package. Otherwise, I will again end
> > up with the painful task of keeping two CVS trees in sync... The
> > busybox package has been ready to upload for months, but thus far
> > noone has
Your message dated 15 Oct 2000 01:51:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#74346: MB-CPU trouble
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> [I'm re-sending this due to the subject line damage -- this is a very
> important issue.]
>
> Talking to the release manager, Anthony Towns, in IRC, I learned it is
> his current plan to freeze woody early in January 2001.
>
> I think this is a laudable goal, but unfor
"Maciej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded into RAM disk and press ENTER.
>
> When I pressed Enter i got another messages saying:
>
> Floppy0: perpendicular mode not supported by this FDC
I dunno -- this is some sort of wierd kernel thing. Sorry, can't
re
"George M. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thought I would give you and update. Finally I had to reinstall
> Debian becuase when I tried to configure XWindows it would not
> activate the mouse and so I would find myself in XWindows and no way
> to bring up a terminal window.
If you have
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Go ahead and do what you have to do.
> I am waiting for the build to finish, before I commit that patch. I hope
> that is before I leave from Oldenburg... otherwise you might miss your
> sunday evening target.
Ok.
I'll announce here when I
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would prefer using a busybox package. Otherwise, I will again end
> up with the painful task of keeping two CVS trees in sync... The
> busybox package has been ready to upload for months, but thus far
> noone has pursued getting the new "installer"
[I'm re-sending this due to the subject line damage -- this is a very
important issue.]
Talking to the release manager, Anthony Towns, in IRC, I learned it is
his current plan to freeze woody early in January 2001.
I think this is a laudable goal, but unfortunately I think that means
we need
"Dave Williams @ Home" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two problems to mention:
> Firstly:- 2.2.16 boot-floppies and vanilla rescue/root image from latest
> potato disk image (reported as Linux 2.2.17 from Kernel-image-
> 2.2.17-2.2.17pre6-1) cannot make a boot floppy.
>
> I've tracked the proble
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:52:39PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any more surprises like this?
>
> I don't know -- you're the porter.
Very funny, _somebody_ changed the behaviour of parsefile and I haven't seen
any note of this on the l
Based on my take on the language chooser discussions here, we are
going to have to target language chooser for 2.2r2, assuming that
2.2r1 comes out in the next week or so. I just feel like making the
language chooser mainstream ATM would be a big risk. I can't think of
a single party (except pe
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, there is a problem:
> Your m68k architecture is not supported yet.
>
> I guess it comes from utilities/dbootstrap/main.c, which has been changed a
> little since the potato bf.
>
> Maybe its sufficient to patch *get_m68k_model( void
Sorry -- had some problems with Emacs message.el configuration. It
was fudging my headers. I hope it's fixed now.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:14:19AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > I checked it out, will try a build, Ill tell you the results tomorrow.
>
> Please do. I plan on uploading 2.2.18 source pkg on Sunday.
Build finished: http://pandora.debian.org/~cts/bf/
m68k patch checked in.
However, there is
I wrote:
> Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate
> packages is a good idea or not. Thanks!
>
> This comes to my mind because:
>
> 1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into woody (c.f. Adam)
> 2) Packages like mkinitrd-cd depends on boot-floppies solely f
On Fri Oct 13, 2000 at 11:14:14PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Talking to the release manager, Anthony Towns, in IRC, I learned it is
> his current plan to freeze woody early in January 2001.
>
> I think this is a laudable goal, but unfortunately I think that means
> we need to retain the boo
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:22:24PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Ah! Now I know what he means. The problem is that the file stays in the
> 'release' directory after the tarballs are created.
Exactly.
> > I think it has to be added to $rootfiles (for m68k), then it should be
> > handled like REA
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:11:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:14:19AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> > Moreover, that dh_installdocs is run within arch-indep, so what would
> > that have to do with the m68k build?
> It built fine, however the changes file sa
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:14:19AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Moreover, that dh_installdocs is run within arch-indep, so what would
> that have to do with the m68k build?
It built fine, however the changes file says:
Files:
32a58ad155965f636dd8000a898828fe 4283 byhand - READ-pl.txt
7a25880a
19 matches
Mail list logo
