On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Wookey wrote:
>> months of work down the toilet, so that the next person who wants to
>> do an architecture port has to, once again, spend months of their time
>> repeating the process.
>
> Don't panic. It's not quite that bad.
whew.
> We are working on bootstra
On Monday 07 February 2011 19:51:03 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Konstantinos,
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> > * Now that squeeze has been released, I plan to increase the severity of
> > all armhf-related bug reports to at least "serious".
>
> Sorry
Hi Konstantinos,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> * Now that squeeze has been released, I plan to increase the severity of all
> armhf-related bug reports to at least "serious".
Sorry, but that's not an appropriate severity to set for bugs related to
n
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2011-02-07 14:19 +]:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis
> wrote:
>
> > Heh, I read that mail before but I forgot to reply.
>
> :)
>
> > Basically, there is no
> > such record. Porting involved lots and lots of hacks, porting debian
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> (removing a few people from the list)
> You're underestimating the value an automated system has,
no... i don't believe i am. the automated system itself is not the
important bit. the record of what changes/differences required
(removing a few people from the list)
On Monday 07 February 2011 16:19:52 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ahh f***, f***, f*** and f***-it some more. that's *exactly* the
> information which needed to be recorded, and placed into an automated
> system. so the opportunity has been complete
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> Heh, I read that mail before but I forgot to reply.
:)
> Basically, there is no
> such record. Porting involved lots and lots of hacks, porting debian to a new
> architecture is certainly not straightforward or "friendly" proces
Hi,
kudos for all your work on armhf!
On Montag, 7. Februar 2011, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> * Now that squeeze has been released, I plan to increase the severity of
> all armhf-related bug reports to at least "serious".
IMO you should discuss this on -devel. Or am I missing something obvi
Hello,
2011/2/7 Konstantinos Margaritis :
> * basically mass-bug filing has been mostly done -as you can see in [1],[2]
> some packages do remain, but bugs have not been filed as there is no clear
> solution, eg binutils or lintian or ruby1.x until the issue with the gnu
> triplet/quad has been f
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:15:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 February 2011 14:55:19 Hector Oron wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Wookey and I have prepared a last minute talk to explain later
> >> sta
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> On Sunday 06 February 2011 14:55:19 Hector Oron wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Wookey and I have prepared a last minute talk to explain later
>> status on Debian ARM, a bit of history and future plans.
>>
>> If you have not been able to
On Sunday 06 February 2011 14:55:19 Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wookey and I have prepared a last minute talk to explain later
> status on Debian ARM, a bit of history and future plans.
>
> If you have not been able to attend to it, you might find the talk slides
> at: http://people.debia
12 matches
Mail list logo
