Hallo,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:00:24PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Has anyone successfully used kexec to boot one kirkwood kernel from
> another? I've been trying to do it on a Seagate DockStar, but
> all I see is this:
>
> # kexec -l --append="console=ttyS0,115200" zImage
> # kexec -
On 26/01/11 16:19, Samuele Bianchi wrote:
Hi!
I'm using an e-sata sheevaplug ( NewIt version ) since 1 year and i'm
very proud of my plug computer with Debian 6.
Today i have seen this plug from ionics web site:
http://www.ionicsplug.com/nimbus2000.html
Is it avaiable an installer for this plug ?
Has anyone successfully used kexec to boot one kirkwood kernel from
another? I've been trying to do it on a Seagate DockStar, but
all I see is this:
# kexec -l --append="console=ttyS0,115200" zImage
# kexec -e
[ 35.553632] Starting new kernel
Uncompressing Linux... done, booting
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:04:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> It's mostly for historical reasons - it works and there's no obvious
> reason to change.
echoing binary is a big ugly perhaps. devio takes hex input and outputs
binary nicely.
--
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
* Rob J. Epping [2011-01-22 22:01]:
> Does anyone on this list know why the UUID would change? And if this
> is documented somewhere?
It might be a good idea to send your question to
debian-ker...@lists.debian.org and the mdadm maintainer:
pkg-mdadm-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--
Martin Michlm
* Samuele Bianchi [2011-01-26 11:19]:
> Today i have seen this plug from ionics web site:
> http://www.ionicsplug.com/nimbus2000.html
>
> Is it avaiable an installer for this plug ? It has a Marvell
> 88F6282RISC at 2.0 Ghz instead of Marvell 88F6281 at 1.2 ghz.
This device is not supported at
* Matthew Palmer [2011-01-26 22:14]:
> > I have some questions about that: 1. Why using devio at all, would
> > not it be easier to use echo?
> I'm *guessing* it's for readability, but honestly I have no idea. Martin
> Michlmayr is probably the go-to guy for that sort of thing.
It's mostly for h
* Tanguy Ortolo [2011-01-26 12:25]:
> Thanks, it already has one:
> bubba3 MACH_BUBBA3 BUBBA3 2893
> (Bubba is the old name for Excito home servers: Bubba and Bubba|2, the
> third model's marketing name having been shortened to B3)
While there's a machine id, there's no
All,
I have a small problem that's I've been beating my head against for two
days.
I've installed debian onto an sdcard according to [1]. This required a
new U-boot [2]. For grins, I chose encrypted LVM. It works fine with
the 2.6.33.3flipflip kernel [3]. However, I'm trying to get 2.6.3
Labdien!
Tev telefons nomainijies?
Man te ir reals risinajums Tavam problemam, tapec gribeetu piezvanit, bet
numurs izslegts.
Ok, lai vai tur kas, man viss super, tapec, ka es dabuju darbu,
kas ir vienkarshaks par vienkarshu un 3440 USD menesi es nopelnu.
Vai nu piezvani man, vai ieej http://www
Hi!
I'm using an e-sata sheevaplug ( NewIt version ) since 1 year and i'm very
proud of my plug computer with Debian 6.
Today i have seen this plug from ionics web site:
http://www.ionicsplug.com/nimbus2000.html
Is it avaiable an installer for this plug ? It has a Marvell 88F6282RISC at
2.0 G
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011, Wookey a écrit :
> The list is available here:
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
>
> The excito B3 is not listed under that name but then things are
> usually under some kind of dev name, not the final marketing name
Sure: it is named “Bubba3”, id 2893
Hi all!
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 12:14:01 Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
...
>
> > 2. How can such a kernel, prepended with some bytes, be
> >bootable at all, as this shifts its entry point and all its data?
>
> That's an excellent
+++ Tanguy Ortolo [2011-01-26 11:43 +0100]:
> 3. Where are these machine ids defined in the kernel? I hope Excito B3
>are already known…
The list is available here:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
The excito B3 is not listed under that name but then things are
usually under s
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > 2. How can such a kernel, prepended with some bytes, be
> >bootable at all, as this shifts its entry point and all its data?
> That's an excellent question. I kinda assumed that the bytes were actually
> ARM machine code, but I've ne
Hi everyone,
As a follow-up event to http://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2011/EmdebianSprint
Genesi is also organizing an event in San Antonio. Details about the event
can be found here:
http://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2011/GenesiSprintSanAntonio
We would like all interested parties to add their names
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
>> 3. Where are these machine ids defined in the kernel? I hope Excito B3
>>are already known???
>
> I believe the file of interest is arch/arm/tools/mach-types. Depending on
> whether the device is actually the same hardware as another, i
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Now, I have questions about the machine id. In flash-kernel, this is a
> number that is prepended to the kernel before creating the uImage. For
> instance, for "Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live":
> kfile="/boot/vmlinuz-$kvers"
> #
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> You may get some ideas of things that need to be done from a lengthy blog
> article I wrote about my experiences porting d-i to the DNS-323:
> http://hezmatt.org/~mpalmer/blog/general/porting_d-i_to_the_dns_323.html
Nice, thank you. This conf
19 matches
Mail list logo
