你好：
春天夏天来了，气候日益干燥，日照越发强烈,如果不注意保养一下脸部的话，很快脸部就会变得又红又
黄，长期如此面部就会出现更多的皱纹，加速面部的衰老，所以，日常的面部、颈部、手部护理不能缺少，
上美容院服务费太贵，产品更贵。我们是名品网上直销店，有优秀的产品，绝对便宜的价格，我们的
价格仅仅只是厂家的直销价格，更重要的是，我们的产品完全可以自己给自己护理，省去了大量的服
务费，让专业级的美容护理变得简单化，真正做到人人爱美，美伴一生。
欢迎访问我们的网站：（请将以下链接地址复制到IE的地址栏中即可浏览）
http://www.plmm.cn.gs
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
When Apache it configured as a cacheing proxy server,
it runs its periodic cache cleaning at its normal priority
(nice=0).
The cleaning involves a lot of disk reading, and tends to bog the
system down.
It would be nicer if the cache cleanin
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.29.0.1-3
Yesterday I rebooted my webserver (to bring up the 2.4.25 kernel) and
today noticed that my webserver no longer worked. The apache-ssl binary
was last modified on Dec 17, but strangely the problem just appeared.
The symptom is that apache-ssl runs but it
On Feb 24, 4:28pm, Fortunatas Dirginčius wrote:
> Here's what I get running apt-get install -f
>
>
> Setting up apache (1.3.29.0.1-5) ...
> Error: 510mod_auth_useragent.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
> Error: 510mod_cgi_debug.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
> Error: 51
Package: apache2-common
Severity: normal
The [1][2]Apache documentation indicates that when using
NameVirtualHost, the VirtualHost directive should use * (as opposed to
_default_) to match all IP addresses. However my experimentation has
demonstrated that if I have multiple VirtualHost entries, wi
Package: apache2-common
Severity: normal
The contents of the default ssl.conf are not sufficient to allow the
establishment of an https connection.
/usr/share/doc/apache2/examples/ssl.conf.gz contains a very near
complete sample ssl.conf, and requires only minimal changes to make it
functional. It
> > > This is because your DNS is broken.
> >
> > In what way do you supsect that my DNS is broken? I am running under
> > usermodelinux, so that may effect the order that certain things happen.
>
> I'm not the OP but 'broken DNS' was my first guess too. Your server
> probably tries to resolve i
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:02:00AM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > Every time my webserver reboots, apache2-mpm-perchild takes around 3
> > > minutes to startup. For a long time I thought it was hanging, and
> > > would simply kill it, but today I realized that after waiting long
> > > enough it wo
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:55:48 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234552: apache2-mpm-perchild: extremely slow startup at
boot time
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:02:00AM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > Every time my webserver reboots, apache2-mpm-perchild takes around 3
> > > minutes to startup. For a long time I thought it was hanging, and
> > > would simply kill it, but today I realized that after waiting long
> > > enough it wo
> > Every time my webserver reboots, apache2-mpm-perchild takes around 3
> > minutes to startup. For a long time I thought it was hanging, and
> > would simply kill it, but today I realized that after waiting long
> > enough it would eventually start (at least some of the time). I
> > realize that
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:41:11AM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> Every time my webserver reboots, apache2-mpm-perchild takes around 3
> minutes to startup. For a long time I thought it was hanging, and would
> simply kill it, but today I realized that after waiting long enough it
> would eventually s
Here's what I get running apt-get install -f
Setting up apache (1.3.29.0.1-5) ...
Error: 510mod_auth_useragent.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
Error: 510mod_cgi_debug.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
Error: 510mod_filter.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
Error:
Package: apache2-mpm-perchild
Severity: normal
Every time my webserver reboots, apache2-mpm-perchild takes around 3
minutes to startup. For a long time I thought it was hanging, and would
simply kill it, but today I realized that after waiting long enough it
would eventually start (at least some o
more likely is that apache2-mpm-threadpool will go away.
-Thom
>
>
Package: apache2-mpm-worker
Severity: minor
The current apache2-mpm-worker description is misleading. It mentions
that it "It is considerably faster than the traditional model, but has
not currently received as much testing." This certainly used to be the
case, but no longer accurately reflects th
Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Severity: minor
The current description of the apache2-mpm-prefork Debian package is
incomplete, and insufficient to allow a user to evaluate its utility
without consulting Apache's documentation themselves. Here is a good
paragraphs I found in Apache's documentation t
Package: apache2-mpm-threadpool
Severity: minor
The current apache2-mpm-threadpool description is misleading. It
metnions that it is an experimental implementation. However it also
claims that "It is somewhat faster and less CPU intensive than the
worker model." According to the [1]most recent apa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 229677 unreproducible
Bug#229677: apache2-common: segfault-o-rama with ldap auth
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 229677 important
Bug#229677: apache2-common: segfault-o-rama with ldap auth
Severity set to `important'.
Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.0.48-7
Severity: normal
Hey. I'm finding myself running into a problem a lot, and it's a bit of
a pain. I edit a file in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/, and keep it open
to test a change with apachectl configtest (for easy undoing). However,
I get the following:
[
20 matches
Mail list logo
