On Monday 07 February 2011 19:51:03 Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Konstantinos, > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > > * Now that squeeze has been released, I plan to increase the severity of > > all armhf-related bug reports to at least "serious". > > Sorry, but that's not an appropriate severity to set for bugs related to > not-yet-ported software. These should be set to 'important' instead. If > you're concerned about setting the bug severity mainly in order to lower > the threshold for NMUing, please consult the release team to ask about > getting this considered a release goal for wheezy. > > (Note, however, that historically porters have been given a very free hand > with shorter-than-usual waiting periods for NMUs. I think you will find > your reception among maintainers *better* if you file these bugs at > important and NMU for them, than if you bump them to serious. :)
Point taken, I will wait a few days, as some bugs have started to get fixed already and then I'll do as you suggested. As for getting armhf considered for wheezy, well that can considered a given - otherwise, why go to all this trouble :) I haven't sent any email to the release team as I am following the Archive Criteria [1] rules, some of them are already fulfilled, but some aren't (eg. 3 official porters, or fully working installer). Once all these were fulfilled, I would send an email, officially asking for inclusion. Regards Konstantinos [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/archive-criteria.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201102072025.08994.mar...@genesi-usa.com
