Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread gene heskett
On 12/28/22 22:41, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:17 PM gene heskett wrote: But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 version 0.10 has been available for several years if I read ticket dates on sourceforge correctly. dfu-util-v0.9 on a banana pi m5, cannot do any dfu-u

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread gene heskett
On 12/28/22 19:17, Diederik de Haas wrote: On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*) and experimental (2023.01-rc*) # arm64 ... rock64-rk3328 I don't recall ever having issues with u-boot on my Rock64'

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:21:05PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get > >>> test

Re: Bug#1016963: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Rick Thomas
Here's another Cubox-i. This one's running Bookworm. shows a surprising number of u-boot- packages installed, ( = exynos, imx, omap, sunxi) as well as plain "u-boot". All of them are version 2022.04+dfsg-2+b1. Rebooting while watching the serial console output says "U-Boot SPL 2016.05-rc2+d

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:17 PM gene heskett wrote: > > But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 > version 0.10 has been available for several years if I read ticket dates > on sourceforge correctly. > > dfu-util-v0.9 on a banana pi m5, cannot do any dfu-utils duties. sudo > dfu-util -l on

Re: Bug#1016963: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Rick Thomas
A Cubox-i running Debian bullseye (11.6). According to It has "u-boot-tools" (version 2021.01+dfsg-5) installed, but none of the u-boot- packages installed. If I reboot it and watch the serial console, I see it showing "U-boot 2021.01-dfsg-5" so that version must have gotten into the firmwar

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2022-12-28 at 21:35 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:59:42PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > > But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 > Armbian != Debian. While that is true, it seems that Armbian is an overlay derivative, which means that they just use D

Re: Bug#1016963: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Rick Thomas
Raspberry Pi 4B (8GB) running bullseye, but does not seem to have any version of u-boot installed. Weird? Running tells me that the following (among lots of others) versions are available. Should I install one of them and see what happens? Package u-boot-rpi: p 2021.01+dfsg-5 stable 500 P

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*) > and experimental (2023.01-rc*) > > # arm64 > ... > rock64-rk3328 I don't recall ever having issues with u-boot on my Rock64's, so for me 2022.04 - 2022.10 sure

Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-12-22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-08-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2022-08-10, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> This bug is just to delay migration to testing while more platforms get >>> tested. If you have a relevent board, please consider testing and >>> reporting the status: >>

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread gene heskett
On 12/28/22 16:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hello Gene! On 12/28/22 21:59, gene heskett wrote: But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 version 0.10 has been available for several years if I read ticket dates on sourceforge correctly. dfu-util-v0.9 on a banana pi m5, cannot d

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Wednesday, 28 December 2022 22:35:28 CET Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > hang out on IRC on debian-arm or debian-boot Or #armbian on libera signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:59:42PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: Hi Gene, Armbian != Debian. What they may choose to do - who knows. They might even cause a Wicked Witch of the West to appear and threaten Toto whenever there's a problem. If you want support on the Banana Pi m5, you'll need to find

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello Gene! On 12/28/22 21:59, gene heskett wrote: But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 version 0.10 has been available for several years if I read ticket dates on sourceforge correctly. dfu-util-v0.9 on a banana pi m5, cannot do any dfu-utils duties. sudo dfu-util -l only lists t

armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-28 Thread gene heskett
But its dfu-util is truly ancient at version 0.9 version 0.10 has been available for several years if I read ticket dates on sourceforge correctly. dfu-util-v0.9 on a banana pi m5, cannot do any dfu-utils duties. sudo dfu-util -l only lists the authors, no dfu capable devices on the bpi5 Whe