On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:17:50AM +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-10-30 10:00 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > The decision for dropping support for an older subarch is for the porters
> > > to
> > > make; though dropping the subarch which still provides a number of the
> > > autobuilders is prob
* Wookey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 11:27]:
> On 2006-10-30 10:00 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > The decision for dropping support for an older subarch is for the porters
> > > to
> > > make; though dropping the subarch which still provides a number of the
> > > autobuilders is probably not a
On 2006-10-30 10:00 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > The decision for dropping support for an older subarch is for the porters to
> > make; though dropping the subarch which still provides a number of the
> > autobuilders is probably not a great idea.
>
> None of the ARM autobuilders are v3 anymore
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 00:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:16:35AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > OTOH, we've carried 386 for a long time and there are so few of those
> > around anymore. I'd prefer not worrying about the v3 machines, but
> > our policy tends to be inclus
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:16:35AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> OTOH, we've carried 386 for a long time and there are so few of those
> around anymore. I'd prefer not worrying about the v3 machines, but
> our policy tends to be inclusive.
Er, i386 hasn't been supported in Debian since woody.
And
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 00:39 +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> So we are back to, it never failed to build on cats, but always did on
> netwinder.
Mm, strange. I tried to build it by hand on smackdown and it failed
again there:
Creating ../../build/deps/net_2_0_corlib.dll.makefrag ...
make[8]: Leaving
6 matches
Mail list logo
