* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 13:00]: > > too long to build. So you'd have to come up with a good argument > > as to why we should add an OMAP kernel (e.g. how many users are > > there going to be; which devices use such a CPU, etc). > > The Beagleboard and other platforms derived from it seem to have > very good traction with active upstream work (low cost, wide > availiablity and an active push from TI help a lot here). There's > been quite a few people talking about running Debian on them in > embedded circles.
I actually read about the new Gumstix in LWN today which is also OMAP based. The Gumstix and Beagleboard definitely sound interesting. Maybe we can TI to donate some. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
