[ Last big cross-post; I'll just post to the cross-distro list in
future! ]
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:15:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> [ARM summit at Plumbers, Thursday 8th September]
>
>UPDATE: we've not had many people
2011/8/31 Alessio Sangalli :
> On 08/31/2011 05:41 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Kernel images are not done yet (on the ports to do list). Hence install
>> images are not done yet either (they need kernels after all).
>
> I have my own kernel, with the specific drivers for this SoC and so
> on.
On 08/31/2011 05:41 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Kernel images are not done yet (on the ports to do list). Hence install
> images are not done yet either (they need kernels after all).
I have my own kernel, with the specific drivers for this SoC and so
on... how would you suggest to proceed?
b
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:49:45PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> You should be able to run debootstrap or multistrap against
> debian-ports.org armhf port (but better use a mirror as master is
> quite slow).
>
> Sorry, debian-ports.org have some mx5 and omap kernel packages for armhf.
Oh I must not
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:49:49PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> Interworking is a madatory of the ARM EABI. As mentioned above, interworking
> is basically free on armv5 and later architectures. It should never be
> disabled.
Wel the gcc in armhf has it off by default, and the description says
i
> > Is that true? For ARMv7, interworking is essentially free and Thumb code
> > would likely be faster due to its smaller memory footprint. So I would
> > have thought that not only should Thumb code be catered for, but
> > actively encouraged. Or am I missing something?
>
> We only use thumb2 in
Hello,
2011/8/31 Lennart Sorensen :
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:25:26PM -0700, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>> Hi I have a new ARM board with a dual Cortex-A9 CPU. I was wondering if
>> I can already do an ARMHF netinstall or find a base Debian ARMHF system
>> to mount on a USB memory stick to test...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:25:26PM -0700, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> Hi I have a new ARM board with a dual Cortex-A9 CPU. I was wondering if
> I can already do an ARMHF netinstall or find a base Debian ARMHF system
> to mount on a USB memory stick to test...
Kernel images are not done yet (on the p
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:23:18AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> Is that true? For ARMv7, interworking is essentially free and Thumb code
> would likely be faster due to its smaller memory footprint. So I would
> have thought that not only should Thumb code be catered for, but
> actively encouraged. Or am I
On 31 August 2011 10:55, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:23:18AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
>>On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:34 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>> My changes were to remove -mfpu=softfp and -mthumb-interworking, since
>>> as far as I can tell armhf uses -mfpu=hardfp and -mno-t
On 31 August 2011 11:56, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3 -mthumb -march=armv7-a
That should actually be -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 to be more precise.
Konstantinos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:23:18AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
>On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:34 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> My changes were to remove -mfpu=softfp and -mthumb-interworking, since
>> as far as I can tell armhf uses -mfpu=hardfp and -mno-thumbinterworking
>> by default.
>
>Is that true? For
12 matches
Mail list logo
