value shown at the beginning of this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911560#15
I've not tested other values.
Since then, I've been side-tracked by some career changes [1] and did not
investigate further this issue.
All the best
[1]
https://www.linkedin.com
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 14:16:22 CET Dominique Dumont wrote:
> This is promising:
>
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-March/249735.html
Or not :-(
With this setup (and no GMAC_TX_DELAY), the network starts fine on rev Olimex
LIME2 rev G.2 but not on rev K.
All the best
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 12:13:23 CET Dominique Dumont wrote:
> I'll search in u-boot archive for other threads
This is promising:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-March/249735.html
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 12:23:06 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> someone (you, Dominique?) should test
> also against the "original" LIME2 rev. C or older, to ensure there is no
> regression there!
I don't have any other Lime2 board.
All the best
On Monday, 10 February 2020 03:39:39 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Please submit a patch to upstream fixing this in the appropriate files
> in configs/*; I'd guess configs/A20-OLinuXino-Lime2-eMMC_defconfig
> and/or configs/A20-OLinuXino-Lime2_defconfig.
It looks like a similar patches was submit
On Saturday, 8 February 2020 16:54:45 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Would be great if you could also test with patched u-boot in stable
> Debian - so we can consider fixing this in a point release.
I've tested together:
- Debian's u-boot debian/2019.01+dfsg-7 with CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY=3 tweak
- De
On samedi 8 février 2020 16:54:45 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I guess you mean that the negotiated ethernet mode is 1G.
yes.
> What is the
> actual performance - i.e. which concrete transfer speeds is achievable,
> in each direction, for each board?
I've seen only outgoing traffic at about 20
On Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:41:30 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> A20-OLinuXino-Lime 2 Rev. K Ethernet problem - No connection possible in
> installer https://bugs.debian.org/911560
So I've applied the suggestion to build u-boot with
CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY=3
I can confirm that both LIME2 re
On Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:41:30 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The summary of the summary, limit your link negotiation to 100MBit or
> even 10MBit.
Indeed. I've tweaked the eth0 to allow only 10Mbits/s full duplex and the
network is working.
But 100Mbits/s is not working. That's disappoi
Hello
I'm trying to setup a new Olimex LIME2 rev K board with Debian stable
installer.
The installation starts through serial console, but DHCP configuration does not
work.
In u-boot, ping command does not work:
=> ping 192.168.0.254
Speed: 1000, full duplex
*** ERROR: `ipaddr' not set
ping fa
On Saturday, 16 March 2019 03:37:21 CET Rick Thomas wrote:
> I tried installing the “non-free” firmware package for it
> (firmware-brcm80211)
but I get this message at boot time on the console:
> > [ 21.050008] brcmfmac mmc0:0001:1: firmware: failed to
> > loadbrcm/brcmfmac4330-sdio.txt (-2) [
[ I hope this mail is not out of topic for this list ]
Bootlin (ex Free Electrons) is launching a new project on kickstarter
to provide mainstream kernel support for the video part of AllWinner's chips.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bootlin/allwinner-vpu-support-in-the-official-linux-kern
On Wednesday, 3 January 2018 20:35:32 CET Karsten Merker wrote:
> From the flash-kernel point of view this approach should work,
> but in addition to that you would also need to replace the u-boot
> on the SD card with a u-boot built for the LIME2 as the u-boot
> binary is platform-specific. To wr
Hello
I'm going to upgrade my trusty olinuxino A20 lime to a lime2 board. Both board
have to NAND or MMC memory and the kernel is installed on a SD card.
To avoid a re-install from scratch, I'd like to re-use Sd card of the lime
board in the new lime2 board.
Is is possible to use flash-kernel
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 09:42:58 CEST Daniel Pocock wrote:
> The Debian wiki[2] has a list of possibilities, but which alternatives
> are best supported by Debian / Raspbian if somebody was starting today?
If you don't mind the graphical part, Olimex's OlinuXino boards [1] works fine
with vanill
On Sunday 19 July 2015 06:32:06 Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > I don't see a DHCP request on the server or anything on the monitor or
> > something on the USB-OTG port. Maybe I need an USB-to-serial cable?
>
> You'll almost certainly need a serial console to use the installer...
Indeed. I used the
On Monday 06 October 2014 10:18:01 Dario Piantanida wrote:
> The last thing I haven't been able to restore is the handling of the
> powerbutton: before me touching things, I could turn it off keeping it
> pressed for 2/3 seconds; a longer press would turn it off immediately.
