debian does not have in its repository:
https://github.com/bellard/quickjs.
The current version of edbrowse uses quickjs to do its java work.
When running the debian version of edbrowse like:
edbrowse -f1
I get mailbox not specified in your .ebrc file.
The mailbox directory on this machine is
That mailbox line was a comment. Removing the comment made it go active.
Hallo Jude,
great to see an Edbrowse user pop up :).
Jude DaShiell schrieb am 14.03.2025, 11:59 -0400:
>debian does not have in its repository:
>https://github.com/bellard/quickjs.
Not true, yet not in stable. It's in testing, though.
>When running the debian version of
I attended Scale, a Linux conference here in Passadena. A session about doing
everything in the terminal. They suggested browsh, which we explained what was
wrong with it, but we did also mention EdBrows, but there were no presenters
this year splotlighting accessibility.
Chime
Hi
Chime Hart schrieb am 14.03.2025, 9:25 -0700:
>I attended Scale, a Linux conference here in Passadena. A session about doing
>everything in the terminal. They suggested browsh, which we explained what
>was wrong with it, but we did also mention EdBrows, but there were no
>presenters this year
No longer useable with or without a google-generated app password. I just
found that out.
Hi
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 07.02.2023, 0:50 +0100:
>> [1] http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/lang/quickjs/
>>
>> (I suppose I can do the initial packaging, but not sure I’d
>> be willing to maintain it. And even if I would, I’d need a
>> sponsor still.)
>
>That's
Hello,
Ivan Shmakov, le lun. 06 févr. 2023 13:07:31 +, a ecrit:
> [Please do not Cc: me, as I’m “on the list,” so to say,
Are you on pkg-a11y-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net?
(that's the one that gets the bts mails)
> The latest version of Edbrowse currently tagged in t
Okay, try ,p to show entire page of text inside of edbrowse. On
Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 02:52:57
From: Paul Gevers
To: Debian Accessibility Team
Subject: Re: edbrowse weird behavior
Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
On 26-02-18 23:04, Jude DaShiell wrote
Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
On 26-02-18 23:04, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> shorter, at the colon prompt %p The % is an abbreviation for
> 1,$.
This doesn't work for me.
paul@testavoira ~ $ edbrowse tmp/bla
4
%p
?
h
unknown command %
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Samuel Thibault wrote:
shorter, at the colon prompt %p The % is an abbreviation for
1,$. To use edbrowse a little better, once a page loads try $=
and if the number of lines is larger than screen size you can read
screen by screen using z .
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018
Hello,
Paul Gevers, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 14:10:57 +0100, wrote:
> Can anybody here see text with edbrowse?
Do you know that edbrowse is a *very* special kind of webbrowser? :)
(edbrowse is the ed for web)
You can see the whole page by typing
1,$p
I now see that I didn't put that inf
Hi all,
I am trying to package a new version of edbrowse, but even the current
version *and* the Stretch version don't give me the expected results on
my system. (It seems to report the number of characters read instead of
the text itself). Can anybody here see text with edbrowse? Do other
p
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jul 2017 21:57:14 +0200
with message-id <4cab6493-08a2-e499-ae87-988330313...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: please package new edbrowse
has caused the Debian Bug report #860818,
regarding please package new edbrowse
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Thanks, done.
Quoting MENGUAL Jean-Philippe (mengualjean...@free.fr):
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the info, I had not it. Yes we will package it for Debian 10.
> Could you report a bug to edbrowse please, in order to keep archive of this?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jean-
Package: edbrowse
Version: 3.6.3
Please package the new version (3.6.3) of edbrowse.
It has some great new features like caching of http files, and M
without a destination buffer.
thanks,
Serge
Hi,
Thanks for the info, I had not it. Yes we will package it for Debian 10. Could
you report a bug to edbrowse please, in order to keep archive of this?
Regards,
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
HYPRA, progressons ensemble
Tél.: 01 84 73 06 61
Mail: cont...@hypra.fr
Site Web: http://www.hypra.fr
Hi,
there is a new version (3.6.3) of edbrowse. Were you planning on
packaging that for debian?
It has some great new features like caching of http files, and M
without a destination buffer.
thanks,
Serge
Hello,
The bug is solved! Edbrowse 3.6.1 is surfing like a charme on
www.bibnet.de now. For testing I compiled the edbrowse 3.6.1 sources from
current stretch (testing) on jessie (stable).
Thank you very much!
