Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:50:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Bug report logs - #62085
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
> Package: boot-floppy
> Version: 2.2.15
> Severity: critical
>
>
> I'm trying to install Potato on a Proliant 400 with a Smart Array RAID
> 211 card.
>
> At boot, the Potato CD do not see the card.
>
> The server is equiped with 3 disks using RAID 5. No disk on the
> motherboard SCSI port. Th
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've fixed Bug#67082 and wonder if I may commit the code. I've
> > decided to really fix it and get back the old behaviour instead of
> > just editing the message text (which would affect all translators to
> > fix their tex
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > How would you actually handle those dependencies though? Presumably you
> > don't have a udselect that'll automatically find any debs that anything
> > depends on, nor a uapt to do just automatically install them; you don't
> > gu
> How would you actually handle those dependencies though? Presumably you
> don't have a udselect that'll automatically find any debs that anything
> depends on, nor a uapt to do just automatically install them; you don't
> guarantee any ordering so running udpkg -i foo.deb bar.deb won't bother
>
First off, a bit hats off to the new debian 2.2r0 installation. Within 20
minutes I was up and running a telnet session to fetch my mail.
However, I'm still very unwise in the arts of making things work and I could
use a pointer or two.
(read I'm a newbie)
I am trying to install the X window sys
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've fixed Bug#67082 and wonder if I may commit the code. I've
> decided to really fix it and get back the old behaviour instead of
> just editing the message text (which would affect all translators to
> fix their text as well).
>
> What I've done t
We're still actively working on i18n'd Potato boot-floppies, although
I wish the work went quicker.
Have you updated the Swedish release notes and install manual? That's
useful even w/o i18n'd boot-floppies.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Josip, you fielding this? It seems the release notes and
releases/potato should mention this.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated 22 Aug 2000 22:50:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#69157: boot-floppies: boot-floppy creation fails on PowerPC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated 22 Aug 2000 22:52:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#69154: boot-floppies: simplify Debian mirror selection
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Fixed the phrasing.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the package pdisk is in? We need to refile this bug against
that package, although I doubt it's fixable.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, fixed in CVS.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. I'll try helping with the 'i18n' flavor. Can we delay 2.2r1 release
> until it's ready?
I think so. What else remains?
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated 22 Aug 2000 22:48:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
"Conrad Delbert Seaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having trouble getting lilo to boot the system I have, there
> seems to be a gap in the doc's. My system looks as follows.
>
> 1 20 gig disk
>
> 50% Disk C: (first partition) Windows2000(NT5)/Windows98 (this boots using the NT
>loade
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We wanted to freeze potato last year but had no working boot-floppies
> handy. Only very few people have worked on it.
This is partially true but not quite true. I hope I don't sound
defensive, but it's my opinion that bf on its own was not a major
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> My current thinking is to break out the release notes and the install
> manual as two separate pacakges and separate CVS areas of the
> debian-doc CVSROOT. I hadn't really planned on doing this in the
> context of boot-floppies though, but rather when that is obsoleted by
>
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:46:54PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Mathias Wiklander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have problem booting a SS1 and a SS2 with the Debain 2.2 Sparc CD. It
> > boots and when it want to start init it says that "Default console not
> > found" or something like that
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be better for Josip and Adam or whoever
> > to simply make a release-notes.deb that they maintain independently
> > of boot-floppies and that's easily buildable (since we have a definite
> > .tar.gz with Build-D
David Gast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The version on the floppy I am using says `Rescue 2.2 0714'
>
> If I try something like
>
> boot: resue root=/dev/hda2 debug
>
> I get an error message
>
> SCSI: Detection failed (no card)
That is normal if you don't have a Future Domain SCSI card
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "WARNING: This Document is in Testing". This paragraph says that it is
> an "early, prerelease version". Now that potato has been released,
> should this perhaps be rephrased?
Aye, probably rephrased. I still think the documentation has serious
problem
Your message dated 22 Aug 2000 22:03:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line there should be some statically linked tar at installtime
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated 22 Aug 2000 21:32:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FW: Toshiba Laptop Install Doesn't Get Beyond First Boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68716 [slink, i386] problem booting no-name AMD
Bug#68716: problems booting the install
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
> Package: boot-CDRom
Should have said "boot-floppies", even if you were booting from
CD-ROM. Sorry for the unintuitive name.
> Version: "Official" Debian 2.1, the 4 disk version.
> architecture: x86 Family 5 Model 8 Stepping 12, AuthenticAMD
> model: no name
> memory:64M
> s
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I choose "make linux directly bootable from hard disk"
> >
> > Then a dialog box says my disk is factory clean.
> > Then a dialog box asks for an MBR. I answer no
> ^^
>
> I guess I simply don't underst
Mathias Wiklander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have problem booting a SS1 and a SS2 with the Debain 2.2 Sparc CD. It
> boots and when it want to start init it says that "Default console not
> found" or something like that.
I'm not sure. I've CC'd the sparc user base. Please let us know if
t
Benjamin Constant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm searching for complete documentation about boot-floppies scripts,
> clear documentation about the differents parts and functions used in the
> scripts...
Aren't we all. I'm afraid such documentation doesn't exist. But
there is the top-level R
On Mon Aug 21, 2000 at 11:25:55PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > unlike dpkg, dpkg-deb can quite easily be written as a shell script.
>
> I wrote most of it as a shell script, but I cannot find a way to parse
> control file entries w/o using external shell commands, which is
> something of a no-n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 67794 boot-floppies
Bug#67794: FW: Toshiba Laptop Install Doesn't Get Beyond First Boot
Bug reassigned from package `slink' to `boot-floppies'.
> reassign 68438 kernel
Bug#68438: an Oops in the kernel 2.2.14 (using fsck.ext2 on a zip disk) (f
Hi,
I'm searching for complete documentation about boot-floppies scripts,
clear documentation about the differents parts and functions used in the
scripts...
Thanks in advance
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 64613 [unreproducable] boot-floppies: Only got one CD drive but system
>claims I have multiple
Bug#64613: boot-floppies: Only got one CD drive but system claims I have multiple
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 09:10:57PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> > Doing depends will cetainly be too nasty for a shell scriot, so if we really
> > want to include depends, then I agree that doing udpkg in C is the way
> > to go.
> Yes, we really do need depends. As Randolph say
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 2.2.13-2000-05-04
> Severity: critical
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I have a disk ``factory clean'' with no MBR.
> No primary partition on the disk, only logical. / = /dev/hda6
> I plan to install LILO on the MBR. The install procedure will not let me
> do that, It give
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:26:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line said to be done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:52:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, I generally mean all i18ned floppies, but Polish version is a little
> > bit special in that docs don't build in potato.
>
> If you look at previous posts I've done the ground
I have problem booting a SS1 and a SS2 with the Debain 2.2 Sparc CD. It
boots and when it want to start init it says that "Default console not
found" or something like that.
/Mathias
Mathias Wiklander Frontpartner AB
Chalottenbergsvägen 6 0322-9 34 00
441 43 ALINGSÅS 070-931 24 08
[
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> I don't know, what XF 4 does with unknown cards.
> XF 3 somethime bahaves ungly: It just detects some other
> card and screw up everything, so that even the text-console is
> unreadable.
XF 4 generally gets you some plain vga driver working in a really low
resolution an
> So, this means we have a process like:
>
> try to XF 4 autodetect
> if fail
> try to XF 3 autodetect
> if fail
> punt?
>
I don't know, what XF 4 does with unknown cards.
XF 3 somethime bahaves ungly: It just detects some other
card and screw up everything, so that even t
41 matches
Mail list logo
