Jason White, le Tue 02 Aug 2011 17:56:15 +1000, a écrit :
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Hi. I returned to at-spi 1.0. My gnome is now accessible again except for
> > gnome-terminal. When I started looking, I noticed there isn't an atk
> > module in
> > /usr/lib/gtk-3.0/modules
> > I created the sym
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> I'm not critisizing anyone, just trying to understand and help make the next
> debian release have the best access to the gui.
> Like it or not, more and more things are only possible with a gui app.
I'm not finding this to be the case. The only reason why I run X at all is f
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Kenny Hitt (02/08/2011):
> > How does a package contain a file that's supposed to be part of
> > another package?
>
> Well, that's a module which uses libatk's features, which is why you
> have a dependency expressed in terms
Kenny Hitt (02/08/2011):
> How does a package contain a file that's supposed to be part of
> another package?
Well, that's a module which uses libatk's features, which is why you
have a dependency expressed in terms of package dependencies. At the
library level, the dependency can be seen this wa
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:46:59PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Actually, no. the libatk-adaptor package depends on atk. The atk module
> > should be part of gtk 2.0 as well as gtk 3.0.
> > At least that's what I understand from reading and looking at package
> > descr
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> Actually, no. the libatk-adaptor package depends on atk. The atk module
> should be part of gtk 2.0 as well as gtk 3.0.
> At least that's what I understand from reading and looking at package
> descriptions.
> the libatk-adaptor package is only needed to get atk events to a
hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:07:18PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > More important, not sure why there isn't an atk module for gtk3 since I
> > thought it was required.
>
> I'm sure there is one in AT-SPI 2. It's part of the AT-SPI package.
>
Actually, no. the libatk-adapt
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> More important, not sure why there isn't an atk module for gtk3 since I
> thought it was required.
I'm sure there is one in AT-SPI 2. It's part of the AT-SPI package.
What I haven't checked is whether there is one for GTK+ 2.x in the AT-SPI 2
package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:38:56PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Thanks, the symlink was my problem. Once I got it right, gnome-terminal
> > works again.
>
> This is off-topic for the list, but whenever you want to search a directory
> hierarchy for broken symlinks:
> fi
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> Thanks, the symlink was my problem. Once I got it right, gnome-terminal
> works again.
This is off-topic for the list, but whenever you want to search a directory
hierarchy for broken symlinks:
find -L -type l
will do it. (Of course you can specify a path to start at, as usu
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 05:56:15PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Hi. I returned to at-spi 1.0. My gnome is now accessible again except for
> > gnome-terminal. When I started looking, I noticed there isn't an atk
> > module in
> > /usr/lib/gtk-3.0/modules
> > I created t
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> Hi. I returned to at-spi 1.0. My gnome is now accessible again except for
> gnome-terminal. When I started looking, I noticed there isn't an atk module
> in
> /usr/lib/gtk-3.0/modules
> I created the sym link again, but it didn't fix my problem.
I have just tested it here,
Hi. I returned to at-spi 1.0. My gnome is now accessible again except for
gnome-terminal. When I started looking, I noticed there isn't an atk module in
/usr/lib/gtk-3.0/modules
I created the sym link again, but it didn't fix my problem.
If i file this as a bug, what package?
Kenny
13 matches
Mail list logo