Christian
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:17:38 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Cont
Hi,
upstream edbrowse recently introduced a new 'bfl' (buffer list) command,
which shows the list of open edit and browse sessions. Could I tempt you
to include it in a new Debian release?
thanks,
Serge
diff -Nru edbrowse-3.6.0.1/debian/changelog edbrowse-3.6.0.1/debian/changelog
--
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #647226 [edbrowse] edbrowse: button press does not work anymore on a page
using a lot of javascript
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
647226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
e_3.4.7-1 (unstable). When pressing button
> 'i1*' ( = continue) or 'i2*' ( = abort) nothing
> happens. The same example succeeds with edbrowse_3.4.1-1+b1 (stable).
I have juste uploaded edbrowse 3.6.0 in sid, could you give it a try?
Samuel
Hi,
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 15.06.2015, 22:18 +0200:
>Sebastian Humenda, le Mon 15 Jun 2015 20:04:44 +0100, a écrit :
>> when visiting a site which requires javascript, I get: the following error:
>>
>> edbrowse http://google.de
>> no errors
>>
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:21:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#788874: fixed in edbrowse 3.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #788874,
regarding edbrowse: javascript not working
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: edbrowse
Version: 3.5.3-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
As reported by Sebastian Humenda :
“
when visiting a site which requires javascript, I get: the following error:
edbrowse http://google.de
no errors
no trailing newline
17958
Unable to exec edbrowse-js, javascript
Hello,
Sebastian Humenda, le Mon 15 Jun 2015 20:04:44 +0100, a écrit :
> when visiting a site which requires javascript, I get: the following error:
>
> edbrowse http://google.de
> no errors
> no trailing newline
> 17958
> Unable to exec edbrowse-js
Hi,
sorry, I accidentally sent this message. But when already on the list. Does
anybody experience similar issues?
Thanks
Sebastian
--
Web: http://www.crustulus.de (English|Deutsch) | Blog:
http://www.crustulus.de/blog
FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionaries - http://www.freedict.org
Freies L
Hi,
when visiting a site which requires javascript, I get: the following error:
edbrowse http://google.de
no errors
no trailing newline
17958
Unable to exec edbrowse-js, javascript has been disabled.
408
I am running Debian Unstable with edbrowse 3.5.3 from the archive
On 14-12-14 11:30, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> I've just committed Edbrowse 3.5.2 update. Could someone upload to sid?
Uploaded with some minor changes to experimental. I am using git-svn and
I could get the tagging to work. Could you please tag the current (with
my commits) as 3.5.2-
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:33:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#738477: fixed in edbrowse 3.5.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #738477,
regarding Updating the edbrowse Uploaders list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On 14-12-14 12:01, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> No, not for Jessie. It doesn't bring any major thing and I only did this
> so that I don't forget to update. No problem to target experimental,
> just we'll need to remember to switch to sid after stable is released.
It will be on my Todo list on [
On 14-12-14 11:30, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> I've just committed Edbrowse 3.5.2 update. Could someone upload to sid?
Is this something that you want to get into jessie (does it confirm to
the freeze policy)? If yes, I will look at it, if no, could you rather
target experimenta
Hi,
I've just committed Edbrowse 3.5.2 update. Could someone upload to sid?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
accelibreinfo, votre partenaire en informatique adaptée aux déficients visuels
Mail: te...@accelibreinfo.eu
Site Web: http://www.accelibreinfo.eu
--
To UNSUBS
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:14:30 +0200
with message-id <20141025111430.ga3...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#718256: edbrowse: Wrong URL in control file for
Subversion-Repository.
has caused the Debian Bug report #718256,
regarding edbrowse: Wrong
based on mozilla's libs are not reliable?
It's not about reliability, but about safety.
And mozilla itself is safe, it's libmozjs185-dev which is not considered
to be.
So ideally we should make these browsers use libmozjs-dev, but it means
keeping up with the rapid changes it is se
So, if I sum up: elinks hasn't JS enabled by default, based on mozjs.
links2 has one, but it's a internal JS support. Can we conclude that any
text browsers which have JS based on mozilla's libs are not reliable?
Regards,
Le 21/12/2013 12:43, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, l
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Sat 21 Dec 2013 11:13:06 +0100, a écrit :
> however I'm nearly sure links2 includes JS. But it's an
> internal support, not due to a mozilla js library.
And it's disabled by upstream, too.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.or
Hi,
ok for elinks, however I'm nearly sure links2 includes JS. But it's an
internal support, not due to a mozilla js library.
Regards,
Le 20/12/2013 01:36, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Tue 17 Dec 2013 23:57:16 +0100, a écrit :
Most have JS support. links2, elinks for
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Tue 17 Dec 2013 23:57:16 +0100, a écrit :
> Most have JS support. links2, elinks for instance.
