On Sun Aug 13, 2000 at 11:30:47PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If we don't provide the devices, we should create them online, that
> > would be a feasable solution for me. Or alternatively we have to
> > remove the drivers that make use of them..
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Forgot about that. Well, I don't consider it release critical but
> since everybody will see it, it will give a very bad impression of
> Debian, they can't even create boot-floppies.
>From source? Eh? What bug# is this?
> When do you plan to relea
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > BTW, I worry about all the new devices you just added. Are you sure
> > we didn't just make the rootdisk too large for powerpc? Didn't exceed
> > our
>
> I don't know. (your sentence broke there somehow...)
Um, the root d
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 06:08:02PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> William Cordis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a SPARCstation 5 that I'm trying to install debian on. I downloaded
> > the 2.2.16-2000-07-14 disks from /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-sparc/sun4cdm
> > and the root.bin that
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've been told that Adam plans a new release. I highly appreciate
> > that since the 'cant find /lib/modules/2.2.16/modules.dep file' error
> > gives a really bad idea of what Debian is doing.
>
> Yeah -- it's not release c
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've been told that Adam plans a new release. I highly appreciate
> > that since the 'cant find /lib/modules/2.2.16/modules.dep file' error
> > gives a really bad idea of what Debian is doing.
>
> Yeah -- it's not release c
Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since everoby seems happy with my patch (that you can find at
> http://www.debian.org/~gemorin/boot), I'd like to commit it to the CVS.
> I've seen that there is a lot of branches. Should I create a new branch
> or commit it in an existing one ?
William Cordis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a SPARCstation 5 that I'm trying to install debian on. I downloaded
> the 2.2.16-2000-07-14 disks from /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-sparc/sun4cdm
> and the root.bin that I used came from
> debian/dists/potato/main/disks-sparc/images-1.44
>
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 07:01:38PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Hmm. This isn't a boot-floppies bug. It's either a bug in the
> individual packages you mentioned (i.e., missing deps) or else an apt
> bug.
I guess so. Maybe some chroot environment could be used to track potential
dependancy is
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and stopped
> I've never seen that.
This is just the unix.o loop. It's a harmless warning. We used to use a
patch which didn't print out a warning, but now a new patch has been
integrated into the upstream k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68911 [fixed in CVS] dbootstrap.h missing
Bug#68911: Should not include dbootstrap.h in .cvsignore
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
retitle 68911 [fixed in CVS] dbootstrap.h missing
thanks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The file utilities/dbootstrap/dbootstrap.h is missing from the source
> package.
Thanks. Fixed that. Bad craziness.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Joey, you just exceeded the root disk, as I suspected you might. I'm
a little suprised because I thought the i386 root disk had plenty of
room. Anyhow, please test it and fix that.
Did you also conditionalize any new devices so they are i386 only?
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Per request of Adam I've uploaded for potato the version of debiandoc-sgml that went
> already into woody. This version provides Polish locale support (and fixes some
>other
> problems as well) which is needed for the boot floppies related docu
Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order
> > > to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes
> >
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is the proper list, I'm forwarding.
> > Are there any fixes (or even diagnoses) yet for the following problem?
> > Has anyone else even seen these symptoms?
> > Earlier I reported a problem with installing potato (from scratch)
> > and getting e
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been told that Adam plans a new release. I highly appreciate
> that since the 'cant find /lib/modules/2.2.16/modules.dep file' error
> gives a really bad idea of what Debian is doing.
Yeah -- it's not release critical is it? Because 2.2.17 woul
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order
> > to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes
> > (assuming they are otherwise ok), correct?
>
> For
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, wrong bug title :) It left my directory tree when I imported it into
> CVS and unfortunately the .cvsignore file has "dbootstrap*" in it.
Ok, fixed in cvs sources.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> retitle 68900 [CVS-fixed] Misterious boot-floppies error
> thanks
>
> I've fixed this bug (and related) and committed it to the CVS
> repository.
It's nice to retitle but please do the right thing and add entries
with the proper (closes: Bug#X) i
Well, unless someone turns the problems listed into bug reports,
theres absolutely no chance it will ever get fixed.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68659 [CVS-fixed] root disk filesystem shouldn't use new ext2 extensions
Bug#68659: root disk filesystem shouldn't use new ext2 extensions
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68517 [CVS-fixed] Not enough RAID ida devices
Bug#68517: [compact] not enough RAID ida devices
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68665 [CVS-fixed] Missing devices in base system
Bug#68665: Please add devices
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68900 [CVS-fixed] Misterious boot-floppies error
Bug#68900: Misterious boot-floppies error
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
retitle 68900 [CVS-fixed] Misterious boot-floppies error
thanks
I've fixed this bug (and related) and committed it to the CVS
repository.
