* Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-14 15:23]:
> Just a random question, but what is the average build time for a
> generic kernel package for the current debian armel build system?
Looking at buildd.debian.org it seems a typical kernel build (with 4
images) takes between 40:25:01 and 43:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:01:42PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 09:37]:
> > Could we build only a package with the source in the main kernel and
> > have binary packages generated by other source packages
> > build-depending on the source? This wou
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yuck, I don't really like this idea.
>
> Let's hope Marvell's fast development board will help...
> --
Just a random question, but what is the average build time for a
generic kernel package for the current debian arm
* Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 09:37]:
> Could we build only a package with the source in the main kernel and
> have binary packages generated by other source packages
> build-depending on the source? This would allow building multiple
> arm flavours in parallel and we wouldn't have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:22:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>> I actually read about the new Gumstix in LWN today which is also OMAP
>> based. The Gumstix and Beagleboard definitely sound interesting.
>> Maybe we can
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:22:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I actually read about the new Gumstix in LWN today which is also OMAP
> based. The Gumstix and Beagleboard definitely sound interesting.
> Maybe we can TI to donate some.
It'd be good, yes. Though at the price of the beagleboar
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 13:00]:
> > too long to build. So you'd have to come up with a good argument
> > as to why we should add an OMAP kernel (e.g. how many users are
> > there going to be; which devices use such a CPU, etc).
>
> The Beagleboard and other platforms derived
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:31:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> too long to build. So you'd have to come up with a good argument as
> to why we should add an OMAP kernel (e.g. how many users are there
> going to be; which devices use such a CPU, etc).
The Beagleboard and other platforms deri
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> The fundamental problem we have on arm is that we have to restrict the
> number of kernels we build because otherwise the kernel package takes
> too long to build. So you'd have to come up with a good argument as
> to why we should add an OMAP kernel
* Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 18:16]:
> Should have worded the question differently, how can i add a kernel
> deb to make it easier for end users to use this device with debian.
You could make an apt repository with the kernel and then pass an
argument to debian-installer so that
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 10:46]:
>> Which reminds me, it's too late for lenny, but what's the best way to
>> get this board's kernel added to lenny+1?
>
> The fundamental problem we have on arm is
* Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 10:46]:
> Which reminds me, it's too late for lenny, but what's the best way to
> get this board's kernel added to lenny+1?
The fundamental problem we have on arm is that we have to restrict the
number of kernels we build because otherwise the kernel
* John Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 19:47]:
> The only thing I notice which is odd is that the system name has been
> set to upper case. That's never happened before.
Can you send me a copy of /dev/mtdblock1 (privately). What's the
hostname that d-i used?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * John Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-09 07:47]:
>> If I simply start the installation process I might end up with an
>> NSLU2 using a network address which I don't know.
>>
>> Is there any way of reading the current flash settings (specifically
>> the network settin
-Martin
The test RC release works great on the beagleboard (lenny unsupported,
TI Omap3530 Cortex). For reference I use the versatile netboot image,
a 2.6.27 kernel specific for omap, SD/MMC card, and usb-ethernet
adapter.
Install notes are here: http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardDebian (non qemu sec
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 17:21 +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> With the thecus, I won't have the
> option of pressing Ctrl-Alt-Fx to get a shell.
You can ssh in a second time and then exit the installer to get dropped
to a shell.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
we are trying to install in NAND only, but now i come across embedian
toolchain will support to create custom kernel and initrd. is it worthful?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:12:55PM +0530, Sivakumar.R.J wrote:
> >We are t
On 2008-11-07 15:17 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
> However, the images for ARM are already available. I'm now looking
> for people who are interested in testing these installer images.
>
> If you have a spare ARM machine or w
* John Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-09 09:15]:
> It worked for me but it was very slow, by a factor of ten.
Yeah, debian-installer isn't really designed for machines like the
NSLU2. There are in fact installers that run on the host system, such
as the one for SLIND, but I don't think anyon
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:12:55PM +0530, Sivakumar.R.J wrote:
>We are trying to create initrd and zImage for our customized IMX31 armel
>board ( in which we have tested debian chroot successfully). We need to
>boot the debian from the redboot. Is it possible to boot the debian with
>
Sivakumar.R.J wrote:
We are trying to create initrd and zImage for our customized IMX31 armel
board ( in which we have tested debian chroot successfully). We need to
boot the debian from the redboot. Is it possible to boot the debian with
you provided initrd and kernel image.
This initial RO
We are trying to create initrd and zImage for our customized IMX31 armel
board ( in which we have tested debian chroot successfully). We need to boot
the debian from the redboot. Is it possible to boot the debian with you
provided initrd and kernel image. If not please provide me the information
to
debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
However, the images for ARM are already available. ...
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/files/tmp/daily.img
It worked for me but it was very slow, by a factor of ten.
It took 3 hours and 15 minutes to install 278MB of Base sy
* John Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-09 07:47]:
> If I simply start the installation process I might end up with an
> NSLU2 using a network address which I don't know.
>
> Is there any way of reading the current flash settings (specifically
> the network settings) without re-installing the
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
> However, the images for ARM are already available. I'm now looking
> for people who are interested in testing these installer images.
>
> If you have a spare ARM machine or want to reinstall your machi
Hi Martin
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 07:17, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
> However, the images for ARM are already available. I'm now looking
> for people who are interested in testing these installer images.
I test
* Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-07 21:47]:
> > If you have a spare ARM machine or want to reinstall your machine for
> > some reason (for example to move from arm to armel)
>
> Will lenny contain only armel or will there also be the old arm architecture?
Yes, leny will support both a
On Fri 2008-11-07 11:34:19 -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I cannot give you a guarantee but I successfully made a degraded
> RAID1 with d-i recently. Simply specify a RAID1 with 2 disks but
> then only assign one disk to it.
I've also done this successfully with d-i recently (though not on arm
Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> If you have a spare ARM machine or want to reinstall your machine for
> some reason (for example to move from arm to armel)
Will lenny contain only armel or will there also be the old arm architecture?
Are there advantages of armel over arm
* Oliver Kiddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-07 17:21]:
> In order to switch to armel, I plan to do exactly this. As I'm not
> installing from the thecus firmware, do I just grab the initrd.gz and
> vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-iop32x from here and then boot them via tftp and
> redboot?
Yes, exactly.
> My ro
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
> However, the images for ARM are already available. I'm now looking
> for people who are interested in testing these installer images.
>
> If you have a spare ARM machine or want to reinstall your machi
debian-installer rc1 is going to be announced officially next week.
However, the images for ARM are already available. I'm now looking
for people who are interested in testing these installer images.
If you have a spare ARM machine or want to reinstall your machine for
some reason (for example to
32 matches
Mail list logo
