On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:14:32AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > Yes, exactly - it does continuous CVS checkout and build, and runs the
> > testsuite. Results are availabe via web and/or mailing list. There
> > could be several branches handled - current mainline, 2.3-branch, etc.
>
> That so
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:27, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> > I'm not sure, does it just do continuous builds of CVS? If so, then it
> > might be useful to catch errors as soon as they happen (We'll be shortly
> > doing that for most pieces of GNU software on hurd-i386). Otherwise, I
> > know Matthias Kl
Nope. They're sitting on my queue (and migrating slowly upwards)...
I'm spinning the binutils 2.13.1 release right now. After that I'm
going to make time to look them over; means setting up an ARM target
again probably...
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:44:10PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> BTW, D
BTW, Dan, did you look at those BFD patches for GOT refcounting that I
sent you when we discussed these failures before? I guess it was
probably a month or so back.
p.
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 15:35, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you can come up with a test case that shows the problem, then we
> bo
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:12:53AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> I'm not sure, does it just do continuous builds of CVS? If so, then it
> might be useful to catch errors as soon as they happen (We'll be shortly
> doing that for most pieces of GNU software on hurd-i386). Otherwise, I
> know Matthi
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:01:58AM -0500, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Okay, I'll bite: having a working toolchain again would be really nice!
> Having me poking in the code would probably do more harm than good, so
> I can offer something else: to revive the automatic build system for
> the toolchain
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 10:35:25AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you can come up with a test case that shows the problem, then we
> both win; and Phil or I or some other poor hacker can use that to fix
> the linker.
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:06:17AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > Ah, bu
If you can come up with a test case that shows the problem, then we
both win; and Phil or I or some other poor hacker can use that to fix
the linker.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:06:17AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Ah, but that's a skill I don't have and I haven't seen anyone say "I'll
> do it!". =)
Ah, but that's a skill I don't have and I haven't seen anyone say "I'll
do it!". =) What I do have is a porter who's confirmed that -z combreloc
is the cause of the arm failure, and we have a test in glibc that should
check for that which doesn't work. I've added debian-arm to the cc:
list to see
9 matches
Mail list logo
