On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:17:50AM +0000, Wookey wrote: > On 2006-10-30 10:00 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > The decision for dropping support for an older subarch is for the porters > > > to > > > make; though dropping the subarch which still provides a number of the > > > autobuilders is probably not a great idea. > > > > None of the ARM autobuilders are v3 anymore. Dropping v4 support would > > be a bad idea, since netwinders make up a fairly large part of the > > installed base, but I don't think anybody is even considering that. > > > > Dropping v3 does sound like a good idea to me though. > > Any objections? > > Wookey > -- No objection particularly, but I've a RISC PC sitting here unused which is only v3 AIUI. I've also 2 x NSLU2 - would be happy to build/test for v3 or to continue limited support. I'm no ARM developer and it's a long time since I've programmed in anger (though I am a DD) - I'd need LOTS of support from the more experienced folk around here. Would also be willing to beta test cross-compilation environments on a fast AMD64 - I gather you were nobbled at the Expo by a colleague of mine wanting info :)
Andy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
