On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:34:36AM +0200, I wrote:
> I'll try to build at -O0, and then at -O1 if -O0 worked, and will let you
> know. I should also have a closer look at how gcc-3.2 performs, but that
> would be a pain to have to use it, since it's supposed to be phased out from
> Debian...
Here is my status of the issue:
- the problem still exists with "gcc-3.3 -O0"
- a diff of an ARM build tree against an i386 one shows no difference
(appart from comments and strings showing setup information)
The 1st point rules out a possible bug in a gcc optimisation; the 2nd one
rules out possible problems impacting the scheme->C part of the bigloo
compiler's job.
Unless I miss something, that leaves us with the following possibilities:
- problem in the bigloo executable after C generation (I don't know enough
here to rule out this possibility, but intuitively I don't give it much
weight)
- generated C code has arm-specific portability issues - Philip mentionned
structure alignment as a common problem
- gcc-3.[34] at least has a non-optim-related arm-specific bug
Next step: I've launched a build with --cflags=-g --coflags=-O1 and will try
to pinpoint the precise problem. Stay tuned.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
