Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:17:06:29:51+0100] scribed:
>
> This problem has been already fixed in more recent versions of apache.
>
> Fabio
What does this mean? Is this only an issue of apache DEB version?
By using the plural word, versions, do you mean that I have some
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:17:06:29:51+0100] scribed:
> >
> > This problem has been already fixed in more recent versions of apache.
> >
> > Fabio
>
> What does this mean? Is this only an issue of apache DEB version?
no the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 224128 + moreinfo
Bug#224128: Apache1.3.29+PHP+mod_includes BUG
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tags 224128 + unreproducible
Bug#224128: Apache1.3.29+PHP+mod_includes BUG
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
> stop
Stoppi
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Apache gave me a "sed" error during upgrade. Log pasted in below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/apache$ dpkg -l apache
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:32:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223829: fixed in apache 1.3.29.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:29:51 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224049: libapache-mod-perl: Segmentaion fault when
starting apache
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hi Paul,
which version of sed are you using? For what i can see here you
have a mixed environment with woody/sid packages. When i test apache i
almost always test a full upgrade from woody to sid and i have never seen
this problem. If you can track the problem down to a specific version of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 223780 + moreinfo
Bug#223780: apache-common: 'modules.conf' included twice
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tags 223780 + unreproducible
Bug#223780: apache-common: 'modules.conf' included twice
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unrepro
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I have encountered the following problem: I set up Basic authentication
in access.conf:
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Passwor Required"
AuthUserFile /etc/apache/pwd
Require valid-user
/etc/apache/pwd contains:
addmin:J/HrQ
I'm still seeing error 500, Internal Server Error with "premature end of
script headers" in error logs with 1.3.29.0.1-2
Downgrading to last 1.3.28 makes the scripts work once more.
The bug still persists, now the paths are correct but cgi's are still broken.
[2003-12-17 08:37:07]: info: (target/actual) uid: (ytti/ytti) gid:
(guru/guru) cmd: fortune.cgi
[2003-12-17 08:37:07]: error: pam_open_session(): [6] Permission denied
Changing to old suexec.disabled and it works a-ok.
tags 224233 + pending
stop
quit
Ok it is a sed problem.. i could reproduce the bug easily. When i answered
back before i totally forgot i had a chroot handy ;)
Thanks
Fabio
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paul Telford wrote:
> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.29.0.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Apache gave m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 224233 + pending
Bug#224233: apache: upgrade bombs with sed errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Package: apache-common
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid
When running /usr/sbin/modules-config to create the modules.conf it
fails with a sed error. Line 138 of modules-config has a sed -s command.
It appears that this should be sed -e. Changing it as suggested works
for me.
--
Hi Saku,
thanks for tracking down the problem. I will upload a new version
today without the pam_limits support.
If you can be so kind to leave the bug closed we will avoid the usual
couple of tons of mails going around.
Fabio
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Saku Ytti wrote:
> The bug still persi
tags 224260 + pending
stop
quit
OK fixed in CVS. thanks for spotting it. In my tests i never got an error
message and it was working. Which version of sed are you using?
Thanks
Fabio
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Matt Jackson wrote:
> Package: apache-common
> Version: 1.3.29.0.1-2
> Severity: important
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get install apache fails with the following
Setting up apache (1.3.29.0.1-2) ...
Error: libphp5.so does not have a corresponding .info file.
Error: the above error list does not permit a saf
I know you already marked this pending, but here's some more
information just in case it helps you.
After some more digging I found that this is caused by modules-config
which is not compatible with older versions of sed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/apache$ dpkg -l apache-common
Desired=Unkn
Hi Garamszegi,
this is mostlikely an error in your configuration. Please
use modules-config and remove all the auth modules that you do not need
and leave only mod_auth. This should make it working. Let me know asap if
it does or not.
Thanks
Fabio
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Garamszegi
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:17:08:19:39+0100] scribed:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
>
> > Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:17:06:29:51+0100]
> > scribed:
> > >
> > > This problem has been already fixed in more recent versions of apache
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 224260 + pending
Bug#224260: apache-common: error converting module information
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
apache_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apache_1.3.29.0.1-3.dsc
apache_1.3.29.0.1-3.diff.gz
apache-doc_1.3.29.0.1-3_all.deb
apache_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-ssl_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-perl_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-dev_1.3.
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:17:17:14:48+0100] scribed:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
>
> > However, the problem persists!
> >
> > # COLUMNS=110 dpkg -l '*apache*' | grep ^i
> > ii apache1.3.29.0.1-2 Versatile, high-performance
>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> However, the problem persists!
>
> # COLUMNS=110 dpkg -l '*apache*' | grep ^i
> ii apache1.3.29.0.1-2 Versatile, high-performance
> HTTP server
> ii apache-common 1.3.29.0.1-2 Support files for all Apache
Hi Garamszegi,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> my current modules.conf:
>
>
[SNIP]
>
> Shall be any of these modules removed? Is there other places to
> allow/disallow modules?
No this looks fine but i just noticed:
> >> addmin:J/HrQ7c/b6bNQ
> >> jerry:jerry
Accepted:
apache-common_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-dbg_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-dev_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dev_1.3.29.0.1-3_i386.deb
apache-doc_1
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:17:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224260: fixed in apache 1.3.29.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:17:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224233: fixed in apache 1.3.29.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
I removed the bug from the CC since it is closed and we are going a bit
off topic.
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> OK, now apache starts while mod_perl is enabled. Thank you.
no problem.
>
> Is it a _bug_ that apt did *not* warn me about a dependency issue for
> libapache-mod-
Hi Paul,
-s was a typo, reported in another bug and fixed. I already
uploaded -3 with both the -s to -e correction and the version dependency.
Fabio
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Paul Telford wrote:
> I know you already marked this pending, but here's some more
> information just in case it help
Hi Jordan,
here you have a bit of a messed up system but i think the problem
you have is due to:
> ii php4-imap 4.3.3-3IMAP module for php4
> ii php4-pgsql 4.3.2+rc3-3PostgreSQL module for php4
php4 is broken and crashes apache when these 2 extensions are used
toge
Hello,
checked again modules.conf, and it was different from this, as the apache
upgrade script has inserted db, dbm, sys and anon authentication modules,
which I missed first. Removing them solves my problem. How can I prevent
modules-config from inserting them again on apache upgrades?
>
> Hi
Hi Fabio,
my current modules.conf:
LoadModule config_log_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule mime_magic_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_mime_magic.so
LoadModule mime_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_mime.so
LoadModule negotiation_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_negotiation.so
L
for some time now, whenever i apt-get install anything, dpkg has been
trying to configure libapache-mod-perl, and failing. it'll present me
with the config screen:
Setting up libapache-mod-perl (1.28-1) ...
Configuring
1. mod_vhost_alias 22. mod_access43. mod_auth_di
Hi Nori,
please upgrade apache and libapache-mod-perl to the latest
versions. the one you are using has an error (if not more.. i can't
remember on the fly) in the postinst script that depends from another
bunch of bug fixes in apache-common.
Fabio
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Nori Heikkinen wro
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:38:48 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224259: apache: user not found in Basic authentication
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:14:33 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224274: apache: libphp5.so does not have a corresponding
.info file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Dec 17, 11:25am, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> now i actually want libapache-mod-mp3, and its concomitant packages.
> i need libapache-mod-perl for this, if i read everything correctly ...
This is a bit offtopic, but what made you think you need mod-perl to use
mod-mp3? These two are completely unrel
38 matches
Mail list logo