Make sure that acpi
Le Sunday 22 January 2012 11:15:39, Iker Salmón San Millán a écrit :
> I don't know if you just miss-crossed my last email. the same version of
> kernel (not in the sheeva obiously) but amd64 instead of x86 works like
> charm. Do yo still think y should fill a report anyway?
yeah, I think you can
Le Sunday 22 January 2012 10:35:34, Iker Salmón San Millán a écrit :
> in my sheeva the kernel running is Linux sheeva 2.6.32-5-kirkwood
This is probably too old for current prctl.
To work-arounf the problem:
- you downgrade perl to 5.12 (not sure if this is possible in sid though)
- patch addgro
Le Thursday 19 January 2012 12:48:30, Iker Salmón San Millán a écrit :
> Thanks for your response, but i still don't know what to do in this case,
> should I report this bug to perl?
Since addgroup is working correctly on my amd64 machine, I'd say not yet.
This may be an issue with prctl functi
Le Thursday 19 January 2012 01:42:58, Iker Salmón San Millán a écrit :
> related /usr/sbin/addgroup lines:
>
> 85my $nogroup_id = getgrnam("nogroup") || 65534;
> 86$0 =~ s+.*/++;
> 87
> 88our $verbose = 1;# should we be verbose?
Well, according to perlvar(1) (look for \$0), mo
Le Wednesday 4 January 2012 19:48:36, Arnaud Patard a écrit :
> > All of these images are armhf. Is armel completely out ?
> > (too bad I've just created an armel chroot, well, I can redo this in
> > armhf).
>
> kernel doesn't care about armel or armhf so you can boot into a armel or
> armhf root
Le Wednesday 4 January 2012 18:27:17, Arnaud Patard a écrit :
> > I may be a bit optimistic: I've tried to boot a Efika Smarttop box on a
> > 3.0.8
>
> > kernel. The boot stops right at the beginning with the following message:
> if you want to boot a vanilla kernel, why don't you try 3.1 armhf k
Le Wednesday 4 January 2012 18:19:40, Konstantinos Margaritis a écrit :
> > Is this a known problem ?
>
> Yes, unfortunately getting a 3.x kernel to boot on an Efika
> Smarttop/Smartbook has proven to be a real PITA. We're working on it
> and we'll post kernel images here soon. In the meantime you
Hello
I may be a bit optimistic: I've tried to boot a Efika Smarttop box on a 3.0.8
kernel. The boot stops right at the beginning with the following message:
## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 90007fc0 ...
Image Name: Linux-3.0.8
Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed)
Le Wednesday 14 December 2011 11:49:10, Ruediger Leibrandt a écrit :
> Integrating such a gyromouse inside the photoframe-tablet seems of little
> use, either, as the normal accelerometers inside a tablet do somewhat the
> same as the mouses gyro's do.
Well, actually, I just need to know if the f
Le Sunday 11 December 2011 02:02:52, Rüdiger Leibrandt a écrit :
> It's a cheap technique material wise, and when you have a PCB which is
> simply laid into the inside of the wooden frame and then have metal wire
> run through drilled holes in the wood and solderd to the PCB, it's a
> low-manual
On Saturday 10 December 2011 02:01:51 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> batteries / power. ah. when you say "digital photo frame", do you
> mean "portable device" or do you mean "put it on the wall or
> mantlepiece"?
I mean always on power socket. No batteries
> > Then, we'd need to field
Hello Luke
Le Saturday 3 December 2011 22:36:41, vous avez écrit :
> about the digital photo frame idea: that's an even simpler version of
> a tablet, effectively. are you looking to build it yourself? if so,
> below
No really build it myself.
First, we need a prototype to develop our software
Le Friday 28 October 2011 18:01:34, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton a écrit :
> it's up to you, people. if you want a low-cost freedom box, or a
> low-cost server, or a low-cost tablet or a low-cost nettop or whatever
> but, unlike many offerings, with an actual decent CPU that won't have
> you regr
Le vendredi 20 mai 2011 21:28:08, peter green a écrit :
> Any thoughts on this? should I file a bug report and if so where?
I've found the same problem with linux 2.6.32 from Angstrom distribution.
My best guess is that's a hardware or firmware problem that may be worked
around by the kernel.
31 matches
Mail list logo
