Re: Rpi compute module 4

2021-08-19 Thread Diederik de Haas
On donderdag 19 augustus 2021 18:50:54 CEST Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Raspberry Pi OS is off-topic here True, but I'm not sure this case is off-topic as (iiuc) Lucas found a solution for Raspbian. The problem could use more details/specifics though. Lucas' use of 'raspi' could mean a bunch of t

Re: Rpi compute module 4

2021-08-19 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 02:04:50PM +, Lucas Marshall wrote: > Hi, > > I’m using the Rpi compute module 4 with io board and am trying to work with > raspi bullseye arm64 however the usb connector is by default disabled. > Raspbian provide a solution in the form of an overlay > “dtoverlay=dwc

Rpi compute module 4

2021-08-19 Thread Lucas Marshall
Hi, I’m using the Rpi compute module 4 with io board and am trying to work with raspi bullseye arm64 however the usb connector is by default disabled. Raspbian provide a solution in the form of an overlay “dtoverlay=dwc2,dr_mode=host” which is pasted into the config.txt file in the root folder

Re: is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Luca Olivetti
El 19/8/21 a les 11:44, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: El 19/8/21 a les 10:56, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: El 19/8/21 a les 10:05, Arnd Bergmann ha escrit: To confirm that this is the actual problem, can you try building the package using '-O2 -march=armv4t' or '-O2 -march=armv5t' to override the defau

Re: is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Luca Olivetti
El 19/8/21 a les 10:56, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: El 19/8/21 a les 10:05, Arnd Bergmann ha escrit: To confirm that this is the actual problem, can you try building the package using '-O2 -march=armv4t' or '-O2 -march=armv5t' to override the default 'armv5te'? With -march=armv5t it doesn't work

Re: is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Luca Olivetti
El 19/8/21 a les 10:05, Arnd Bergmann ha escrit: To confirm that this is the actual problem, can you try building the package using '-O2 -march=armv4t' or '-O2 -march=armv5t' to override the default 'armv5te'? With -march=armv5t it doesn't work (same failure), I'll try with armv4t. FWIW this

Re: is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Luca Olivetti
El 19/8/21 a les 9:03, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: I then recompiled it with -O0 instead of the default -O2 and this time it works (will try later with -O1). Nope, with -O1 same failure. Bye -- Luca

Re: is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:03 AM Luca Olivetti wrote: > > Hello, > > I upgraded a test machine (buffalo linkstation pro/Marvell Orion5x) from > buster to bullseye, then I rebuilt the dspam[*] deb (since it's been > dropped by debian since buster, I did the same there). > The newly built binary does

is there some known regression with gcc on armel?

2021-08-19 Thread Luca Olivetti
Hello, I upgraded a test machine (buffalo linkstation pro/Marvell Orion5x) from buster to bullseye, then I rebuilt the dspam[*] deb (since it's been dropped by debian since buster, I did the same there). The newly built binary doesn't start, complaining of a configuration error, the binary bui