Re: [bigloo] Re: Bigloo on Linux/ARM

2004-06-18 Thread Yann Dirson
Hi, I've finally managed to build a 2.6d bdb with full debug symbols, but when I run it, no code seem to be executed, the segfault occurs before _start, as is confirmed by "ldd -r": $ ldd -r ./bin/bdb libbigloobdl_s-2.6d.so => /home/ydirson/bigloo-2.6d-32-O1-g/lib/2

Re: Bigloo on Linux/ARM

2004-06-03 Thread Yann Dirson
imisation; the 2nd one rules out possible problems impacting the scheme->C part of the bigloo compiler's job. Unless I miss something, that leaves us with the following possibilities: - problem in the bigloo executable after C generation (I don't know enough here to rule out this possibility

Bigloo on Linux/ARM

2004-06-01 Thread Yann Dirson
Some time ago we found out that bigloo needed to be built with 'gcc -O2' on ARM platforms, when using gcc-3.3, since with -O3 some failure occured when building bdb. Moreover that bug appeared to be fixed in gcc-3.4, and gcc-2.95 is not able to build bigloo correctly either. But f

Re: [bigloo] Re: beta2.6d

2004-04-01 Thread Yann Dirson
[Context for debian-arm: bigloo FTBFS on ARM] On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:53:29PM +0200, Manuel Serrano wrote: > > Hm. Was that problem intoduced by an update of the GC, or is it an existing > > one that only triggers right now ? 2.6c did build on this platform... > > 2.6d

bigloo

2001-02-10 Thread Philip Blundell
This package Build-Depends on itself, which obviously stops the autobuilder making much headway. Could someone investigate what's needed to make it compile? p.