But it's not enabled in the debian main archive.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721198
should probably followed-on, to get JS re-enabled in elinks, at least.
Hello Jean-Philippe,
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe schrieb am 17.12.2013, 23:57 +0100:
>Most have JS support. links2, elinks for instance. I'm in doubt for
>lynx. w3m I don't think.
W3m has definitely none.
Have you used one of the mentioned browsers on sites wich require Javascript? I
have
tried elinks
Most have JS support. links2, elinks for instance. I'm in doubt for
lynx. w3m I don't think.
Le 17/12/2013 23:50, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Shérab, le Tue 17 Dec 2013 21:36:45 +0100, a écrit :
Does it really make sense to keep edbrowse if js support is disabled?
Well, AIUI, some p
Shérab, le Tue 17 Dec 2013 21:36:45 +0100, a écrit :
> Does it really make sense to keep edbrowse if js support is disabled?
Well, AIUI, some people like it.
BTW, do we have any other textmode browser with JS support?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-r
Hi,
I think indeed we should set debian-a11y team as maintainer of edbrowse.
Technically, indeed, I'm not really satisfied to have a package where JS
is disabled. It makes it really hard to use in daily life on the
Internet. I'll ask on the mailinglist of edbrowse if they have a
so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
edbrowse was removed from stable with bug #723114 due to failing
to build with Iceaweasel 17. I propose to fix the build by using
libmozjs185-dev instead of libmozjs-dev, as the
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 17 Dec 2013 21:24:16 +0100, a écrit :
> In the meanwhile, I can easily re-upload a version to stable with JS
> disabled.
It's not so easy actually, there is no mere flag to be used. Another
way is to just use mozjs185 as in unstable, but again it's apparently
considered an
Does it really make sense to keep edbrowse if js support is disabled?
Shérab.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131217203645.GA7336@pema
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 10:45:46 +0100, a écrit :
> hmmm I had not seen this problem. Could it be fixed or it'll be for next
> stable?
Well, you are the edbrowse maintainer :)
I believe you had actually received the bug report on 16th september,
mentioning:
“
The pa
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 10:45:46 +0100, a écrit :
> > hmmm I had not seen this problem. Could it be fixed or it'll be for next
> > stable? And why such problem? I'm very surprised to see some relationship
> > between edbr
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 10:45:46 +0100, a écrit :
> hmmm I had not seen this problem. Could it be fixed or it'll be for next
> stable? And why such problem? I'm very surprised to see some relationship
> between edbrowse and Iceweasel, as they can run independe
ome relationship
> between edbrowse and Iceweasel, as they can run independently. Weird...
>
>
> Le 08/12/2013 00:21, Samuel Thibault a ?crit :
> > Zachary Kline, le Sat 07 Dec 2013 11:42:14 -0800, a ?crit :
> > > I was wondering if I could find out why the edbrowse pac
Somebody must have tried using edbrowse with iceweasel as a browser
default in a machine and finding an imcompatibility between a
console-based package and their favorite browser had edbrowse removed.
People that cannot understand that one cannot do such things due to
interface
hmmm I had not seen this problem. Could it be fixed or it'll be for next
stable? And why such problem? I'm very surprised to see some
relationship between edbrowse and Iceweasel, as they can run
independently. Weird...
Le 08/12/2013 00:21, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Zachary Kline,
Zachary Kline, le Sat 07 Dec 2013 11:42:14 -0800, a écrit :
> I was wondering if I could find out why the edbrowse package isn’t in stable?
It's recorded on http://packages.qa.debian.org/edbrowse
When clicking on "Removed 3.4.8-2 from stable", one gets to the RM mail,
men
Hi All,
I was wondering if I could find out why the edbrowse package isn’t in stable?
Forgive me if this is an obvious question, I’m just wondering if there's record
somewhere of why it was removed. It’s in testing and unstable and oldstable,
so… :)
Thanks for any input,
Zack.
Hello,
p...@pjb.com.au wrote on Fr, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:28:04 +1000:
>Mario Lang wrote:
>> While it (edbrowse) is a very interesting tool, I still find
>> lynx more convenient :-). However, its really useful for
>> scripting and generally, for command-line freaks.
>
>I
covering it as well
>
> The Javascript support can also be very useful.
I've occasionally run edbrowse for that reason alone, in circumstances in
which starting an X session and invoking Iceweasel either wasn't possible at
the time or would have been more work.
For sites that use Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have been neglecting edbrowse for far too long.
I am sorry for this. While it is a very interesting tool,
I still find lynx more convenient :-). However, its really useful for
scripting and generally, for command-line freaks.
However, it needs a maintainer who
art is missing here (which probably explains flags not being
taken into account).
