Hi.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:46:59PM +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Kenny Hitt <hittsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Actually, no. the libatk-adaptor package depends on atk. The atk module
> > should be part of gtk 2.0 as well as gtk 3.0.
> > At least that's what I understand from reading and looking at package
> > descriptions.
> > the libatk-adaptor package is only needed to get atk events to at-spi 2.0.
>
> What I meant was this:
> jason@jdc:~$ dlocate libatk-bridge.so
> at-spi: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
> which shows that it comes from the at-spi package..
>
This is strange. Apt-cache shows the at-spi packages depends on libatk.
blackbox:~# apt-cache show at-spi
Package: at-spi
Version: 1.30.1-3
Installed-Size: 1688
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
<pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Replaces: libatspi-dev (<< 1.6.0-2)
Depends: gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.29.3), libatspi1.0-0 (>=
1.30.1), libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.15.0), libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6~), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4),
libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.0.2), libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.78), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0),
libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1),
libgconf2-4 (>= 2.27.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.19.7),
libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.14.10), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0),
libsm6, libx11-6, libxtst6, libgail-common
It's clear something isn't right.
How does a package contain a file that's supposed to be part of another package?
I'm not critisizing anyone, just trying to understand and help make the next
debian release have the best access to the gui.
Like it or not, more and more things are only possible with a gui app.
Kenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110802111715.ga3...@hittsjunk.net