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
retitle 68665 [CVS-fixed] Missing devices in base system
thanks
I've worked on the boot-floppies code recently...
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 2.2.16-2000-07-14
>
> When people select one out of a couple of non-ATA-CD-ROMs they'll
> run into an error, resulting in b
retitle 68517 [CVS-fixed] Not enough RAID ida devices
thanks
> Installing on a Compaq DL380 with onboard RAID controller and PCI
> Smart Array 221 card the compact set is required (requisite support for
> RAID + onboard ethernet does not appear top be in the standard set).
>
> However, the file
Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2000 14:34:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line modconf or not?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68872 [can't reproduce] Modconf does not locate module list.
Bug#68872: Modconf does not locate module list.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debia
> I have reinstalled the system but this time when initializing the root
> partirtion I chose compatibility with 2.0 kernels. This time the installation
> proceeded swiftly, and the modules list appeared in the Configure Driver
> modules phase.
FWIW: I am unable to reproduce this.
Regards,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 68911 Should not include dbootstrap.h in .cvsignore
Bug#68911: boot-floppies: dbootstrap.h missing
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> reopen 68911
Bug#68911: Should not include dbootstrap.h in .cvsignore
B
retitle 68911 Should not include dbootstrap.h in .cvsignore
reopen 68911
quit
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 07:04:19AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> Prove:
>
> auric!joey(pts):~> tar tvfz
>/org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/dists/potato/main/source/admin/boot-floppies_2.2.16.tar.gz|grep
> dboot
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:27:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > The filesystem image on the root disk (root.bin) shouldn't
> > use ext2 extensions that are incompatible with 2.0.x kernels.
> >
> > The current image uses those extensions, making it impossible to
> > modify the filesystem with
Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:49:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dbootstrap.h not missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Le 2000-08-13 13:27:38 +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait :
> > The filesystem image on the root disk (root.bin) shouldn't
> > use ext2 extensions that are incompatible with 2.0.x kernels.
> >
> > The current image uses those extensions, making it impossible to
> > modify the filesystem with a slink
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:53:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> Thanks. Can you give me some mor information?
> I'll add that.
>From mke2fs(8):
-O feature[,...]
Create the filesystem with the listed set of
features (filesystem options).The
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the current code I see how it is created:
>
> > mke2fs -F -q -N $inodes -m 0 $floppy
>
> > -F is force even for odd geometry
> > -q is quiet
> > -N looks like it sets the number of inodes or the inode/
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looking at the current code I see how it is created:
> mke2fs -F -q -N $inodes -m 0 $floppy
> -F is force even for odd geometry
> -q is quiet
> -N looks like it sets the number of inodes or the inode/byte ratio
> -m sets the reserved-
> The filesystem image on the root disk (root.bin) shouldn't
> use ext2 extensions that are incompatible with 2.0.x kernels.
>
> The current image uses those extensions, making it impossible to
> modify the filesystem with a slink system.
>
> (I'm trying to see some error message that are quickl
Chris Rutter wrote:
> I have a fairly wacky proposal which concerns, mainly, boot-floppies on
> Linux/ARM. I've attached the proposal here; it should actually of generic
> relevance, but I'm only working on ARM for the time being. If anyone had
> any comments I'd be hugely hugely greatful. If n
Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> As I understand it, we need the woody debiandoc-sgml pakcage in order
> to build Russian and Polish installation manual and release notes
> (assuming they are otherwise ok), correct?
For Polish yes, for Russian I'm not aware of any changes made since
I've been told that Adam plans a new release. I highly appreciate
that since the 'cant find /lib/modules/2.2.16/modules.dep file' error
gives a really bad idea of what Debian is doing.
Wrt other stuff, what is high on your priority list that needs to
be fixed? I'd like to help. At the moment I
This is the proper list, I'm forwarding.
Daniel Barclay wrote:
>
> Are there any fixes (or even diagnoses) yet for the following problem?
> Has anyone else even seen these symptoms?
>
>
>
> Earlier I reported a problem with installing potato (from scratch)
> and getting errors at boot time li
44 matches
Mail list logo