> dh_auto_build -- CFLAGS="-I/usr/lib/icedove -DXP_UNIX" LIBS="-lpcre
> -lssl -lmozjs -lcurl" JSLIBS="-lmozjs" LFLAGS="" edbrowse
> sed -e's;^\.\.\(.\
d the log, and
> > the rules file. this file is similar as the original one in edbrowse
> > 3.4.1. I attach also rulejp, which is my rules file, I changed. But I
> > got a similar error with the ipsas.h (in /usr/include/mozjs).
>
> I can't check it now with my crappy conne
Hello,
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL, le Sat 23 Jul 2011 06:54:59 +0200, a écrit :
> But I've a problem doing dpkg-buildpackage. Here's attached the log, and
> the rules file. this file is similar as the original one in edbrowse
> 3.4.1. I attach also rulejp, which is my rules fil
I was told js-1.7 stable version works if downloaded from mozilla and
built on local systems. On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Thanks. I found another source of my problems: I didn't use the proper
> package for readline.h. Now I have other problems with jsapi.h
> dependencies,
I downloaded the edbrowse package from its git repository and had
trouble building it and I'm using wheezy/sid.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying updating edbrowse. I plan to submit the update to the
> maintainer or to become maintai
ges break lots of packages that rely
on Mozilla's Javascript interpreter.
Mozilla, apparently, aren't interested in the embedding of their code in other
projects. I would suggest that edbrowse ought to be looking for an alternative
Javascript interpreter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Thanks. I found another source of my problems: I didn't use the proper
package for readline.h. Now I have other problems with jsapi.h
dependencies, but I refer upstream because Debian tools are not implied.
Regards,
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Le samedi 23 juillet 2011 à 15:46 +1000, Jason White a éc
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> override_auto_build:
> dh_auto_build -- -I/usr/include/mozjs -DXP_UNIX
>From memory, you can specify -I more than once to add directories to be
searched for header files.
I would add -I/usr/include/whatever
to the above line.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hi,
I'm trying updating edbrowse. I plan to submit the update to the
maintainer or to become maintainer of this package if it is not
maintained anymore. Samuel suggested me doing that, remembering a
message on this list who asked for an update.
But I've a problem doing dpkg-buildpacka
Frost wrote:
> The title says it all. edbrowse hasn't seen an upgrade or bug
> fix since Debian Slink.
I've used it occasionally and found it helpful, especially for certain
Javascript-dependent pages with forms that are validated by the Javascript.
Version 3.4.7 is
Try:
http://the-brannons.com/edbrowse/edbrowse-3.4.7.zip
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.00.1105211406570.88.
Yes, development continues. Keep in touch with edbrowse development by
subscribing to the commandline email group on yahoogroups.com. The
version I have on my box I think is something like 3.45. Carl Dalkhe
converted it from perl a while ago then added javascript support but had
to pass the
Try this url and look at the version number that shows up:
http://the-brannons.com/edbrowse/edbrowse.pl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
I was wrong, I have version 3.4.4 on my machine and 3.4.4 isn't even
current now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.00.1105211354
The title says it all. edbrowse hasn't seen an upgrade or bug
> fix since Debian Slink.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Linux User: 177869 # Powered By: Intel # http://rivensight.dyndns.org
> Postings Copyrighted 2010-2011 by: Michae
The title says it all. edbrowse hasn't seen an upgrade or bug
fix since Debian Slink.
Michael
--
Linux User: 177869 # Powered By: Intel # http://rivensight.dyndns.org
Postings Copyrighted 2010-2011 by: Michael Ferranti
--
To UNSUBS
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:57:36PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I guess the javascript part of edbrowse is not enable in the debian
> package, possibly for no reason but the packager not knowing that it
> exists. You should probably file a bug report.
It turns out that Javascript i
Chuck Hallenbeck, le Sat 22 Nov 2008 06:12:04 -0500, a écrit :
> Increasing the edbrowse debug level to 3 shows that the package version
> does not execute some javascript code which the sourceforge version
> executes, stopping with an empty buffer instead.
I guess the javascript part of
Forgot to mention: My router is a Linksys WRT54G2
Chuck
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 06:12:04AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> If this is a known issue, I apologize. I am running a Lenny/testing
> system here, using only text console tools, no GUI. I have been using
> edbrowse for seve
If this is a known issue, I apologize. I am running a Lenny/testing
system here, using only text console tools, no GUI. I have been using
edbrowse for several years, keeping it current from the sourceforge CVS
archive.
I recently noticed the Debian package for edbrowse, which seemed to be
the
77 matches
Mail list logo
