On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:18:41AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:43:22AM -0400, Stephen Pinker wrote:
> > Not able to cross-compile?
>
> Many packages won't cross compile due to using autoconf which is
> braindead when it comes to allowing cross compiling.
>
> Removi
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:40:59AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On the contrary, autoconf makes many things consistent and predictable
> when cross compiling, and improvements to autoconf and other tools have
> made the possibility of cross compiling much more likely for a given
> package. You're
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:43:22AM -0400, Stephen Pinker wrote:
> > Not able to cross-compile?
>
> Many packages won't cross compile due to using autoconf which is
> braindead when it comes to allowing cross co
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:43:22AM -0400, Stephen Pinker wrote:
> Not able to cross-compile?
Many packages won't cross compile due to using autoconf which is
braindead when it comes to allowing cross compiling.
Removing the extra ';' from thunderbird allows the package to build.
Still waiting for
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:34:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
Thanks, I figured this out on my own. Anyway, I asked if someone can
ensure that this is the only problem left.
I can try compiling it here, but it may take a few days. Arm machines
are not that fast in
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:24PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Alexander Sack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > before I start doing trial and error uploads, wasting lots of buildd
> > time, could you help us and sort out what patches
> > are needed in order to fix the FTBFS for mo
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:58:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > before I start doing trial and error uploads, wasting lots of buildd
> > time, could you help us and sort out what patches
> > are needed in order to fix the FTBFS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> Someone just made a typo it would appear and certainly didn't do even
> the slightest checking to see if the syntax was still valid.
I believe this was because of a mistake made by the maintainers to
implement
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:34:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Thanks, I figured this out on my own. Anyway, I asked if someone can
> ensure that this is the only problem left.
I can try compiling it here, but it may take a few days. Arm machines
are not that fast in general (mine is 400mhz).
* Alexander Sack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> before I start doing trial and error uploads, wasting lots of buildd
> time, could you help us and sort out what patches
> are needed in order to fix the FTBFS for mozilla-thunderbird
> (1.0.7-1) and mozilla-firefox (dito), please?
Well th
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> before I start doing trial and error uploads, wasting lots of buildd
> time, could you help us and sort out what patches
> are needed in order to fix the FTBFS for mozilla-thunderbird
> (1.0.7-1) and mozilla-firefox (dito), please?
Hi all,
before I start doing trial and error uploads, wasting lots of buildd
time, could you help us and sort out what patches
are needed in order to fix the FTBFS for mozilla-thunderbird
(1.0.7-1) and mozilla-firefox (dito), please?
Thanks,
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/
12 matches
Mail list logo
